Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:43:47.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Political liberalism and French national identity in the wake of the face-veiling law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 October 2013

Eoin Daly
Eoin Daly*
Affiliation:
University College Dublin
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Political liberalism suggests state power must be exercised and justified on terms all citizens can reasonably be expected to endorse, independently of their comprehensive identities or worldviews. For Rawls, a democratic community cannot be united by any shared ends or identities other than those connected with the political conception of justice itself. Republican political thought often seems to undermine this ‘liberal principle of legitimacy’ through its stronger demands of social cohesion and participative civic virtue. Conversely, however, it generally seeks to define citizenship independently of any non-political commonalities citizens might be assumed to share. This theoretical tension was reflected in recent French republican discourses on Islam, gender and national identity. France's recent prohibition on public face-veiling coincided with an officially orchestrated debate on national identity which seemed to challenge the traditional republican conception of national identity as a purely civic and political construct. While couched in republican terminologies, these recent discourses seemed to understand the principle of laïcité, or constitutional secularism, as a bulwark for the pre-political dimensions of national identity. Accordingly, this article outlines how these discourses on religion and gender illuminated tensions and contradictions within the prevailing republican account of national identity.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 9 , Special Issue 3: Complex transformations – gender, religious subjectivities and the new politics of belonging , September 2013 , pp. 366 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balibar, Etienne (1991) ‘Faut-il qu'une laïcité soit ouverte ou fermée?’, Mots. Les langages du politique 27: 73–80.Google Scholar
Barnard, Frederick M. (1983) ‘National Culture and Political Legitimacy: Herder and Rousseau’, Journal of the History of Ideas 44: 231–53.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian (2001) Culture and Equality: An Egalitarian Critique of Multiculturalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baubérot, Jean (2004) Laïcité 1905–2005: entre passion et raison. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Baubérot, Jean (2006) L'intégrisme républicain contre la laïcité. Paris: Editions de l'Aube.Google Scholar
Baumeister, Andrea (2007) ‘Diversity and Unity: The Problem with “Constitutional Patriotism”’, European Journal of Political Theory 6: 483–503.Google Scholar
Bell, David A. and Baggio, Pauline (2002) ‘Le caractère national et l'imaginaire républicain au XVIIIe siècle’, Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 4: 867–88.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla (2008) Review of Parité: Sexual Equality and the Crisis of French Universalism by Scott, Joan W., Hypatia 23: 220–25.Google Scholar
Bereni, Laure (2007) ‘French Feminists Renegotiate Republican Universalism: The Gender Parity Campaign’, French Politics 5: 191–209.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, Pierre (2008–2009) ‘On the Secularization of the Public Square: Jews in France and in the United States’, Cardozo Law Review 30: 2431–43.Google Scholar
Bonal, Cordélia and Equy, Laure (2009) ‘L'identité nationale selon Sarkozy’, Libération, 2 November, p. 9.Google Scholar
Bouzar, Dounia (2011) ‘Ce que veulent les musulmans? La loi de 1905, c'est tout’, Le Monde, 1 April, p. 15.Google Scholar
Bui-xuan, Olivia (2004) Le Droit Public Français entre Universalisme et Différencialisme. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Calvès, Gwénaële (2002) ‘“Il n'y a pas de race ici”: le modèle français à l'épreuve de l'intégration européenne’, Critique internationale 17: 173–86.Google Scholar
Calvès, Gwénaële (2008) ‘L'hésitation des politiques de lutte contre les discriminations’, CNAF: Informations sociales 148: 34–45.Google Scholar
Conseil d'etat (2010) Etude relative aux possibilités juridiques d'interdiction du port du voile intégral. Paris: Conseil d'Etat.Google Scholar
Daly, Eoin (2010) ‘Religious Liberty and the Rawlsian Idea of Legitimacy: The French Laïcité Project between Comprehensive and Political Liberalisms’, Religion and Human Rights 5: 11–41.Google Scholar
Daly, Eoin (2011) ‘Non-domination as a Primary Good: Re-thinking the Frontiers of the ‘Political’ in Rawls's Political Liberalism’, Jurisprudence 1: 37–72.Google Scholar
Daly, Eoin (2012) ‘Laïcité, Gender Equality and the Politics of Non-domination’, European Journal of Political Theory 11: 292–323.Google Scholar
