Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:29:36.280Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regulation as the art of intuitive judgment: a critique of the economic approach to environmental regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Oren Perez
Oren Perez*
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, Bar Ilan University, Faculty of Law, Ramat Gan, Israel
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article develops a general critique of the economic approach to environmental regulation, drawing on the insights of systems theory. It highlights, first, the problematic of subjugating the regulatory system to a single purpose – which in the context of environmental economics is interpreted as the utilitarian maximization of collective welfare. Second, it questions the teleological pretence of the regulatory project as it is configured in the economic literature. It highlights in this context the problem of trans-systemic incompatibilities, which impede the incorporation of economic ideas into the systems of law and politics. Environmental economics in both its normative and sociopolitical strands, fails to provide a convincing response to this dilemma. The article discusses two examples of the reconstruction of economic ideas within the legal and political domains, drawing on the EU and US regulatory experience. This twofold critique of the economic approach can be extended, it is argued, to every regulatory project with far-reaching teleological ambitions. The article applies this critique to some alternative regulatory visions, such as self-regulation, reflexive law and responsive regulation, noting in this context the limitations of systems theory itself. It concludes with a discussion of the role of intuition in regulatory decision-making.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 4 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 291 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asimov, Isaac (1951) Foundation. New York: Gnome Press.Google Scholar
Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. (1992) Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Robert and Black, Julia (2008) ‘Really Responsive Regulation’, Modern Law Review 71: 59–94.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland (1980/1993) Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography, trans Howard, R.. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Bator, Francis M. (1958) ‘The Anatomy of Market Failure’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 72(3): 351–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Gary S. (1968) ‘Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach’, Journal of Political Economy 76: 169–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, Julia (1996) ‘Constitutionalising Self-Regulation’, Modern Law Review 59(1): 24–55.Google Scholar
Brans, Marleen and Rossbach, Stefan (1997) ‘The Autopoiesis of Administrative Systems: Niklas Luhmann on Public Administration and Public Policy’, Public Administration 75: 417–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capros, P. and Mantzos, L. (2000) The Economic Effects of EU-wide Industry-Level Emission Trading to Reduce Greenhouse Gases – Results from PRIMES model. Athens: Institute of Communication and Computer Systems, National Technical University of Athens.Google Scholar
Christodoulidis, Emilios (1991) ‘A Case for Reflexive Politics: Challenging Luhmann’s Account of the Political System’, Economy and Society 20(4): 380–401.Google Scholar
Coglianese, Cary (2008) ‘Reflections on Executive Order 13,422: The Rhetoric and Reality of Regulatory Reform’, Yale Journal on Regulation 25: 10–12.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. A. (1999) ‘Monitoring and Enforcement of Environmental Policy’ in Tietenberg, T. and Folmer, H. (eds) International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, Volume III. Northampton: Edward Elgar, 44–106.Google Scholar
Collins, Hugh (2002) ‘Law as Politics: Progressive American Perspectives’ in Penner, J., Schiff, D. and Nobles, R. (eds) Jurisprudence and Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 279–333.Google Scholar
Dahlstrom, KristinaHowes, ChrisLeinster, Paul and Skea, Jim (2003) ‘Environmental Management Systems and Company Performance: Assessing the Case for Extending Risk-Based Regulation’, European Environment 13: 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dana, David A. (2001) ‘Rethinking the Puzzle of Escalating Penalties for Repeat Offenders’, Yale Law Journal 110(5): 733–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnall, Nicole and Sides, Stephen (2008) ‘Assessing the Performance of Voluntary Environmental Programs: Does Certification Matter?’, Policy Studies Journal 36(1): 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, Stephen Benedict (2006) ‘Personality and Foreign Policy: Tony Blair’s Iraq Decisions’, Foreign Policy Analysis 2: 289–306.Google Scholar
Ecofys (2004) Analysis of the National Allocation Plans for the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. London: Ecofys UK.Google Scholar
Eea (2005) ‘Market-based Instruments for Environmental Policy in Europe’, EEA Technical report No 8/2005. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.Google Scholar
Entreprises Pour L’environnement, (2006) EU-ETS Review. Available at: http://www.epe-asso.org/pdf_rapa/EpE_rapports_et_documents7.pdfGoogle Scholar
Epa (2000) Guidelines for Preparing Economic Analyses. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Epa (2001) The United States Experience with Economic Incentives for Protecting the Environment. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Epa (2005) Position Statement on Environmental Management Systems (EMS). Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Epa science advisory board (2005) Identifying and Calculating Economic Benefit that Goes Beyond Avoided and/or Delayed Costs: An SAB Advisory. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
Estache, Antonio and Martimort, David (1999) ‘Politics, Transaction Costs, and the Design of Regulatory Institutions. World Bank Working Paper 2073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eu commission (2000) Green Paper on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading within the European Union. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
Frey, Bruno S. and Stutzer, Alois (2006) ‘Environmental Morale and Motivation’, IERE Working Paper No. 288.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, Sumantra (2005) ‘Bad Management Theories are Destroying Good Management Practices’, Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1): 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulder, Lawrence H. and Parry, Ian W. H. (2008) ‘Instrument Choice in Environmental Policy’, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 2(2): 152–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowdy, John and Erickson, Jon D. (2005) ‘The Approach of Ecological Economics’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 29(2): 207–222.Google Scholar
Grand, Julian le (1991) ‘The Theory of Government Failure’, British Journal of Political Science 21: 423–42.Google Scholar
Grubb, Michael and Neuhoff, Karsten (2006) ‘Allocation and Competitiveness in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Policy Overview’, Climate Policy 6: 7–30.Google Scholar
Gunningham, Neil and Rees, Joseph (1997) ‘Industry Self-Regulation: An Institutional Perspective’, Law & Policy 19(4): 363–414.Google Scholar
Hahn, Robert W. (2000) ‘The Impact of Economics on Environmental Policy’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 39(3): 375–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hepburn, Cameron (2006) ‘Regulation by Prices, Quantities, or Both: A Review of Instrument Choice’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 22: 226–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heylighen, F. (2002) ‘Complexity and Information Overload in Society: Why Increasing Efficiency Leads to Decreasing Control’, Unpublished manuscript, http://pcp.vub.ac.be/Papers/Info-Overload.pdf.Google Scholar
Heylighen, F. (2007) ‘Knowledge Selection Criteria’, Principia Cybernetica Web, http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/KNOWSELC.html [last visited 19 October 2008].Google Scholar
House of commons environmental audit select committee (2007) ‘The EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Lessons for the Future’, HC 70.Google Scholar
Keohane, N. O.Revesz, R. L. and Stavins, R. N. (1998) ‘The Choice of Regulatory Instruments in Environmental Policy’, Harvard Environmental Law Review 22(2): 313–68.Google Scholar
King, Andrew A. and Lenox, Michael J. (2000) ‘Industry Self-Regulation Without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry’s Responsible Care Program’, Academy of Management Journal 43(4): 698–717.Google Scholar
King, Michael (2006) ‘What’s the Use of Luhmann’s Theory?’ in King, M. and Thornhill, C. (eds) Luhmann on Law and Politics: Critical Appraisals and Applications. Oxford: Hart, 37–52.Google Scholar
Kirchgässner, Gebhard and Schneider, Friedrich (2003) ‘On the Political Economy of Environmental Policy’, Public Choice 115(3): 369–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laffont, Jean-Jacques and Martimort, David (1999) ‘Separation of Regulators Against Collusive Behavior’, Rand Journal of Economics 30(2): 232–62.Google Scholar
Leamer, E. E. (2007) ‘A Flat World, a Level Playing Field, a Small World After All, or None of the Above? A Review of Thomas L. Friedman’s The World is Flat’, Journal of Economic Literature 45: 83–126.Google Scholar
Letelier, Juan Carlos, Marin, Gonzalo and Mpodozis, Jorge (2003) ‘Autopoietic and (M,R) Systems’, Journal of Theoretical Biology 222(2): 261–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovelock, James E. (1991) Gaia: the Practical Science of Planetary Medicine. London: Gaia Books.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1989) Ecological Communication, trans Bednarz, J.Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1992) ‘Operational Closure and Structural Coupling: The Differentiation of the Legal System’, Cardozo Law Review 13: 1419–41.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1995) Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (1998) Observations on Modernity, trans Whobrey, W.. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas (2004) Law As a Social System, trans Ziegert, K. A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lutter, Randall (2001) Improving Regulatory Analysis at the Environmental Protection Agency, Testimony Before the House Committee on Small Business, Subcommittee on Regulatory Reform and Oversight (Testimony 01-5). Washington, DC: AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies.Google Scholar
Markussen, Peter and Svendsen, Gert Tinggaard (2005) ‘Industry Lobbying and the Political Economy of GHG Trade in the European Union’, Energy Policy 33(2): 245–55.Google Scholar
