Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:05:51.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bioequity – Property and the Human Body - ByNils Hoppe, Farnham: Ashgate, 2009. 194pp.ISBN978-0-7546-7280-7£ 55.00 Website price £49.50

Review products

ByNils Hoppe, Farnham: Ashgate, 2009. 194pp.ISBN978-0-7546-7280-7£ 55.00 Website price £49.50

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2010

Donna Dickenson
Donna Dickenson*
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 2010 , pp. 397 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agamben, Giorgio(1998) Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Daniel Heller-Rozen. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Boggio, Andrea(2005) ‘Charitable Trusts and Human Research Genetic Databases: The Way Forward?’, Genomics, Society and Policy 1: 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnovsky, Marcy(2008) ‘Eggs, Wombs and the Economy: Hard Times Fuel a Buyer’s Market’, www.biopoliticaltimes.rsvp1.com, 8 December.Google Scholar
Dickenson, Donna(2009) Body Shopping: Converting Body Parts to Profit. Oxford: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Downey, Candace L. and Bewley, Susan (2009) ‘Third Stage Practices and the Neonate’, Fetal and Maternal Medicine Review 20: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edozien, Leroy C.(2006) ‘NHS Maternity Units Should Not Encourage Commercial Banking of Umbilical Cord Blood’, British Medical Journal 333: 801–804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gottlieb, Karen(1998) ‘Human Biological Samples and the Law of Property: The Trust as a Model for Biological Repositories’ in Weir, Robert (ed.), Stored Tissue Samples: Ethical, Legal and Public Policy Implications. Iowa City: Iowa University Press, 183–97.Google Scholar
Kramer, W., Schneider, J. and Schultz, N. (2009) ‘US Oocyte Donors: A Retrospective Study of Medical and Psychosocial Issues’, Human Reproduction online, 3 September, 10.1093/humrep/dep309.Google Scholar
ROYAL COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNAECOLOGISTS SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE(2001) Opinion Paper No. 2: Cord Blood Banking. London: RCOG.Google Scholar
ROYAL COLLEGE OF OBSTETRICIANS AND GYNAECOLOGISTS SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE(2006) Opinion Paper 2: Umbilical Cord Blood Banking. London: RCOG.Google Scholar
Waldby, Catherine and Cooper, Melinda (2008) ‘The Biopolitics of Reproduction: Post-Fordist Biotechnology and Women’s Reproductive Labour’, Australian Feminist Studies 23: 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldby, Catherine and Mitchell, Robert (2006) Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Winickoff, David and Winickoff, Richard (2003) ‘The Charitable Trust as a Model for Genomic Biobanks’, New England Journal of Medicine 349: 1180–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar