Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T09:43:46.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is cheaper better? Public and private lawyers before criminal courts in Mexico City1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2016

Gustavo Fondevilla  and
Rodrigo Meneses Reyes
Gustavo Fondevilla
Affiliation:
Gustavo Fondevilla, Centre for Economic Research and Teaching (CIDE), Mexico City, Mexico. Email: [email protected]; http://ld.cide.edu/profesores
Rodrigo Meneses Reyes*
Affiliation:
Rodrigo Meneses Reyes, Centre for Economic Research and Teaching (CIDE), Mexico City, Mexico. http://ld.cide.edu/profesores
*
Contact for correspondence. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper aims to conduct a descriptive analysis of a total of 2,172 semi-structured interviews with sentenced inmates in Mexico City during 2002–2008 in order to explain how public legal defence works, how this service is evaluated by the inmates who took part in the interviews, and how the traditional division between public and private services constitutes an important distinction in the way in which criminals interact with, and are processed by, the legal system. Our findings suggest that, in the case of Mexico City: (i) to be tried by a public defender not only implies that the person accused holds a bigger chance of getting a softer sentence than those defended by private lawyers; but also, (ii) that the population will have a better perception of the justice process.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 2016 , pp. 63 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

We thank Porfirio Cruz, who assisted us in the analysis of the data.

References

Azaola, E. (1997) ‘Mujeres sentenciadas por homicidio en la ciudad de México’, Papers 51: 93–102.Google Scholar
Azaola, E. and Bergman, M. (2007) ‘De mal en peor: las condiciones de vida en las cárceles mexicanas’, Nueva sociedad 208: 118–127.Google Scholar
Baker, T., Pelfrey, W., Bedard, L., Dhungana, K., Gertz, M., and Golden, K. (2013) ‘Female Inmates’ Procedural Justice Perceptions of the Police and Courts: Is There a Spill-Over of Police Effects?’, Criminal Justice and Behavior 41: 144–162.Google Scholar
Barak, G. (1975) ‘In Defense of the Rich: The Emergence of the Public Defender’, Crime and Social Justice 3: 2–14.Google Scholar
Beltrán, I. and Piccato, P. (2004) ‘Crimen en el siglo XX: fragmentos de análisis sobre la evidencia cuantitativa’, in Kuri, A. Rodríguez and Tamayo, S. (eds), Los últimos cien años, los próximos cien años. Mexico: UAM, 13–44.Google Scholar
Bergman, M. (2011). Crimen y desempleo en México: ¿Una correlación espuria? Mexico: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, DTEJ 55.Google Scholar
Bergman, M. and Azaola, E. (2003) ‘El Sistema Penitenciario Mexicano’, UC San Diego: Center for U.S.–Mexican Studies. Online: <http://escholarship.org/uc/item/18w2r3h7> (last accessed 6 June 2014).+(last+accessed+6+June+2014).>Google Scholar
Bergman, M., Azaola, E. and Magaloni, A. (2006) Delincuencia, marginalidad y desempeño institucional: resultados de la segunda encuesta a población en reclusión en el Distrito Federal y el Estado de México. Mexico: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.Google Scholar
Blackburn, A. (2006) The Role Perception Plays in the Official Reporting of Prison Sexual Assault: An Examination of Females Incarcerated in the State of Texas. ProQuest Digital Dissertations (AAT 3250640).Google Scholar
Boyd, E. and Grant, T. (2005) ‘Is Gender a Factor in Perceived Prison Officer Competence? Male Prisoners’ Perceptions in an English Dispersal Prison’, Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health 15(1): 65–74.Google Scholar
Briceño-León, R., Villaveces, A. and Concha-Eastman, A. (2008) ‘Understanding the Uneven Distribution of the Incidence of Homicide in Latin America’, International Journal of Epidemiology 37(4): 751–757.Google Scholar
Caballero, A. and Concha, H. (2004) Diagnóstico sobre la Administración de Justicia en las Entidades Federativas. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Campesi, G. (2010) ‘Policing, Urban Poverty and Insecurity in Latin America’, Theoretical Criminology 14(4): 447–471.Google Scholar
Cano, I. (2010) ‘Racial Bias in Police Use of Lethal Force in Brazil’, Police and Practice Research 11(1): 31–43.Google Scholar
Champion, D. (1989) ‘Private Counsels and Public Defenders: A Look at Weak Cases, Prior Records, and Leniency in Plea Bargaining’, Journal of Criminal Justice 17: 253–263.Google Scholar
Cheeseman, K. and Worley, R. (2006) ‘Women on the Wing: Inmate Perceptions about Female Correctional Officer Job Competency in a Southern Prison System’, Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice 3(2): 86–106.Google Scholar
Chiricos, T. and Waldo, G. (1975) ‘Socioeconomic Status and Criminal Sentencing: An Empirical Assessment of a Conflict Proposition’, American Sociological Review 40(6): 753–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comisión De Derechos Humanos Del Distrito Federal (CDHDF) (1998) ‘Defensoría de oficio (Informe especial sobre la Defensoría de Oficio del Distrito Federal).’ Online: <http://cdhdfbeta.cdhdf.org.mx/> (last accessed 6 June 2014).+(last+accessed+6+June+2014).>Google Scholar
Connor, D. (2009) ‘Prison Wardens’ Perceptions of Sex Offenders, Sex Offender Registration, Community Notification, and Residency Restrictions.’ Online: <http://www.doc.wa.gov/aboutdoc/measuresstatistics/docs/PrisonWardensPerceptonsofSexOffenders.SexOffenderRegistration.CommunityNotification.andResid.pdf> (last accessed 6 June 2014).+(last+accessed+6+June+2014).>Google Scholar
Crank, B. (2010) ‘Adapting to Incarceration: Inmate Perceptions of Prison Life and Adjustment.’ Online: <http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/cj_theses/10> (last accessed 6 June 2014).+(last+accessed+6+June+2014).>Google Scholar
Crouch, B. (1993) ‘Is Incarceration Really Worse? Analysis of Offenders’ Preferences for Prison over Probation’, Justice Quarterly 10(1): 67–88.Google Scholar
Davis, D. (2007) ‘El factor Giuliani: delincuencia, la “cero tolerancia” en el trabajo policiaco y la transformación de la esfera pública en el centro de la ciudad de México’, Estudios Sociológicos 25(75): 639–681.Google Scholar
Domingo, P. (1999) ‘Rule of Law, Citizenship and Access to Justice in Mexico’, Mexican Studies / Estudios Mexicanos 15(1): 151–191.Google Scholar
Eckstein, S. (1998) El Estado y la Pobreza Urbana en México. Mexico: Siglo XXI.Google Scholar
Ewick, P. and Silbey, S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferrandino, Á. (2004) ‘Acceso a la Justicia’, in Pásara, L. (ed.), En busca de una justicia distinta: Experiencias de reforma en América Latina. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 377–408.Google Scholar
Fowler, S., Blackburn, A., Marquart, J. and Mullings, J. (2010) ‘Would They Officially Report an in Prison Sexual Assault? An Examination of Inmate Perceptions’, Prison Journal 90(2): 220–243.Google Scholar
Freedman, D. (2005) Statistical Models: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanson, R., Ostrom, B. and Hewitt, W. (1992) Indigent Defenders Get the Job Done and Done Well. Williamsburg, VA: National Center for State Courts.Google Scholar
Hayner, N. (1946) ‘Criminogenic Zones in Mexico City’, American Sociological Review 11(4): 428–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, M., Rubin, P. and Shepherd, J. (2005) ‘An Empirical Study of Public Defender Effectiveness: Self Selection by the Marginally Indigent’, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 3: 223–255.Google Scholar
Houtzager, P. (2005) ‘El movimiento de los sin tierra, el campo jurídico y el cambio legal en Brasil’, in Sousa Santos, B. and Rodríguez Garavito, C. (eds), El derecho y la globalización desde abajo. Mexico: Anthropos, 197–215.Google Scholar
Kitzmann, K. M. and Emery, R. E. (1993) ‘Procedural Justice and Parents’ Satisfaction in a Field Study of Child Custody Dispute Resolution’, Law and Human Behavior 17: 553–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kritzer, H. (2008) ‘To Lawyer or Not to Lawyer: Is That the Question?’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 5(4): 875–906.Google Scholar
Kruskal, W. and Wallis, W. (1952) ‘Use of Ranks in One-criterion Variance Analysis’, Journal of the American Statistical Association 47(260): 583–621.Google Scholar
Lind, A. (1994) Procedural Justice, Disputing, and Reactions to Legal Authorities. American Bar Foundation Working Paper No. 9403.Google Scholar
Lind, A. and Tyler, T. (1988) The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Méndez, J., O'donell, G. and Pinheiro, S. (1999) La (in)efectividad de la ley y la exclusión en América Latina. Buenos Aires: Paidós.Google Scholar
Mexico City Government (2012) Informe Anual de Labores 2011. Mexico: Mexico City Government.Google Scholar
Piccato, P. (2001). City of Suspects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Rajagopal, B. (2005) ‘Los límites del derecho en la globalización contrahegemónica: la Corte Suprema de la India y la lucha por el valle de Narmanda’, in Sousa Santos, B. and Rodríguez Garavito, C. (eds), El derecho y la globalización desde abajo. Mexico: Anthropos, 167–196.Google Scholar
Ríos-Figueroa, J. (2012) ‘Justice System Institutions and Corruption Control: Evidence from Latin America’, Justice System Journal 33(2): 195–214.Google Scholar
Silva, C. and Alvarado, A. (2011) ‘Relaciones de autoridad y abuso policial en la Ciudad de México’, Revista Mexicana de Sociología 73(3): 445–473.Google Scholar
Solum, L. (2004) ‘Procedural Justice’, Southern California Law Review 78: 181–321.Google Scholar
Spohn, C., Gruhl, J. and Welch, S. (1982) ‘The Effect of Race on Sentencing: A Re-examination of an Unsettled Question’, Law and Society Review 16(1): 71–88.Google Scholar
Stover, R. and Eckart, D. (1975) ‘A Systematic Comparison of Public Defenders and Private Attorneys’, American Journal of Criminal Law 3: 275–300.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. (1990) Why People Obey the Law. New Haven, CN: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. (1997) ‘The Psychology of Legitimacy: A Relational Perspective on Voluntary Deference to Authorities’, Personality and Social Psychology Review 4(1): 323–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Us Department of Health and Human Services (1979) The Belmont Report (18 April 1979). Online: <http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html#xinform> (last accessed 5 June 2014).+(last+accessed+5+June+2014).>Google Scholar
Valencia, E. (1965) La Merced: estudio ecológico y social de una zona de la ciudad de México. México: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Van Groningen, K. (1980) Aplicación de la Ley Penal y Desigualdad Social. Caracas: Editorial Jurídica Venezolana.Google Scholar
Veneziano, C., Veneziano, L. and Gill, A. (2001) ‘Perceptions of the Juvenile Justice among Adult Prison Inmates’, Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 32(3): 53–61.Google Scholar
Vilalta, C. (2008) ‘Relaciones indirectas y variables asociadas a la duración de las penas y las apelaciones en México: evidencia y comentarios’, Estudios Sociológicos 26(77): 409–433.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L. (2006) ‘Toward a Dictatorship Over the Poor? Notes on the Penalization of Poverty in Brazil’, Punishment & Society 5(2): 197–205.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (2002) ‘A Comparison of Sentencing Outcomes for Defendants with Public Defenders versus Retained Counsel in a Florida Circuit Court’, Justice System Journal 23(2): 249–259.Google Scholar
Wood, P. and May, D. (2003) ‘Race Differences in Perceptions of Sanction Severity: A Comparison of Prison with Alternatives’, Justice Quarterly 20(3): 605–631.Google Scholar