Descola, Phillipe (2009) ‘Quand Lévi-Strauss dénonçait l'utilisation politique de l'identité nationale’, Le Monde, 4 November, p. 16.Google Scholar
Durand, Beatrice (2010) La Nouvelle Idéologie Française. Paris: Editions Stock.Google Scholar
Franck, Johannès (2010) ‘Brice Hortefeux condamné pour injure raciale’, Le Monde, 4 June, p. 7.Google Scholar
French National Assembly (2010) Rapport d'information au nom de la mission d'information sur la pratique du port du voile intégral sur le territoire national. Paris: National Assembly.Google Scholar
Fréour, Pauline (2011) ‘Sarkozy: le multiculturalisme est un “échec”’, Le Figaro, 10 February, p. 6.Google Scholar
Gresh, Alain (2003) ‘Aux origins des controversies sur la laïcité’, Le Monde Diplomatique, August, p. 5.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jurgen (1999) ‘The European Nation State: On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship’, in Habermas, J., Cronin, C. and de Greiff, P. (eds), The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory. Cambridge: Polity, 105–27.Google Scholar
Honohan, Iseult (2007) ‘Civic Republicanism and the Multicultural City’, in Neill, V. W. and Schwedler, H. U. (eds), Migration and Cultural Inclusion in the European City. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 64–82.Google Scholar
Jaxel-Truer, Pierre and Vincent, Elise (2010) ‘Voile intégral, polygamie: comment un fait divers devient une controverse politique’, Le Monde, 26 April, p. 13.Google Scholar
Kahn, Pierre (2007) ‘La laïcité est-elle une valeur?’, SPIRALE – Revue de Recherches en Éducation 39: 27–39.Google Scholar
Kritzman, Laurence D. (1995) ‘Identity Crises: France, Culture and the Idea of the Nation’, Substance 24: 5–20.Google Scholar
Laborde, Cecile (2005) ‘Secular Philosophy and Muslim Headscarves in Schools’, Journal of Political Philosophy 13: 305–32.Google Scholar
Landrin, Sophie and Van Eeckhout, Laetitia (2010) ‘Identité nationale: François Fillon cherche une voie de sortie’, Le Monde, 8 January, p. 9.Google Scholar
Laurent, Samuel (2011) ‘A l'UMP, le débat sur l'islam s'enlise’, Le Monde, 1 March, p. 7.Google Scholar
Lebourg, Nicolas (2010) Interview by Abel Mestre and Caroline Monnot, Droite(s) Extrême(s), weblog. Available at: http://droites-extremes.blog.lemonde.fr/2010/12/20/la-genese-du-discours-identitaire-sur-lislam-entretien-avec-nicolas-lebourg-chercheur-a-luniversite-de-perpignan/ (last accessed 21 November 2011).Google Scholar
Maynor, John (2002) ‘Without Regret: The Comprehensive Nature of Non-domination’, Politics 22: 51–58.Google Scholar
Mill, John S. (1851/2008) Representative Government. London: Forgotten Books.Google Scholar
Möschel, Mathias (2009) ‘Race judicata: The Ban on the Use of Ethnic and Racial Statistics in France’, European Constitutional Law Review 5: 197–217.Google Scholar
Mullally, Siobhan (2011) ‘Civic Integration, Migrant Women and the Veil: At the Limits of Rights?’, Modern Law Review 74: 27–59.Google Scholar
Näsström, Sophia (2007) ‘The Legitimacy of the People’, Political Theory 35: 624–58.Google Scholar
Nicolet, Claude (2000) Histoire, Nation, République. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan M. (1989) Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Palais de l'elysée (2003) Commission de réflexion sur l'application du principe de laïcité dans la République. Paris: Elysée Palace.Google Scholar
Piquard, Alexandre (2010) ‘La fin du ministère de l'identité nationale, un leurre’, Le Monde, 15 November, p. 9.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1996) Political Liberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (1999) The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Renan, Ernest (1882) Qu'est-ce qu'une nation? Paris: Calmann Lévy.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1762/1988) Du Contrat Social. Paris: ENAG.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael (1998) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sarkozy, Nicolas (2009) ‘Respecter ceux qui arrivent, respecter ceux qui accuiellent’, Le Monde, 9 December, p. 14.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. (2007) The Politics of the Veil. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sopo, Dominique (2010) ‘Le racisme de l'extrême droite révèle son manque de “modernité”’, Le Monde, 14 December, p. 14.Google Scholar
Spektorowski, Alberto (2000) ‘The French New Right: Differentialism and the Idea of Ethnophilian Exclusionism’, Polity 33: 283–303.Google Scholar
Tawil, Emmanuel (2010) ‘Civil Religion in France: The Gallican Hypothesis’, The George Washington International Law Review 41: 827–38.Google Scholar
Vakulenko, Anastasia (2009) ‘Gender Equality as an Essential French Value: The Case of Mme M’, Human Rights Law Review 9: 143–70.Google Scholar
Viard, Jean (1996) La Nation Ebranlée. Paris: Aube.Google Scholar
Viard, Jean (2010) Fragments d'identité française. Paris: Aube.Google Scholar