Martimort, David (1999) ‘The Life Cycle of Regulatory Agencies: Dynamic Capture and Transaction Costs’, The Review of Economic Studies 66(4): 929–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maturana, H. R. (1988) ‘Reality: The Search for Objectivity or the Quest for a Compelling Argument’, The Irish Journal of Psychology 9(1):25–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maturana, H. R. and Mpodozis, Jorge (2000) ‘The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Drift’, Revista chilena de historia natural 73(2): 261–310.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. and Halperin, Karen D. (2008) ‘A Framework for the Study of Personality and Political Behaviour’, British Journal of Political Science 38: 335–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreau, Francois (2004) ‘The Role of the State in Evolutionary Economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics 28(6): 847–74.Google Scholar
Oates, Wallace E., Portney, Paul R. (2003) ‘The Political Economy of Environmental Policy’ in Mäler, Karl-Göran and Vincent, Jeffrey R. (eds) Handbook of Environmental Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 325–54.Google Scholar
Ogus, Anthony (2006) A. Ogus, Costs and Cautionary Tales: Economic Insights for the Law. Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Paterson, J. and Teubner, G. (1998) ‘Changing Maps: Empirical Legal Autopoiesis’, Social & Legal Studies 7(4): 451–86.Google Scholar
Pearce, David (2006) ‘The Political Economy of an Energy Tax: The United Kingdom’s Climate Change Levy. Energy Economics 28(2): 149–58.Google Scholar
Peltzman, SamLevine, Michael E. and Noll, Roger G. (1989) ‘The Economic Theory of Regulation after a Decade of Deregulation’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics, 1–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, Oren (2003) ‘Normative Creativity and Global Legal Pluralism: Reflections on the Democratic Critique of Transnational Law’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 10(2): 25–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, Oren (2006) ‘Law in the Air: A Prologue to the World of Legal Paradoxes’, in Perez, O. and Teubner, G. (eds) Paradoxes and Inconsistencies in Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 3–38.Google Scholar
Petitmengin-peugeot, Claire (1999) ‘The Intuitive Experience’, in Varela, F. J. and Shear, J. (eds) The View from Within: First-person Approaches to the Study of Consciousness. Exeter: Imprint Academic, 43–77.Google Scholar
Pinch, Trevor J. and Bijker, Wiebe E. (1984) ‘The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other’, Social Studies of Science 14(3): 399–441.Google Scholar
Polinsky, Mitchell A. and Shavell, Steven (1994) ‘Should Liability be Based on the Harm to the Victim or the Gain to the Injurer?’, Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 10: 427–37.Google Scholar
Prakash, Aseem and Potoski, Matthew (2006) The Voluntary Environmentalists: Green Clubs, ISO 14001, and Voluntary Environmental Regulations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, M. (2000) ‘Issues in Assessing Psychological Characteristics at a Distance: An Introduction to the Symposium’, Political Psychology 21: 511–27.Google Scholar
Siegel, Neil S. (1999) ‘Sen and the Hart of Jurisprudence: A Critique of the Economic Analysis of Judicial behavior’, California Law Review 87(6): 1581–608.Google Scholar
Sijm, J., Neuhoff, K. and Chen, Y. (2006) ‘CO2 Cost Pass-through and Windfall Profits in the Power Sector’, Climate Policy 6: 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simons, Kenneth W. (2001) ‘The Hand Formula in the Draft Restatement Third of Torts: Encompassing Fairness As Well As Efficiency Values’, Vanderbilt Law Review 54: 901–40.Google Scholar
Stavins, Robert N. (2001) Experience with Market-Based Environmental Policy Instruments. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Research Working Papers Series, October 2001, RWP00-004.Google Scholar
Steinberger, Peter J. (1993) The Concept of Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1971) ‘The Theory of Economic Regulation’, The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2(1): 3–21.Google Scholar
Sunder, Madhavi (2001) ‘Cultural Dissent’, Stanford Law Review 54: 495–567.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (1983) ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’, Law & Society Review 17: 239–85.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (1990) ‘How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law as an Autopoietic System. Law and Society Review 23: 727–57.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (1993) Law as an Autopoietic System. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (2001) ‘Economics of Gift – Positivity of Justice: The Mutual Paranoia of Jacques Derrida and Niklas Luhmann’, Theory, Culture & Society 18(1): 29–47.Google Scholar
Tietenberg, Tom (2003) Environmental and Natural Resource Economics, 6th edn. Boston: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy (2003) ‘Locating Distribution’, The Journal of Legal Studies 32: 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warford, Jeremy J.Munasinghe, Mohan and Cruz, Wilfrido (1997) The Greening of Economic Policy Reform. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Winter, David G. (2005) ‘Things I’ve Learned about Personality from Studying Political Leaders at a Distance’, Journal of Personality 73(3): 557–84.Google Scholar