Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:27:13.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The moral quality of work in international economic institutions: resisting complacency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

Maksymilian Del Mar
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Edinburgh and Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Lausanne; Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Queensland and the High Court of Australia
Oche Onazi
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Edinburgh; Barrister and Solicitor of the Supreme Court of Nigeria

Abstract

This paper offers a theory through which, we argue, we can more appropriately evaluate and potentially improve the moral quality of work. There are three components to such a theory. The first two components, which we argue need to be integrated, are normative resources that appeal to two different behavioural capacities: first, the articulation of rules, appealing to the capacity of agents to deliberate about what they ought to do; second, the introduction of forms of institutional design, appealing to the capacity of agents to acquire habits and dispositions in certain social environments. The third and most important component is that of the infinity of suffering and vulnerability. This component has both a negative and a positive aspect. On the negative side, the component is designed to assist us in recognising the inevitable limitations of either normative resource or indeed any one integrated totality of normative resources (i.e., both rules and forms of institutional design). Those limitations consist in the narrowing of the domain of objects of value towards which workers are guided or oriented by either or both normative resources. On the positive side, the component encourages us to construct alternative normative resources on the basis of alternative forms of representation of suffering and vulnerability. In that respect, the specific policy proposal of this paper is that of the establishment of Community Forums, which are designed to offer a framework thanks to which some of the particularities of suffering and vulnerability within a specific community can be recognised and communicated in a multiplicity of ways, thereafter forming a resource for the development of policy with respect to the challenges facing that specific community. The second part of the paper applies this theory to consider the value and limitations of second-generation reforms in international economic institutions. The third part of the paper further considers the values and limitations of reforms for access to public goods and services in Nigeria.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adaralegbe, A. (2003) ‘Are the Electricity Laws in Nigeria Sufficient to Promote and Preserve Competition?’, International Energy Law and Tax Review 9: 251–57.Google Scholar
Allan, J. (2005) ‘ “Do the Right Thing” Judging? The High Court of Australia in Al-Kateb’, University of Queensland Law Journal 24(1): 134.Google Scholar
Alubo, O. (2001) The Promise and Limits of Private Medicine: Health Policy Dilemmas in Nigeria. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ariyo, A and Jerome, A. (2004) ‘Utility Privatisation and the Poor: Nigeria in Focus’, Heinrich Boll Foundation. http://www.boell.de/downloads/global/GIP%2012%20Nigeria_Engl.pdf [last accessed 12 January 2008].Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1969) ‘The Organization of Economic Activity: Issues Pertinent to the Choice of Market Versus Non–Market Allocation’, in The Analysis and Evolution of Public Expenditure: The PPB System, Vol. 1, US Joint Economic Committee, 91st Congress, 1st Session, Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office, 59–73.Google Scholar
Bańkowski, Z. (2001) Living Lawfully: Love in Law and Law in Love, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayliss, K. (2001) ‘Privatisation of Electricity Distribution: Some Economic, Social and Political Perspectives’, Public Services International Research Unit Report, University of Greenwich. http://www.psiru.org/reports/2001-04-E-Distrib.doc [last accessed 5 August 2007].Google Scholar
Benjamin, W. (1996). ‘Critique of Violence’, in Selected Writings, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 236–53.Google Scholar
Berthelot, J-M. (2001) Épistémologie des Sciences Socials. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. (2005) ‘Responsive Regulation and Developing Economics’, Global Economic Governance Programme Working Paper 15. www.globaleconomicgovernance.org [last accessed 30 January 2008].Google Scholar
Campbell, T. (1996) The Legal Theory of Ethical Positivism. Brookfield, VT: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Cassella, A. (2001) ‘Product Standards and International Trade: Harmonisation through Private Coalitions?’, Kyklos 54(2–3): 243–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Central Intelligence Agency (2008) Fact Book on Nigeria. www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ni.html [last accessed 12 January 2008].Google Scholar
Cotterrell, R. (1983) ‘The Sociological Concept of Law’, Journal of Law & Society 10(2): 241–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, R. (1986) ‘Violence and the Word’, Yale Law Journal 95: 1601–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, K. and Kruse, M. (2007) ‘Taking Measure of the Law: The Case of the Doing Business Project’, Law & Social Inquiry 32(4): 1095–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (2002) Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (1992) ‘What is Moral Maturity? Towards a Phenomenology of Ethical Expertise’, in Ogilvy, J. (ed.) Revisioning Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York, 111–32.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (2007a) ‘The Return of the Myth of the Mental’, Inquiry 50 (4): 352–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dreyfus, H. (2007b) ‘Response to McDowell’, Inquiry 50 (4): 371–77.Google Scholar
Dupuy, P.-M. (2005) ‘Some Reflections on Contemporary International Law and the Appeal to Universal Values: A Response to Martti Koskenniemi’, The European Journal of International Law 16 (1): 131–37.Google Scholar
Elson, D and Nilufer, C. (2000) ‘The Social Content of Macroeconomic Policies’, World Development 28 (7): 1347–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, C. (2007) ‘Institutions for Intuitive Man’, Working Paper Series of the Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods 12. http://www.coll.mpg.de/pdf_dat/2007_12online.pdf [last accessed 31 January 2008].Google Scholar
Federal Republic Of Nigeria (2007) ‘Legal Notice on Publication of the 2006 Census Report’, Federal Republic of Nigeria Official Gazette. Lagos. 94: 19 January 2007.Google Scholar
Fesmire, S. (2003) John Dewey and the Moral Imagination: Pragmatism in Ethics. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
Flanagan, O. (1991) Varieties of Moral Personality: Ethics and Psychological Realism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Footer, M. E. (2001) ‘Developing Country Practice in the Matter of WTO Dispute Settlement?’, Journal of World Trade 35 (1): 55–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabilondo, J. S. P. (2001) ‘Developing Countries in the WTO Dispute Settlement Procedures’, Journal of World Trade 35(4): 483–88.Google Scholar
Gallagher, P. (2000) Guide to the WTO and Developing Countries. Dordrecht: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Golub, S. (2003) ‘Beyond Rule of Law Orthodoxy: The Legal Empowerment Alternative’, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace Rule of Law Series: Democracy and Rule of Law Project 41. www.carnegieendowment.org/files/wp41.pdf [last accessed 11 October 2007].Google Scholar
Goodin, R. (ed.) (1996) The Theory of Institutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gradstein, M. (1993) ‘Rent Seeking and the Provisioning of Public Goods’, The Economic Journal 103 (420): 1236–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, D. (2006) ‘Water and Electricity in Nigeria’, Public Services International Research Unit, University of Greenwich Report. http://www.psiru.org/reports/2006-09-WE-Nigeria.doc [last accessed 3 November 2008].Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1968) Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1994) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A and HonorÉ, T. (1985) Causation in the Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Heiskanen, V. (2004) ‘The Regulatory Philosophy of International Trade Law’, Journal of World Trade 38 (1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helleiner, G. (2000/1) ‘Markets, Politics, and Globalisation: Can the Global Economy be Civilised?’, Munk Centre for International Studies Working Paper. www.utoronto.ca/cis/working_papers/2000-1.pdf [last accessed 30 January 2008].Google Scholar
Herman, B. (2007) Moral Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2006a) Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, adopted by the International Law Commission at its Fifty-eighth session. http://www.un.org/law/ilc/ [last accessed 24 May 2007].Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. (2006b) From Apology to Utopia: the Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacey, N. (2006) ‘Analytical Jurisprudence Versus Descriptive Sociology Revisited’, Texas Law Review 89: 945–82.Google Scholar
Maccormick, N. (1989) ‘The Ethics of Legalism’, Ratio Juris 2 (2): 184–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcdowell, J. (2007a) ‘What Myth?’, Inquiry 50 (4): 338–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcdowell, J. (2007b) ‘Response to Dreyfus’, Inquiry 50 (4): 366–70.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1974) On Liberty. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Morgan, B. (2007) ‘Undoing Legal Violence: Walter Benjamin’s and Giorgio Agamben’s Aesthetics of Pure MeansJournal of Law and Society 24(1): 4664.Google Scholar
Murdoch, I. (1970) The Sovereignty of the Good. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nigeria National Planning Commission (2004a). Meeting Everyone’s Needs: The National Economic Empowerment Development Strategy. Abuja.Google Scholar
Nigeria National Planning Commission. (2004b) National Economic Empowerment Development Strategy Draft. Abuja.Google Scholar
Nöe, A. (2005) ‘Against Intellectualism’, Analysis 65 (4): 278–90.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1983) ‘Flawed Crystals: James’s The Golden Bowl and Literature as Moral Philosophy’, New Literary History 15(1): 2550.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1986) The Fragility of Goodness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2007) ‘On Moral Progress: A Response to Richard Rorty’, University of Chicago Law Review 74: 939–60.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. (2008) ‘New Trade Politics after the Doha Round’. www.graduateinstitute.ch [last accessed 18 January 2008].Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1983) ‘Taking Rules Seriously – A Response to Martha Nussbaum’, New Literary History 15(1): 193200.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, B. (1999) ‘International Law and the Development Encounter: Violence and Resistance at the Margins’, American Society of International Law Proceedings 93: 16–27.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittich, K. (2004) ‘The Future of Law and Development: Second Generation Reforms and the Incorporation of the Social’, Michigan Journal of International Law 26: 199–243.Google Scholar
Roessler, F. (2005) ‘Special and Differential Treatment of Developing Countries under the WTO Dispute Settlement System’. http://ctrc.sice.oas.org/TRC/Articles/Roessler.pdf [last accessed 30 March 2009].Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949) The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. (1954) ‘The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure’, Review of Economics and Statistics 36 (4): 387–89.Google Scholar
Selznick, P. (1957) Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1999) Development as Freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Shklar, J. (1986) Legalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. (2002) Globalisation and its Discontents. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, B. (2006) Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tamanaha, B. (2008) ‘The Dark Side of the Relationship between the Rule of Law and Liberalism’, NYU Journal of Law and Liberty 33(3): 516–47.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Programme (2006) Human Development Index. http://hdrstats.undp.org/countries/country_fact_sheets/cty_fs_NGA.html [last accessed 12 January 2008].Google Scholar
Veitch, S. (2007) Law and Irresponsibility: On the Legitimation of Human Suffering. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Victor, B and Cullen, J. (1988) ‘The Organisational Bases of Ethical Work Climates’, Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 101–125.Google Scholar
Vidaver-cohen, D. (1998) ‘Moral Climate in Business Firms: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis and Change’, Journal of Business Ethics 17: 1211–26.Google Scholar
Waluchow, W. (2006) A Common Law Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, S. (2005) An Anthology. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
World Bank (2004) Making Services Work for Poor People. Washington: World Development Report.Google Scholar
World Bank (ongoing) Common Development Framework. www.worldbank.org/cdf.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (2008) Health Systems and Service Delivery in Nigeria. www.who.int/countries/nga/areas/health_systems/en/index.html [last accessed 12 January 2008].Google Scholar
Yarrow, G. (1999) ‘A Theory of Privatisation: Or Why bureaucrats are Still in Business’, World Development 27(1): 157–68.Google Scholar