Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:00:28.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparing legal styles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2019

Catherine Valcke
Catherine Valcke*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Law, University of Toronto
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The question of legal ‘style’ is a central one in comparative law, as mainstream comparative law tends to downplay its importance. The kinds of comparative law scholarship that have attracted most attention in the last decades – the ‘harmonisation projects’ and the ‘legal origins’ literature (perhaps also the ‘legal formant’ literature) – indeed adopt a functionalistic approach to legal systems, whereby only the outcome of judicial decisions (and the factors causally feeding into them) matters – that is, their style does not. This narrow perspective has led to arguments in favour of harmonisation of law worldwide – the thesis according to which law everywhere does and should converge so as to facilitate transnational commerce and globalisation more generally. I propose to argue that legal style matters, as law is about much more than just resolving disputes. Specifically, it is also, and most importantly, a collective statement of identity. To illustrate, I plan on analysing some of the most striking stylistic differences between French and English law, and outline the different such statements emerging from them.

Keywords

contract lawlegal philosophycomparative law
Type
Special Issue Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 15 , Special Issue 3: The Many Faces of ‘Style’ in Law and Legal Scholarship , September 2019 , pp. 274 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, KA (2004/2018) A Manual Style for Contract Drafting, 4th edn. Chicago: ABA Publishing.Google Scholar
Anderson, E and Pildes, R (2000) Expressive theories of law: a general restatement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 5, 1503–1576.Google Scholar
Atiyah, P (1987) Pragmatism and Theory in English Law. London: Stevens.Google Scholar
Barnes, W (2008) The French subjective theory of contract: separating rhetoric from reality. Tulane Law Review 83, 359–394.Google Scholar
Bell, B (2001) French Legal Cultures. London/Edinburgh: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Benson, P (2001) The unity of contract law. In Benson, P (ed.), The Theory of Contract Law: New Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 118–205.Google Scholar
Brand, O (2007) Conceptual comparisons: towards a coherent methodology of comparative legal studies. Brooklyn Journal of International Law 32, 405–466.Google Scholar
Bratman, ME (1999) Faces of Intention: Selected Essays on Intention and Agency. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bridgeman, C (2009) Contracts as plans. University of Illinois Law Review 2009, 341–402.Google Scholar
Brudner, A (with Nadler, JM) (1995/2013) The Unity of the Common Law, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Capitant, H (1923) De la cause des obligations: contrats, engagements unilateraux, legs. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Carlson, K, Livermore, MA and Rockmore, D (2016) Quantitative analysis of writing style on the U.S. Supreme Court (June 25, 2015). Washington University Law Review 93: Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No 3 [online]. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2554516orhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2554516 (accessed 14 August 2018).Google Scholar
Chapman, B (2012) Defeasible rules and interpersonal accountability. In Beltran, JF and Ratti, GB (eds), The Logic of Legal Requirements: Essays on Defeasibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 401–415.Google Scholar
Colin, A and Capitant, H (1914/1924) Cours élémentaire de droit civil français, 4th edn. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Crocker, RL (2011) A History of Musical Style. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Darwall, S (2006) The Second-person Standpoint: Morality, Respect and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
David, R and Pugsley, D (1985) Les Contrats en droit anglaise. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Debruche, A-F et al. (2012) Contract Law in Quebec. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Demolombe, C (1845/1872) Cours de Code Civil XXIV, 5th edn. Paris: Auguste Durand.Google Scholar
Fabre-Magnan, M (1992) De l'obligation d'information dans les contrats: Essai d'une théorie. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Fabre-Magnan, M (2010) Droit des obligations – 1-Contrat et engagement unilateral. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Fairgrieve, D (2016) Comparative Law in Practice: Contract Law in a Mid-channel Jurisdiction. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, EA (1982/2004) Contracts, 4th edn. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Farnsworth, EA (2006) Comparative contract law. In Reimann, M and Zimmerman, R (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 899–935.Google Scholar
Flour, J and Aubert, J-L (1975/1991) Les obligations, 5th edn. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Foucault, M (1966) Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Fried, C (1981) Contract as Promise: A Theory of Contractual Obligation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Friedmann, D (1995) The performance interest in contract damages. Law Quarterly Review 111, 628–654.Google Scholar
Fuller, LL (1941) Consideration and form. Columbia Law Review 41, 799–824.Google Scholar
Garner, BA (1991/2002) The Elements of Legal Style, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gordley, J (ed.) (2001) The Enforceability of Promises in European Contract Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gounot, E (1912) Le principe de l'autonomie de la volonté en droit privé, étude critique de l'individualisme juridique. Paris: A. Rousseau.Google Scholar
Goutal, J-L (1979) Essai sur le principe de l'effet relatif du contrat. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Gray, CB (1981) Patrimony: basis of civilian property law. Cahier de Droit 22, 81–157.Google Scholar
Graziadei, M (2003) The functionalist heritage. In Legrand, P and Munday, R (eds), Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 100–128.Google Scholar
Grenon, A and Bélanger-Hardy, L (eds) (2008) Elements of Quebec Civil Law: A Comparison with the Common Law of Canada. Toronto: Thomson Carswell.Google Scholar
, H., , L. and Mazeaud, J (1956/1962) Leçons de droit civil, Vol. 2, 2nd edn. Paris: Editions Montchrestien.Google Scholar
Harris, D and Tallon, D (eds) (1991) Contract Law Today – Anglo-French Comparisons. Oxford: Clarendon Paperbacks.Google Scholar
Henderson, G (2015) Creating Legal Worlds: Story and Style in a Culture of Argument. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Hoecke, M Van (2004) Deep level comparative law. In Van Hoecke, M (ed.), Epistemology and Methodology of Comparative Law. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart Publishing, pp. 165–196.Google Scholar
Hong Kong Law Journal (2018) Hong Kong Law Journal – Style Guide – Faculty of Law, HKU [online]. Available at https://www.law.hku.hk/hklj/house-style.php (accessed 14 August 2018).Google Scholar
Hopkins, O (2014) Architectural Styles: A Visual Guide. London: Laurence King Publishing.Google Scholar
Husa, J and Smits, JM (2011) A dialogue on comparative functionalism. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 18, 554–558.Google Scholar
Hyland, R (2009) Gifts: A Study in Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, R (1994) Images de la justice. Paris: Léopard d'or.Google Scholar
Kasirer, N (ed.) (2003a) Le droit civil, avant tout un style? Montréal: Thémis.Google Scholar
Kasirer, N (2003b) Portalis now. In Kasirer, N (ed.), Le droit civil, avant tout un style? Montréal: Thémis, pp. 1–46.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H (1967) Pure Theory of Law. Knight, M (trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kessler, A (2005) Our inquisitorial tradition: equity procedure, due process and the search for an alternative to the adversarial. Cornell Law Review 90, 1181–1276.Google Scholar
Kortmann, J (2005) Altruism in Private Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, TS (1962/1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
LaCasse, J (2017) International Baccalaureate: Effectiveness of Transcendental Teaching Styles. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
Lasser, M de SO l’E (2003) The question of understanding. In Legrand, P and Munday, R (eds), Comparative Legal Studies: Traditions and Transitions. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197–239.Google Scholar
Legrand, P (1996) European legal systems are not converging. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 45, 52–81.Google Scholar
Legrand, P (1999a) Fragments on Law-as-culture. Deventer: W E. J Tjeenk Willink.Google Scholar
Legrand, P (1999b) Sur l'analyse différentielle des juriscultures. Revue internationale de droit comparé 51, 1053–1071.Google Scholar
Longhurst, B (1989) Karl Mannheim and the Contemporary Sociology of Knowledge. New York: St Martins Press.Google Scholar
Louis-Lucas, P (1918) Volonté et cause: étude sur le rôle respectif des éléments générateurs du lien obligatoire en droit privé. Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar
Macdonald, RA (1985) Understanding civil law scholarship in Quebec. Osgoode Hall Law Journal 23, 573–608.Google Scholar
Markesinis, BS (1978) Cause and consideration: a study in parallel. Cambridge Law Journal 37, 53–75.Google Scholar
Markovits, D (2004) Contracts as collaboration. Yale Law Journal 113, 1417–1518.Google Scholar
Markovits, D (2006) Making and keeping contracts. Virginia Law Review 92, 1325–1374.Google Scholar
Martinsons, MG (2001) Comparing the Decision Styles of American, Chinese and Japanese Business Leaders. Best Paper Proceedings of Academy of Management Meetings, Washington, DC, August 2001. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=952292 (accessed 30 April 2019).Google Scholar
Marty, G and Raynaud, P (1962) Droit Civil, Vol. 2 (1. Les Obligations). Paris: Sirey.Google Scholar
Matsa, DA and Miller, AR (2012) A female style in corporate leadership? Evidence from quotas. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 13 December. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=1636047 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1636047 (accessed 30 April 2019).Google Scholar
Merryman, JH (1975) Legal education there and here. Stanford Law Review 27, 859–878.Google Scholar
Michaels, R (2006) The functional method of comparative law. In Reimann, M and Zimmermann, R (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 339–382.Google Scholar
Micklitz, H-W (2011) Social Justice and Access Justice in Private Law. January, EUI Working Paper LAW No. 2011/02. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1824225 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1824225 (accessed 23 May 2019).Google Scholar
Moore, T (1993) Principia Ethica. Baldwin, T (ed.). Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholas, B (1982/1992) The French Law of Contract, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nikitina, J (2018) Legal Style Markers and Their Translation: In Written Pleadings Before the European Court of Human Rights. Milan: Edizione Accademiche Italiane.Google Scholar
Office of the Reporter of Decisions Supreme Court of the United States (2016) The Supreme Court's Style Guide. Metzler, J (ed.). Washington, DC: InterAlias.Google Scholar
Perillo, JM (2004–2005) Robert J. Pothier's influence on the common law of contract. Texas Wesleyan Law Review 11, 267–290.Google Scholar
Pollock, F (1950) Pollock's Principles of Contract, 13th edn. London: Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
Posner, RA (2009) Let us never blame a contract breaker. Michigan Law Review 107, 1349–1364.Google Scholar
Postema, G (2014) Law's rule: reflexivity, mutual accountability, and the rule of law. In Zhai, X and Quinn, M (eds), Bentham's Theory of Law and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7–39.Google Scholar
Pothier, RJ (1762/1839) Treatise on the Contract of Sale. Cushing, LS (trans.). Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Ranouil, V (1980) L’autonomie de la volonté, naissance et évolution d'un concept. Paris: PUF.Google Scholar
Rawls, J (1993/2002) The Law of Peoples: with ‘The Idea of Public Reason’ Revisited, 4th edn. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J (1982) Promises in morality and law. Harvard Law Review 95, 916–938.Google Scholar
Ripert, G (1925/1949) La Règle morale dans les obligations civiles, 4th edn. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Ripert, G and Boulanger, J (1956–1959) Traité de droit civil. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Ripstein, A (2009) Force and Freedom – Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Romero, LJ (1986) Specific performance in comparative law: some preliminary observations. Cahiers de Droit 27, 785–811.Google Scholar
Rouhette, G (1991) The obligatory force of contract in french law. In Harris, D and Tallon, D (eds), Contract Law Today – Anglo-French Comparisons. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 38–66.Google Scholar
Roux, J-M (1991) Le rôle créateur de la stipulation pour autrui. Aix-en-Provence: PUAM.Google Scholar
Rowan, S (2012) Remedies for Breach of Contract. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sagarin, E and Kelly, RJ (Fall 1969 to Winter 1970) Karl Mannheim and the sociology of knowledge. Salmagundi 10/11, 292–302.Google Scholar
Samuel, G (1994) The Foundations of Legal Reasoning. Antwerp: Maklu.Google Scholar
Sefton-Green, R (2009) La cause or the length of the french judiciary's foot. In Cartwright, J, Vogenauer, S and Whittaker, S (eds), Comparative Reflections on the Avant-projet de réforme du droit des obligations et de la prescription. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 101–120.Google Scholar
Sefton-Green, R (2011) A vision of social justice in French private law: paternalism and solidarity. In Micklitz, H-W (ed.), The Many Concepts of Social Justice in European Private Law. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 237–256.Google Scholar
Shavell, S (2006–2007) Is breach of contract immoral? Emory Law Journal 56, 439–460.Google Scholar
Sheve, J et al. (2010) Understanding Learning Styles: Making a Difference for Diverse Learners. Huntington Beach, CA: Shell Education Publishing.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, S (2007) The divergence of contract and promises. Harvard Law Review 120, 708–753.Google Scholar
Silbergeld, J (1982) Chinese Painting Style: Media, Methods, and Principles of Form. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Siwecka, S (2011) Genesis and development of the ‘medical fact’: thought style and scientific evidence in the epistemology of Ludwik Fleck. Dialogues in Philosophy, Mental and Neuro Sciences 4, 37–39.Google Scholar
Smith, SA (2004) Contract Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, CR (1996) On the expressive function of law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 144, 2021–2053.Google Scholar
Terré, F, Simler, P and Lequette, Y (1971/1993) Droit civil – Les obligations, 5th edn. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Treitel, G (1989) Remedies for Breach of Contract: A Comparative Account. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tunc, A (1966) The volunteer and the good samaritan. In Ratcliffe, JM (ed.), The Good Samaritan and the Law. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Tunc, A (1974) Pour une motivation plus explicite des décisions de justice, notamment de celles de la Cour de Cassation. Revue trimestrielle de droit civil 72, 487–508.Google Scholar
Tushnet, M (1999) The possibilities of comparative constitutional law. Yale Law Journal 108, 1225–1309.Google Scholar
University of Melbourne, The (2018) Legal Citation Style Guides [online]. Available at https://law.unimelb.edu.au/law-library/research-tools/legal-citation-style-guides (accessed 14 August 2018).Google Scholar
Valcke, C (2009) Contractual interpretation at common law and civil law – an exercise in comparative legal rhetoric. In Neyers, JW, Bronaugh, R and Pitel, SGA (eds), Exploring Contract Law. Oxford/Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Valcke, C (2018) Comparing Law – Comparative Law as Reconstruction of Collective Commitments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vogenauer, S (2009) The effects of contracts on third parties: the Avant-projet de réforme in a comparative perspective. In Cartwright, J, Vogenauer, S and Whittaker, S (eds), Comparative Reflections on the Avant-projet de réforme du droit des obligations et de la prescription. Oxford: Hart Publishing, pp. 235–268.Google Scholar
Waddams, S (2017) The Law of Contracts. 7th edn. Toronto: Canada Law Book.Google Scholar
Waldron, J (2012) The concept and the rule of law. Georgia Law Review 43, 1–62.Google Scholar
Webb, C (2006) Performance and compensation: an analysis of contract damages and contractual obligation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26, 41–71.Google Scholar
Wintgen, R (2004) Étude critique de la notion d'opposabilité: Les effets du contrat à l’égard des tiers en droit français et allemande. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Younger, I (1980) On judicial opinions considered as one of the fine arts. University of Colorado Law Review 51, 341–353.Google Scholar
Zweigert, K and Kötz, H (1977/1998) An Introduction to Comparative Law, 3rd edn. Weir, T (trans.). Amsterdam/New York: North-Holland Pub Co.Google Scholar