Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T13:20:14.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transgenerational association: extending the notion of the person - RETRACTION1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 July 2009

Anthony Armatrudo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper develops the idea of transgenerational association. It addresses intrapersonal distributions of wellbeing over time. It develops the notion of temporal distributions between generations, and posits that it is possible to overcome the problems that obstruct ethical individualism. It argues that corporate personality allows us to compare distributions between generations to distributions between the stages of one person.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 93 - 106
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

The author is grateful to Dr Felicia Herrschaft of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt and Dr Magnus Ryan of Peterhouse, Cambridge for their comments on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

Barry, B. (1999) ‘Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice’ in Dobson, A. (ed.) Fairness and Futurity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, E. (1987[1790]) Reflections on the Revolution in France, ed. Pocock, J. G. A. . Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Dahrendorf, R. (1990) Reflections on the Revolution in Europe. New York: Time Books.Google Scholar
De-shalit, A. (1995) Why Posterity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
De-shalit, A. (2000) The Environment: Between Theory and Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, A. (1998) Justice and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herzog, D. (1991) ‘Puzzling Through Burke’, Political Theory 19(3): 336–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jefferson, T. (1984[1789]) ‘The Earth Belongs to the Living’, Letter to James Madison (6 September 1789), in Peterson, M. D. (ed.) Writings. New York: The Library of America, 959–64.Google Scholar
Kavka, G. S. (1978) ‘The Futurity Problem’ in Sikora, R. I. and Barry, B. (eds) Obligations to Future Generations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Macintyre, A. (1981) After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. (1970) The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1984) ‘Twilight of the Idols: Or How One Philosophizes With A Hammer’ in Kaufman, W. (ed.) The Portable Nietzsche. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
O’neill, J. (1993) Ecology, Policy and Politics: Human Well-Being and the Natural World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Page, E. (1999) ‘Intergenerational Justice and Climate Change’, Political Studies XLVII: 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, T. (1974[1791]) Rights of Man, ed. Foner, P. S. . Secaucus: The Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1992) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sauvé, K. (1995) ‘Gauthier, Property Rights, and Future Generations’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25(2): 163–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. (1979) ‘Utilitarianism and Welfarism’, The Journal of Philosophy 76(9): 463–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slote, M. (1983) ‘Goods and Lives’ in Goods and Virtues. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 9–37.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1989) Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Velleman, J. D. (2000) ‘Well-being and Time’ in The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 170–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, S. R. (1997) ‘Happiness and Meaning: Two Aspects of the Good Life’, Social Philosophy and Policy 14(1): 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar