Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:03:48.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A counter-hegemonic rule of law?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2021

Johanna del Pilar Cortés-Nieto  and
Giedre Jokubauskaite
Johanna del Pilar Cortés-Nieto*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, Universidad del Rosario, Bogotá, Colombia
Giedre Jokubauskaite
Affiliation:
School of Law, University of Glasgow, UK
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

We are sympathetic to the research aims of the two books examined by this symposium and their desire to understand law's role in generating and contesting social injustice. We are also intrigued by the proposal in the Introduction to this symposium, notably to expand the normative reach of the rule-of-law ideal to private actors, in order to transform it into an ally of counter-hegemonic action. In our research, we share a similar research focus (development projects), methodology (case-studies) and concerns (harmful effects of development interventions) with the authors of the two books. Accordingly, in this contribution, we want to think together with the editors of the symposium – by examining the case-study of the Hidroituango project in Colombia (hereinafter, ‘Hidroituango’) – whether the rule of law can indeed be reimagined to limit the arbitrary exercise of power by private actors, and what benefits this might create for dealing with social injustice. However, since neither Bhatt nor Lander advances an explicit account of rule of law in their books, our critique in this piece is addressed not at them, but rather at the theorists and advocates of rule of law as a political ideal.

Type
Reviews Symposium
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 17 , Special Issue 1: Celebration of Peter Fitzpatrick and his Scholarship , March 2021 , pp. 128 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Afanador, J (2018) Poderes fácticos y megaobras de infraestructura. El caso de Hidroituango. Ideas verdes No. 13, Heinrich Böll Stiftung Colombia.Google Scholar
Bhatt, K (2020) Concessionaires, Financiers and Communities: Implementing Indigenous Peoples’ Rights to Land in Transnational Development Projects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomley, N (2020) Precarious territory: property law, housing, and the socio-spatial order. Antipode 52, 36–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheesman, N (2018) Rule-of-law ethnography. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14, 167–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Consorcio Integral (2007) Estudio de impacto ambiental. Hidroeléctrica Pescadero Ituango, Medellín. Available at https://www.epm.com.co/site/Portals/0/documentos/ituango/estudio-de-impacto-ambiental.pdf (accessed 15 August 2020).Google Scholar
Cotula, L (2017) Land, property and sovereignty in international law. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 25, 219–286.Google Scholar
Cutler, AC (2018) The rule of law, new constitutionalism, and transnational legality. In May, C and Winchester, W (eds), Handbook on the Rule of Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escobar, A (2015) Territorios de diferencia: la ontología política de los ‘derechos al territorio’. Cuadernos de Antropología Social 41, 25–38.Google Scholar
Gill, S (2008) Power and Resistance in New World Order, 2nd edn. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Independent Consultation and Investigation Mechanism (MICI) (2018) MICI-CII-CO-2018–0133. Recommendations for a compliance review and terms of reference, revised version. Ituango hydropower plant. Interamerican Development Bank.Google Scholar
Krever, T (2018) The rule of law and the rise of capitalism. In May, C and Winchester, W (eds), Handbook on the Rule of Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krygier, M (2009) The rule of law: legality, teleology, sociology. In Palombella, G and Walker, N (eds), Re-locating the Rule of Law. Oxford: Hart, pp. 45–70.Google Scholar
Krygier, M (2016) The rule of law: pasts, presents and two possible futures. Annual Review of Law and the Social Sciences 12, 199–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krygier, M (2018) Why the rule of law matters. Jurisprudence 9, 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lander, J (2020) Transnational Law and State Transformation: The Case of Extractive Development in Mongolia. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lorde, A (1984) The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. In Lorde, A (ed.), Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Berkeley, CA: Crossing Press, pp. 110–114.Google Scholar
Quong, J (2013) Rights. In Gaus, G and D'Agostino, F (eds), The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 618–628.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, GA (2014) De la consulta previa al consentimiento libre, previo e informado a pueblos indígenas en Colombia. Bogota: Universidad del Rosario, Agencia de Cooperación Alemana y GIZ.Google Scholar
Sokhi-Bulley, B (2016) Governing (through) Rights. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Svampa, M (2019) Neo-extractivism in Latin America: Socio-environmental Conflicts, the Territorial Turn, and New Political Narratives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taekema, S (2019) Two realist idealists theorizing the rule of law. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 11, 301–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wall, IR (2012) Human Rights and Constituent Power: Without Model or Warranty. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar