Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T08:45:01.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hanoch Dagan and the liberal concept of autonomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2022

Gregory S. Alexander
Gregory S. Alexander*
Affiliation:
A. Robert Noll Professor of Law Emeritus, Cornell University, USA
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposium
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 237 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Christman, J (2004) Relational autonomy, liberal individualism, and the social constitution of selves. Philosophical Studies 117, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christman, J and Anderson, J (2005) Introduction. In Christman, J and Anderson, J (eds), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, H (2021) A Liberal Theory of Property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankfurt, H (1988) Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. In Frankfurt, H (ed.), The Importance of What We Care About. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, T (1991) Autonomy and Self-respect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, C and Stoljar, N (2000) Introduction: autonomy reconfigured. In Mackenzie, C and Stoljar, N (eds), Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–31.Google Scholar
Ripstein, A (2009) Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, HE (2012) Property as the law of things. Harvard Law Review 125, 1691–1726.Google Scholar
Smith, HE (2004) Property and property rules. New York University Law Review 79, 1719.Google Scholar
Superson, A (2005) Deformed desires and informed desire tests. Hypathia 20, 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinrib, EJ (2012) Corrective Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, S (1987) Sanity and the metaphysics of responsibility. In Schoeman, F (ed.), Responsibility, Character and the Emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 46–62.Google Scholar