Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T13:23:52.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ambiguous symbolisms: recognising customary marriage and same-sex marriage in South Africa*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2011

Nicola Barker
Affiliation:
University of Reading

Abstract

In this article I draw on the South African legal context to critique the argument that same-sex marriage would provide ‘equal recognition’ for same-sex relationships. I highlight the ways in which, despite strong equality provisions in the South African Constitution and an apparent commitment to substantive rather than merely formal equality, both customary marriage and same-sex marriage continue to be subordinate to heterosexual civil marriage. I then broaden my analysis to consider the extent to which this would also be the case in other jurisdictions, particularly the UK. Drawing on the Butler/Fraser debate on recognition and redistribution, I argue that there is a connection between misrecognition and material disadvantage that goes unacknowledged in ‘symbolic recognition’ claims for same-sex marriage. The critiques of ‘marriage equality’ should sound a warning not only to same-sex marriage advocates but also more generally to those who would seek ‘equal recognition’ through law reform.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Susan B. Boyd, Davina Cooper, Marie Fox, Andrew Francis, Rosie Harding, Didi Herman and Ambreena Manji for their feedback on earlier drafts of this article. I would also like to thank the organisers and attendees at the ‘Families on the Faultlines’ conference at the University of California, Berkeley (April 2010), as well as the Centre for Feminist Legal Studies at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, for giving me the opportunity to present some of the ideas in this article and for their thought-provoking questions and comments.

