Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:39:06.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

‘We who are not here’: law, whiteness, indigenous peoples and the promise of genetic identification*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2007

Karen O’Connell
Karen O’Connell*
Affiliation:
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Sydney, Australia**
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In contemporary law, genetic technologies of the body have provided a new layer of complexity to legal determinations of racial identity. Indigenous peoples in particular are often forced to present themselves before law as invisible peoples requesting embodiment, possessing no set identity and requiring a legal determination of their status. In return for their participation in genetic research indigenous peoples have been promised, amongst other things, a reliable identification that would make them visible as indigenous before the law. This article examines genetic and non-genetic approaches to identifying indigenous peoples through a case study of Australian law and argues that while genetic technologies may have little to offer indigenous populations they do hold out the possibility of making visible to whites and white institutions their own obscured racial identity.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 35 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Attorney-General (Cth) v. State of Queensland (1990) 94 ALR 515.Google Scholar
Australian Broadcasting Commission (2002) ‘Tasmanian DNA Test Controversy Grows’ PM 4 September: http://www.abc.net.au/pm/stories/s667275.htm.Google Scholar
Australian Law Reform Commission (2003) Essentially Yours: The Protection of Human Genetic Information in Australia. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Australian Law Reform Commission (1986) The Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Laws. Sydney: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
Briginshaw v. Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 366.Google Scholar
Chatwin, Bruce (1987) The Songlines. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Commonwealth v. Tasmania (1983) 158 CLR 1.Google Scholar
Cooper v. Stuart (1889) 14 App Cas 286.Google Scholar
Cornell, Drucilla (1992) Philosophy of the Limit. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De plevitz, Loretta and Croft, Larry (2003) ‘Aboriginality Under the Microscope: The Biological Descent Test in Australian Law’, QUT Law and Justice Journal 3(1): 105.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques (1994) Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International, Kamuf, Peggy (trans.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dodson, M. and Williamson, R. (1999) ‘Indigenous Peoples and the Morality of the Human Genome Diversity Project’, Journal of Medical Ethics 25: 204.Google Scholar
The Economist (2005) ‘Natural Genius?’ 2 June: http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4032638.Google Scholar
Ellison, Ralph (1965) Invisible Man. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley (1991/1999) ‘The Law Wishes to Have a Formal Existence’, in Aram Veeser, H. (ed.), The Stanley Fish Reader. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell, p. 165.Google Scholar
Frankenberg, Ruth (1993) White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Race. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1899/1976) Interpretation of Dreams, Strachey, James (trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1901/1975) The Psychopathology of Everyday Life, Tyson, Alan (trans.). Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund (1919/1955) ‘The “Uncanny”’ in Strachey, James (ed.), Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. London: Hogarth Press, vol 17, p. 218.Google Scholar
Friend, Robin (1992) We Who Are Not Here: Aboriginal People of the Huon and Channel Today. Huonville: Huon Municipal Association.Google Scholar
Gaita, Raimond (2000) ‘Who Speaks, About What, To Whom, On Whose Behalf, With What Right?’, in Craven, Peter (ed.), Best Australian Essays. Melbourne: Black Inc, p. 163.Google Scholar
Gardiner-Garden, John (2000) ‘The Definition of Aboriginality’, Research Note 18. Canberra: Parliament of Australia.Google Scholar
Greely, Henry T. (1996) ‘Genes, Patents, and Indigenous Peoples: Biomedical Research and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights’, Cultural Survival Quarterly 20(2): 54.Google Scholar
Grosz, Elizabeth (1989) Sexual Subversions: Three French Feminists. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Grounds, Richard A. (1996) ‘The Yuchi Community and the Human Genome Diversity Project: Historic and Contemporary Ironies’, Cultural Survival Quarterly 20(2): 64.Google Scholar
Guilliatt, Richard (2002) ‘A Whiter Shade of Black?’ Good Weekend, 15 June, p. 18.Google Scholar
Haraway, Donna (1997) Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_OncoMouse™. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harmon, Amy (2006) ‘Seeking Ancestry in DNA Ties Uncovered by Tests’, New York Times, 12 April: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/12/us/12genes.html?ex=1159156800&en=ea420dccdb685154&ei=5070.Google Scholar
Hayden, Corinne P. (1998) ‘A Biodiversity Sampler for the Millenium’, in Franklin, Sarah and Ragone, Helene (eds.), Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power and Technological Innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, p. 173.Google Scholar
In the Matter of The Aboriginal Lands Act 1995 and In the Matter of Marianne Watson (No 2) [2001] TASSC 105.Google Scholar
Karpin, Isabel and O’connell, Karen (2005) ‘Speaking into a Silence: Embedded Constitutionalism and Women’s Rights in Australia’ in Baines, Beverley and Rubio-Marin, Ruth (eds.), The Gender of Constitutional Jurisprudence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 173.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia (1991) Strangers to Ourselves, Roudiez, L. S. (trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lacapra, Dominick (1990) ‘Violence, Justice and the Force of Law’, Cardozo Law Review 11: 701.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Susan C. (1994) ‘Commentary: Diversity’, in Weir, R. F., Lawrence, S.C. and Fales, E., Genes and Human Self-Knowledge: Historical and Philosophical Reflections on Modern Genetics. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
Mabo v. Queensland (No. 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1.Google Scholar
Mandla (Sewa Singh) v. Dowell Lee [1983] 1 QB 1.Google Scholar
Mead, Aroha Te Pareake (1996) ‘Genealogy, Sacredness and the Commodities Market’, Cultural Survival Quarterly 20(2): 46.Google Scholar
Moore, John (1996) ‘Native Americans, Scientists and the HGDP’, Cultural Survival Quarterly 20(2): 60.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy and Lindee, Susan M. (1995) The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
O’connell, Karen (2007) ‘Cutting the Father: DNA Testing, Paternity Fraud and Law in the Genetic Age’, unpublished paper (on file with author).Google Scholar
Ofu-Koloi v. The Queen (1956) 96 CLR 172.Google Scholar
Patmore and others and Independent Indigenous Advisory Committee [2002] AATA 962.Google Scholar
Perkins, Maureen (2004) ‘False Whiteness: Passing and the Stolen Generations’, in Moreton-Robinson, Aileen (ed.), Whitening Race: Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press, p. 164.Google Scholar
‘Preface’ (1984) Law Text Culture 4(1): i.Google Scholar
Ravenscroft, Alison (2004) ‘Anxieties of Dispossession: Whiteness, History and Australia's War in Vietnam’, in Moreton-Robinson, Aileen (ed.), Whitening Race: Essays in Social and Cultural Criticism. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press, p. 3.Google Scholar
Reardon, Jenny (2001) ‘The Human Genome Diversity Project: A Case Study in Coproduction’, Social Studies of Science 31(3): 357.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Henry (2003) The Law Of The Land. Camberwell, Victoria: Penguin.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Henry (1999) Why Weren't We Told? Ringwood, Victoria: Viking.Google Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy (1997) ‘The Nature of Blacks’ Skepticism about Genetic Testing’ Seton Hall Law Rev 27: 971.Google Scholar
Ronell, Avital (1993) Dictations: On Haunted Writing. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody (1991) National Report. Canberra: AGPS.Google Scholar
Royle, Nicholas (2003) The Uncanny. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Lyndall (1996) The Aboriginal Tasmanians. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Shaw v. Wolf (1999) 163 ALR 205.Google Scholar
State of Queensland v. Wyvill (1989) 90 ALR 611.Google Scholar
Sydney Morning Herald (2002) ‘Blood Lines Called into Question’ 26 August: http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/08/25/1030053009287.html.Google Scholar
Tauli-corpuz, Victoria (2001) ‘Biotechnology and Indigenous Peoples’, in Tokar, Brian (ed.), Redesigning Life: The Worldwide Challenge to Genetic Engineering. London, New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Waldby, Catherine (2000) The Visible Human Project: Informatic Bodies and Posthuman Medicine. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, Irene (1998) ‘Naked Peoples: Rules and Regulations’, Law Text Culture 4(1): 1.Google Scholar
Williams, Patricia J. (1997) Seeing a Color-Blind Future: The Paradox of Race. London: Virago.Google Scholar