Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:47:01.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regulating agriculture in the WTO

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 April 2011

Fiona Smith
Fiona Smith*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Laws, University College London
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article argues there is value in exploring the resonance between the regulation of international agricultural trade as a specific topic and the general notion of international trade regulation in the World Trade Organisation (WTO). It explores particular problems to illuminate more general concerns. In this ascendant way of looking at things, certain aspects of agricultural trade regulation have direct resonance for other areas covered by the WTO agreements. We might see these additional dimensions as addressing a different series of questions: the nature of agreement and the different ways in which agreement can manifest itself. The two dimensions are the nature of international agricultural trade as a polycentric problem and the way accepted concepts and categories influence how we see problems in international agricultural trade. Polycentrism goes to the nature of the stability of the Agreement on Agriculture, whereas the question of concepts and categories concerns the way in which we represent the problem as coherent to ourselves.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 233 - 247
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, K. and Josling, T. (eds) (2005) The WTO and Agriculture. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Anderson, K. and Martin, W. (2005) ‘Agricultural Trade Reform and the Doha Development Agenda’, World Economy 28: 1301–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. E. (2009), ‘Trade Negotiations Within the GATT/WTO Framework: A Survey of Success and Failures’, Journal of Policy Modeling 31(4): 515–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, (2009) ‘Doha Talks Get New Energy at Cairns’ Group Meeting’, 13(21), 10 June.Google Scholar
Broude, T. (2004), International Governance in the WTO. London: Cameron May.Google Scholar
Capling, A. and Higgott, R. (eds) (2009) ‘Special Issue: The Future Role of the Multilateral Trade System: What Role for the World Trade Organisation?’, Global Governance 15(3): 313–09.Google Scholar
Charnowitz, S. (2007) ‘The WTO's Environmental Progress’, Journal of International Economic Law 10: 685–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, W. D. and Tangermann, S. (1999) ‘The 1992 CAP Reform, the Uruguay Round and the Commission: Conceptualizing Linked Policy Games’, Journal of Common Market Studies 37: 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desta, M. G. (2002) The Law of International Trade in Agricultural Products: From GATT 1947 to the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Desta, M. G. (2003) ‘The Bumpy Ride Towards the Establishment of a “Fair and Market-Oriented Agricultural Trading System” at the WTO: Reflections Following the Cancun Setback’, Drake Journal of Agricultural Law 8: 489–537.Google Scholar
Esty, D. C. (2004) Greening the GATT: Trade, Environment and the Future. Washington, DC: Pierson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Finger, J. M. and Winters, L. A. (2002) ‘Reciprocity’, in English, P., Hoekman, B. and Mattoo, A. (eds) Development, Trade and the WTO: A Handbook. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. S. (1978) ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’, Harvard Law Review 92: 353–409.Google Scholar
Grossman, M. (2003) ‘Multifunctionality and Non-Trade Concerns’, in Cardwell, M. N., Grossman, M. R. and Rodgers, C. P. (eds), Agriculture and International Trade: Law, Policy and the WTO. Oxford: CABI, 85–129.Google Scholar
Hertel, T. (1997) Global Trade Analysis: Modelling and Implications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hertel, T., Keeney, R., Ivanic, M. and Winters, L. Alan (2006) Distributional Effects of WTO Agriculture Reforms in Rich and Poor Countries. New York: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R. (2002) ‘From Politics to Technocracy – and Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading System’, American Journal of International Law 96: 94–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudec, R. E. (1975) The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hudec, R. E. (1993) Enforcing International Trade Law. Salem, MA: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Ingco, M. D. and Nash, J. D. (eds) (2004) Agriculture and the WTO: Creating a Trading System for Development. Washington DC: World Bank; and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (1969) World Trade and the Law of GATT, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (1999) ‘World Trade Rules and Environmental Policies: Congruence or Conflict?’, Washington & Lee Law Review 49: 1227–78.Google Scholar
Lindland, J. (1997) The Impact of the Uruguay Round on Tariff Escalation. ESCAP/No.3. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organisation.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. (2004) Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Martin, W. and Anderson, K. (2008) ‘Agricultural Trade Reform under the Doha Agenda: Some Key Issues’, Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 52: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcmahon, J. A. (2006) The WTO Agreement on Agriculture: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrison, J. and Sarris, A. (2007) WTO Rules for Agriculture Compatible for Development. New York: World Bank.Google Scholar
O'connor, B. (ed.) (2005) Agriculture in WTO Law. London: Cameron May.Google Scholar
OECD (2006) Agricultural Policy and Trade Reform: Potential Effects at Global, National and Household Levels. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
OXFAM (2009) ‘4 a Week: Changing Food Consumption in the UK to Benefit People and the Planet’, OXFAM Briefing Paper. London: Oxfam UK.Google Scholar
Shaffer, G. (2005) ‘Power, Governance and the WTO: A Comparative Institutional Approach’, University of Minnesota, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 09–11.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. (1982) ‘The Changing Face of Private Law: Doctrinal Categories and the Regulatory State’, Legal Studies 2: 257–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, R. H. (ed.) (2002) The Greening of Trade Law. Maryland, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Stewart, T. P. (1999) The GATT Uruguay Round: A Negotiating History. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Tarullo, D. (1985) ‘Logic, Myth and the International Economic Order’, Harvard International Law Journal 26: 533–52.Google Scholar
Warley, T. (1976) ‘Western Trade in Agricultural Products’, in Shonfield, A. (ed.), International Economic Relations of the Western World 1959–1971, Volume I–Politics and Trade. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953) Philosophical Investigations. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
WTO (1999) Trade and Environment at the WTO. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
WTO (2007) ‘Lamy Says Relatively Small Concessions Needed for Reaching Doha Agreement’, The Doha Round at a Crossroad, Economic and Social Council 2007 High-Level Segment, High-Level Policy Dialogue on Current Developments in the World Economy and International Economic Cooperation. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
WTO (2008a) ‘Elements Required for the Completion of the Services Negotiations: Report of the Chairman’, TN/S/33, 26 May 2008. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
WTO (2008b) ‘Day 9: Talks Collapse Despite Progress on a List of Issues’, WTO, 29 July 2008. www.wto.org/english/news_e/news08_e/meet08_summary_29july_e.htm. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
WTO/ENEP (2009) Trade and Climate Change. Geneva: WTO.Google Scholar
Zampetti, A. (2003) ‘Democratic Legitimacy in the World Trade Organization: The Justice Dimension’, Journal of World Trade 37: 105–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar