Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:33:33.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The geographies of justice in Portugal: redefining the judiciary's territories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2019

Patrícia Branco*
Affiliation:
Centro de Estudos Sociais/CES, Colégio de S. Jerónimo, Portugal
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In this paper, I examine the current geographical location of Portuguese courts and the effects this territorial redefinition has had on the relationships between the justice system and the territories/populations in a context in which external and internal political factors, rather than a mere need to improve the justice system, have played a major role. Such an analysis entails three key elements: the geographic impacts on access to justice, in view of the emblematic presence of the state in the territories, both contrasted with the conflict between specialisation and the proximity of jurisdiction.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Associação Sindical dos Juízes Portugueses (ASJP) (2014) Implementação da reforma judiciária. Condições de higiene, funcionalidade e segurança dos tribunais de primeira instância. Available at http://www.asjp.pt/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Piores-Tribunais_5-Novembro-2014.pdf (accessed 23 January 2019).Google Scholar
Avritzer, L et al. (2014) Cartografia da justiça no Brasil. São Paulo: Saraiva.Google Scholar
Baxter, J and Yoon, A (2014) No lawyer for a hundred miles? Mapping the new geography of access of justice in Canada. Osgoode Legal Studies Research Paper Series 3. Available at http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/olsrps/3 (accessed 31 May 2019).Google Scholar
Boletim da Ordem dos Advogados (BOA) (2015) 1 ano. Novo Mapa Judiciário. Available at http://issuu.com/ordemadvogados/docs/oa_130 (accessed 23 January 2019).Google Scholar
Branco, P (2016) Os tribunais e a comunidade: uma questão política de acesso ao direito e à justiça. In Rebouças, GM et al. (eds), Experiências Compartilhadas de Acesso à Justiça: Reflexões teóricas e práticas. Santa Cruz do Sul: Essere nel Mondo, pp. 3350.Google Scholar
Chappe, N and Obidzinski, M (2013) The Impact of the Number of Courts on the Demand for Trials, Working Paper 2013-1. CRESE-Université de Franche-Comté. Available at http://crese.univ-fcomte.fr/WP-2013-01.pdf (accessed 23 January 2019).Google Scholar
Commaille, J (2015) À quoi nous sert le droit ? Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Costeira, MJ (2015) O novo modelo de gestão dos tribunais: um ano depois. Julgar 27, 5574.Google Scholar
Dias, JP (2016) The transition to a democratic Portuguese judicial system: (delaying) changes in the legal culture. International Journal of Law in Context 12, 2441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, JP and Gomes, C (2018) Judicial reforms ‘under pressure’: the new map/organisation of the Portuguese judicial system. Utrecht Law Review 14, 174186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Direção Geral da Administração da Justiça (DGAJ) (2012) Ensaio para a reorganização da estrutura judiciária. Available at https://www.portugal.gov.pt/media/440463/ensaio_reorganiza__o_da_estrutura_judici_ria.pdf (accessed 23 January 2019).Google Scholar
Economides, K (2012) Centre-periphery tensions in legal theory and practice: can law and lawyers resist urban imperialism? International Journal of Rural Law and Policy 2, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espinosa, R, Desrieux, C and Wan, H (2017) Fewer courts, less justice? Evidence from the 2008 French reform of labor courts. European Journal of Law and Economics 43, 195237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) (2013) Guidelines on the Creation of Judicial Maps to Support Access to Justice within a Quality Judicial System. Available at http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/quality/2013_7_cepej_Judicial_maps_guidelines_en.pdf (accessed 23 January 2019).Google Scholar
European Network of Councils for the Judiciary (ENCJ) (2013) Judicial Reform in Europe. Report 20112012. Available at https://www.encj.eu/images/stories/pdf/GA/Dublin/encj_report_judicial_reform_def.pdf (accessed 23 January 2019).Google Scholar
European Union (2017) Quality of Public Administration: A Toolbox for Practitioners. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/esf/main.jsp?catId=&langId=en&keywords=&langSel=&pubType=434 (accessed 31 May 2019).Google Scholar
Ferraris, V (2014) L'accesso alla giustizia. In Anastasia, S, Calderone, V and Fanoli, L (eds), L'articolo 3: Primo Rapporto sullo stato dei diritti in Italia. Rome: Ediesse, pp. 107118.Google Scholar
Fix-Fierro, H (2003) Courts, Justice and Efficiency. Oxford and Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Garoupa, N (2012) Tribunais, Revista XXI, Ter Opinião, 7479.Google Scholar
Gaspar, H (2015) A reorganização judicial de 2014 (o tempo, o modo e as culturas: cruzamento de desafios). Julgar 27, 1936.Google Scholar
Gomes, C (2013) Democracia, tribunais e a reforma do mapa judiciário: contributos para o debate. Julgar 20, 8193.Google Scholar
Gramckow, H and Walsh, B (2013) Developing specialized court services: international experiences and lessons learned. Justice and Development Working Paper Series 24. Available at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/688441468335989050/pdf/819460WP0Devel00Box379851B00PUBLIC0.pdf (accessed 31 May 2019).Google Scholar
Liccardo, P (2014) I territori e la legge? In Castelli, C et al. (eds), Giustizia, Territorio e governo dell'innovazione. Rome: Carocci Editore, pp. 1524.Google Scholar
Mak, E (2008) Balancing territoriality and functionality: specialization as a tool for reforming jurisdiction in the Netherlands, France and Germany. International Journal for Court Administration 2, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moury, C and Standring, A (2017) ‘Going beyond the Troika’: power and discourse in Portuguese austerity politics. European Journal of Political Research 56, 660679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, GY (2011) A discipline of judicial governance? Utrecht Law Review 7, 102116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noreau, P (2009) Révolutionner la justice. Constats, mutations et perspectives. Montréal: Les Éditions Thémis.Google Scholar
Pereira, Coutinho F (2016) Austerity on the loose in Portugal: European judicial restraint in times of crisis. Perspectives on Federalism 8, 105132.Google Scholar
Ribeiro Correia, PMA and Videira, SA (2015) Troika's Portuguese Ministry of Justice experiment: an empirical study on the success story of the civil enforcement actions. International Journal For Court Administration 7, 3750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocha, P (2015) (Novo) Mapa judiciário. Julgar 27, 193204.Google Scholar
Santos, BS (2014a) Para uma revolução democrática da justiça. Coimbra: Almedina.Google Scholar
Santos, S (2014b) Novas reformas, velhos debates: análise das políticas de justiça e dos seus impactos no sistema judicial. Configurações 13, 1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, JC et al. (2019) Location of courts of justice: the making of the new judiciary map of Portugal. European Journal of Operational Research 272, 608620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomé Galo, JM (2015) Um balanço no primeiro ano da reforma do sistema judiciário: uma visão a partir do interior do País. Justiça com A 7. Available at http://www.justicacoma.com/edicao.php?id=15 (accessed 31 May 2019).Google Scholar
Van Dijk, F and Dumbrava, H (2013) Judiciary in times of scarcity. International Journal for Court Administration 5, 1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verzelloni, L (2014) Il confronto con l'Europa: giustizia e territorio. In Castelli, C et al. (eds), Giustizia, Territorio e governo dell'innovazione. Rome: Carocci Editore, pp. 2531.Google Scholar