References

Andrews, Penelope E. (2007) ‘“Big Love”? The Recognition of Customary Marriages in South Africa’, Washington & Lee Law Review 64: 1483–97.Google Scholar
Andrews, Penelope E. (2009) ‘Who's Afraid of Polygamy? Exploring the Boundaries of Family, Equality and Custom in South Africa’, Journal of Law and Family Studies 11: 303331.Google Scholar
Auchmuty, Rosemary (2004) ‘Same-Sex Marriage Revived: Feminist Critique and Legal Strategy’, Feminism and Psychology 14(1): 101126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auchmuty, Rosemary (2007) ‘Out of the Shadows: Feminist Silence and Liberal Law’, in Munro, V. E. and Stychin, C. F. (eds), Sexuality and the Law: Feminist Engagements. Oxford: Routledge, 91124Google Scholar
Barker, Nicola (2012) Not the Marrying Kind: Feminist Critiques of Marriage and the Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Relationships. Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Nicola (2008) ‘Beyond (Same-Sex) Marriage and Beyond Conjugality: Spinster Sisters and the Recognition of Non-Sexual Relationships in Hawaii, Tasmania and the UK’ (unpublished conference paper, on file with author).Google Scholar
Baird, Robert M. and Rosenbaum, Stuart E. (eds) (2004) Same-Sex Marriage: The Moral and Legal Debate, 2nd edn.New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Bekker, J. C. (2001a) ‘Requirements for validity of customary marriages’, South African Journal of Ethnology 24(2): 4147.Google Scholar
Bekker, J. C. (2001b) ‘Recognition of Customary Marriages Act: An EvaluationSouth African Journal of Ethnology 24(2): 4850.Google Scholar
Bennett, T. W. (1991) ‘The Compatibility of African Customary Law and Human Rights’, Acta Juridica 1835.Google Scholar
Bennett, T. W. (1994) ‘The Equality Clause and Customary Law’, South African Journal on Human Rights 10: 122–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonthuys, Elsje (2002) ‘Accommodating Gender, Race, Culture and Religion: Outside Legal Subjectivity’, South African Journal on Human Rights 18: 4159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonthuys, Elsje (2007) ‘Race and Gender in the Civil Union Act’, South African Journal on Human Rights 23: 526–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, Susan B. (1999) ‘Family, Law and Sexuality: Feminist Engagements’, Social and Legal Studies 8(3): 369–90.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1997) ‘Merely Cultural’, Social Text 52/53, 15(3/4): 265–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, David L. (2000) ‘Civilizing the Natives: Marriage in Post-Apartheid South Africa’, Daedalus 129(4): 101124.Google ScholarPubMed
Cohen, Cathy J. (1997) ‘Punks, Bulldaggers and Welfare Queens: The Radical Potential of Queer Politics?’, GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 3: 437–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conaghan, Joanne and Grabham, Emily (2007) ‘Sexuality and the Citizen Carer’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 58(3): 325–42.Google Scholar
Constitutional Marriage Amendment Campaign (2006) ‘Let's Unite in Prayer for the Defeat of the Civil Unions Bill’, 19 July 2006. Available at: www.defendmarriage.co.za/index.htm.Google Scholar
De Vos, Pierre (2007) ‘The “Inevitability” of Same-Sex Marriage in South Africa's Post-Apartheid State’, South African Journal on Human Rights 23: 432–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diduck, Alison (2003) Law's Families. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Dobson, James (2005) ‘An Open Letter to South Africans on Same-sex Marriage’. Available at: www.cft.org.za/articles/dobson_gay_marriage_sa.htm.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. (1996) The Case for Same-Sex Marriage: From Sexual Liberty to Civilized Commitment. New York and London: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Ettelbrick, Paula (1989/1997) ‘Since When is Marriage a Path to Liberation?’, in Sullivan, A. (ed.), Same-Sex Marriage Pro and Con: A Reader, New York: Vintage Books, 118–24.Google Scholar
Farrow, Kenyon (2007) ‘Is Gay Marriage Anti-Black???Chickenbones: A Journal for Literary and Artistic African-American Themes.Google Scholar
Fineman, Martha A. (1995) The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family and other Twentieth Century Tragedies. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (1997a) Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the ‘Postsocialist’ Condition. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (1997b) ‘Heterosexism, Misrecognition and Capitalism: A Response to Judith Butler’, Social Text 52/53, 15(3/4): 279–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, Nancy (2003) ‘Rethinking Recognition: Overcoming Displacement and Reification in Cultural Politics’, in Hobson, B. (ed.), Recognition Struggles and Social Movements: Contested Identities, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2132.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy and Honneth, Axel (2003) Redistribution or Recognition? A Political Philosophical Exchange. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Griffiths, Anne M. O. (1997) In the Shadow of Marriage: Gender and Justice in an African Community. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gunkel, Henriette (2010) The Cultural Politics of Female Sexuality in South Africa. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haritaworn, Jin (with T. Tauqir and E. Erdem) (2008) ‘Gay Imperialism: Gender and Sexuality Discourse in the “War on Terror”’, in Kuntsman, A. and Miyake, E. (eds.), Out of Place: Interrogating Silences in Queerness/Raciality. York: Raw Nerve Books, 7195.Google Scholar
Herman, Didi (1994) Rights of Passage: Struggles for Lesbian and Gay Equality. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, Tracy E., Fenrich, Jeanmarie and Tanzer, Ziona (2007) ‘Gender Equality and Customary Marriage: Bargaining in the Shadow of Post-Apartheid Legal Pluralism’, Fordham International Law Journal 30: 1653–708.Google Scholar
Hooks, Bell (1988) Talking back: thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Human Rights Campaign (2009) ‘A Message from the Human Rights Campaign Foundation President’, in Answers to Questions about Marriage Equality. Available at: www.hrc.org/documents/HRC_Foundation_Answers_to_Questions_About_Marriage_Equality_2009.pdf.Google Scholar
Kaganas, Felicity and Murray, Christina (1991) ‘Law, Women and the Family: The Question of Polygyny in a New South Africa’, Acta Juridica 116–34.Google Scholar
Kandaswamy, Priya (2008) ‘State Austerity and the Racial Politics of Same-Sex Marriage in the US’, Sexualities 11(6): 706725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law Commission (2007) Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown. Law Commission No. 307.Google Scholar
LenonSuzanne, J. Suzanne, J. (2005) ‘Marrying Citizens! Raced Subjects? Re-thinking the Terrain of Equal Marriage Discourse’, Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 17: 405421.Google Scholar
LenonSuzanne, J. Suzanne, J. (2008) ‘What's So Civil About Marriage? The Racial Pedagogy of Same-Sex Marriage in Canada’, Darkmatter 3: 2736.Google Scholar
Louw, Ronald (2001) ‘Mkhumbane and New Traditions of (Un)African Same-Sex Weddings’, in Morrell, R. (ed.), Changing Men in South Africa. London and New York: Zed Books, 287–96.Google Scholar
Luluaki, John Y. (1997) ‘Customary Marriage Laws in the Commonwealth: A Comparison Between Papua New Guinea and Anglophonic Africa’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 11: 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamdani, Mahmood (1996) Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Manji, Ambreena (1999) ‘Imagining Women's “Legal World”: Towards a Feminist Theory of Legal Pluralism in Africa’, Social and Legal Studies 8(4): 435–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinley, Jesse (2008) ‘Same-Sex Marriage Ban is Tied to Obama Factor’, New York Times, 20 September 2008. Available at: www.nytimes.com/2008/09/21/us/politics/21gay.html.Google Scholar
Mkhize, Nonhlanhla (2008) ‘(Not) in My Culture: Thoughts on Same-sex Marriage and African Practices’, in Judge, M., Manion, A. and de Waal, S. (eds), To Have and To Hold: The Making of Same-Sex Marriage in South Africa. Cape Town: Fanele, 97106.Google Scholar
Moore, Matthew (2008) ‘Barack Obama May Have Helped California Proposition 8 Gay Marriage Ban Pass’, The Telegraph, 6 November 2008. Available at: www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/3388430/Barack-Obama-may-have-helped-California-Proposition-8-gay-marriage-ban-pass.html.Google Scholar
Morgan, Ruth and Wieringa, Saskia (2005) Tommy Boys, Lesbian Men and Ancestral Wives: Female Same-Sex Practices in Africa. Johannesburg: Jacana Media.Google Scholar
Oppermann, Brenda (2006) ‘The Impact of Legal Pluralism on Women's Status: An Examination of Marriage Laws in Egypt, South Africa, and the United States’, Hastings Women's Law Journal 17: 6592.Google Scholar
Parpart, Jane (1988) ‘Sexuality and Power on the Zambian Copperbelt 1926–1964’, in Sticher, S. and Parpart, J. (eds.), Patriarchy and Class: African Women in the Home and the Workforce. Colorado: Westview Press, 3042.Google Scholar
Peart, N. S. (1982) ‘Section 11(1) of the Black Administration Act No 38 of 1927: The Application of the Repugnancy Clause’, Acta Juridica 99116.Google Scholar
Pieterse, Marius (2001) ‘It's a “Black Thing”: Upholding Culture and Customary Law in a Society Founded on Non-Racialism’, South African Journal on Human Rights 17: 364403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillay, Karrisha (2007) ‘Litigating Socio-Economic Rights in South Africa: How Far Will the Courts Go?’, in Young, M., Boyd, S. B., Brodsky, G. and Day, S. (eds), Poverty: Rights, Social Citizenship, and Legal Activism. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press, 240–59.Google Scholar
Posel, D. (1995) ‘State, Power and Gender: Conflict over the Registration of African Customary Marriage in South Africa c.1910–1970’, Journal of Historical Sociology 8(3): 223–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Probert, Rebecca (2007) ‘Hyde v. Hyde: Defining or Defending Marriage?Child and Family Law Quarterly 19(3): 322–36.Google Scholar
Robson, Ruthann (1995) ‘Convictions: Theorizing Lesbians and Criminal Justice’, in Herman, D. and Stychin, C. (eds), Legal Inversions. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 180–94.Google Scholar
Smart, Carol (1989) Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Bradley S. and Robinson, J. A. (2008) ‘The South African Civil Union Act 2006: Progressive Legislation with Regressive Implications?’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 22: 356–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stacey, Judith and Meadow, Tey (2009) ‘New Slants on the Slippery Slope: The Politics of Polygamy and Gay Family Rights in South Africa and the United States’, Politics and Society 37: 167202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stonewall, (2004) ‘Parliamentary Briefing: Civil Partnership Bill, House of Commons Second Reading’, 12 October 2004. Available at: www.stonewall.org.uk/documents/oahq_Commons_Second_Reading_Sep_2004.doc.Google Scholar
Stychin, Carl F. (2006) ‘Not (Quite) A Horse and Carriage: The Civil Partnership Act 2004’, Feminist Legal Studies 14(1): 7986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stychin, Carl F. (2009) ‘Faith in the Future: Sexuality, Religion and the Public Sphere’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 29(4): 729–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trengove-Jones, Tim (2008) ‘Marriage and Murder’, in Judge, M., Manion, A. and de Waal, S. (eds), To Have and To Hold: The Making of Same-Sex Marriage in South Africa. Auckland Park: Fanele, 182–92.Google Scholar
Warner, Michael (2000) The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics and the Ethics of Queer Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, J., Heaphy, B. and Donovan, C. (2001) Same-Sex Intimacies: Families of Choice and Other Life Experiments. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Whelpton, F. P. van R. and Vorster, L. P. (2001) ‘Dissolution of Customary MarriagesSouth African Journal of Ethnology 24(2): 5661.Google Scholar
Wing, A. K. (2008) ‘The South African Constitution as a Role Model for the United States’, Harvard Blackletter Law Journal 24: 73.Google Scholar
Young, Claire and Boyd, Susan (2006) ‘Losing the Feminist Voice? Debates on the Legal Recognition of Same Sex Partnerships in Canada’, Feminist Legal Studies 14: 213–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar