Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:10:05.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does Dagan's liberal theory of property provide for compensation at nil compensation in the South African context?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2022

Elmien du Plessis
Elmien du Plessis*
Affiliation:
Professor at North-West University, Potchefstroom, North West, ZA, South Africa
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review Symposium
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , June 2022 , pp. 250 - 258
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Advisory Panel on Land Reform and Agriculture, South Africa (2019) Final Report of the Presidential Advisory Panel on Land Reform and Agriculture.Google Scholar
AgriSA (2019) Agri SA comments on the Draft Expropriation Bill, 2019. Available at: https://www.busa.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Annexure-4-Agri-SA-comments-on-Expropriation-Bill-2019.pdf (accessed 14 January 2022).Google Scholar
Alden, C (1993) From liberation movement to political party: ANC foreign policy in transition. South African Journal of International Affairs 1, 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, T (2010) Liberalism, social democracy and the value of property under the European Convention on Human Rights. International & Comparative Law Quarterly 59, 1055–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badenhorst, P and Malherbe, R (2001) The constitutionality of the Mineral Development Draft Bill 2000 (part 2). Journal of South African Law 4, 765–785.Google Scholar
Cachalia, G (2021) South Africa at a crossroads: a liberal perspective on how to break the mould. Daily Maverick, 17 January. Available at: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2021-01-17-south-africa-at-a-crossroads-a-liberal-perspective-on-how-to-break-the-mould/ (accessed 16 January 2022).Google Scholar
Cardo, M (2012) The liberal tradition in South Africa: past and present. Focus 65, 19.Google Scholar
Dagan, H (2016) Eminent domain and regulatory takings: towards a unified theory. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2861844 (accessed 17 January 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagan, H (2021) A Liberal Theory of Property. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devenish, G (2005) A jurisprudential assessment of the process of constitutional amendment and the basic structure doctrine in South African constitutional law. Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law 68, 243–252.Google Scholar
Du Plessis, E (2020) South Africa has another go at an expropriation law: what it's all about. The Conversation, 1 November. Available at: https://theconversation.com/south-africa-has-another-go-at-an-expropriation-law-what-its-all-about-148379 (accessed 14 January 2022).Google Scholar
Du Plessis, E (2021) The Bill is not perfect, but … Elmien du Plessis responds to Anthea Jeffrey. News24, 12 February. Available at: https://www.news24.com/news24/analysis/expropriation-debate-the-bill-is-not-perfect-but-elmien-du-plessis-responds-to-anthea-jeffrey-20210212 (accessed 14 January 2021).Google Scholar
Du Plessis, E and Lubbe, H (2021) Compensation for expropriation in South Africa, and international law: the leeway and the limits. Constitutional Court Review 11, 79–112.Google Scholar
Epstein, RA (1985) Takings: Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gombert, T et al. (2017) Foundations of Social Democracy. Berlin/Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Henderson, AJH (1997) Cry, the beloved Constitution: constitutional amendment, the vanished imperative of the constitutional principles and the controlling values of section 1. The South African Law Journal 114, 542–555.Google Scholar
Holtham, G (1999) Ownership and social democracy. The Political Quarterly 70, 53–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, A (2021) Bill skewed towards state: Anthea Jeffery responds to Elmien du Plessis. News24, 12 February. Available at: https://www.news24.com/news24/analysis/expropriation-debate-bill-skewed-towards-state-anthea-jeffery-responds-to-elmien-du-plessis-20210212 (accessed 14 January 2022).Google Scholar
Mkentane, L (2021) DA says it will approach apex court if section 25 is amended. BusinessDay, 18 August. Available at: https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/national/2021-08-18-da-says-it-will-approach-apex-court-if-section-25-is-amended/ (accessed 14 January 2022).Google Scholar
Narsiah, S (2002) Neoliberalism and privatisation in South Africa. GeoJournal 57, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, MJ (1988) The liberal conception of property: cross currents in the jurisprudence of takings. Columbia Law Review 88, 1667–1696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, A (2017) Oliver Tambo's Dream: Four Lectures. Cape Town: African Lives.Google Scholar
Van der Sijde, E (2015) Reconsidering the relationship between property and regulation: a systemic constitutional approach. Unpublished LLD thesis, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/97827 (accessed 17 January 2022).Google Scholar
Van der Walt, A (1999) Property rights and hierarchies of power: a critical evaluation of land-reform policy in South Africa. Koers-Bulletin for Christian Scholarship 64, 259–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Walt, AJ (2001) Dancing with codes-protecting, developing and deconstructing property rights in a constitutional state. South African Law Journal 118, 258–311.Google Scholar
Van Staden, M (2020) Property rights and the basic structure of the Constitution: the case of the Draft Constitution Eighteenth Amendment Bill. The Pretoria Student Law Review 14, 169–193.Google Scholar
Van Staden, M and Alberts, T (2021) Fact: the Constitution 18th Amendment Bill must precede the Expropriation Bill. Daily Maverick, 12 October. Available at: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2021-10-12-fact-the-constitution-18th-amendment-bill-must-precede-the-expropriation-bill/ (accessed 17 January 2022).Google Scholar