No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Question for the Description of the Law. By Reidar Edvinsson, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2009. x + 113 pp. ISBN 978-3-540-70501-7, £99 hardback.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 July 2013
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013
References
Cosgrove, Richard A. (1981) ‘The Reception of Analytic Jurisprudence: The Victorian Debate on the Separation of Law and Morality, 1860–1900’, Durham University Journal 74: 47–56.Google Scholar
Dickson, Julie (2004) ‘Methodology in Jurisprudence: A Critical Survey’, Legal Theory 10: 117–56.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1985) A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Halpin, Andrew (2006) ‘The Methodology of Jurisprudence: Thirty Years Off the Point’, Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 19: 67–105.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell (2007) David Hume: Moral and Political Theorist. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lobban, Michael (1991) The Common Law and English Jurisprudence 1760–1850. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Priel, Dan (2012) ‘The Scientific Model of Jurisprudence’, Washington University Jurisprudence Review 4: 269–323.Google Scholar
Priel, Dan (2013) ‘The Scientific Model of Jurisprudence’, in Beltán, Jordi Ferrer et al. (eds), Neutrality and Theory of Law. Heidelberg: Springer Dordrecht. 239–54.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph (1979) The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schofield, Philip (1991) ‘Jeremy Bentham and Nineteenth-Century English Jurisprudence’, Journal of Legal History 12: 58–88.Google Scholar
Stein, Peter (1988) The Character and Influence of the Roman Civil Law: Historical Essays. London: Hambledon Press.Google Scholar