Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:54:49.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Backlash against international courts: explaining the forms and patterns of resistance to international courts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2018

Mikael Rask Madsen ,
Pola Cebulak  and
Micha Wiebusch
Mikael Rask Madsen*
Affiliation:
Professor of Law and European Integration, Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, and Director of iCourts, The Danish National Research Foundation's Centre of Excellence for International Courts
Pola Cebulak
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor in European Law, University of Amsterdam and formerly Postdoc at iCourts, University of Copenhagen
Micha Wiebusch
Affiliation:
Researcher (PhD) at SOAS, University of London and IOB, University of Antwerp, and Associate Research Fellow at UNU-CRIS
*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The paper investigates and theorises different forms and patterns of resistance to international courts (ICs) and develops an analytical framework for explaining their variability. In order to make intelligible the resistance that many ICs are currently facing, the paper first unpacks the concept of resistance. It then introduces a key distinction between mere pushback from individual Member States or other actors, seeking to influence the future direction of a court's case-law, and actual backlash – a critique triggering significant institutional reform or even the dismantling of tribunals. On the basis on the proposed theoretical framework, the paper provides a roadmap for empirical studies of resistance to ICs, considering the key contextual factors necessary to take into account in such studies.

Keywords

international courts and tribunalsinstitutional reformauthorityresistanceempirical legal studiesglobalisation
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 14 , Special Issue 2: Resistance to International Courts , June 2018 , pp. 197 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akande, D (2017) ‘ICJ Elections 2017: UN General Assembly and Security Council elect four judges to the ICJ but fail to agree on a fifth, yet again!’, EJIL: Talk!. Available at https://www.ejiltalk.org/icj-elections-2017-un-general-assembly-and-security-council-elect-four-judges-to-the-icj-but-fail-to-agree-on-a-fifth-yet-again-trivia-question/: European Journal of International Law (accessed 28 February 2018).Google Scholar
Aksenova, M and Marchuk, I (2017) Reinventing or rediscovering international law? The Russian Constitutional Court's uneasy dialogue with the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Constitutional Law, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Alter, JK, Helfer, L and Madsen, MR (eds) (2018) The Authority of International Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Alter, K (2001) Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, KJ, Gathii, JT and Helfer, LR (2016 a) Backlash against international courts in West, East and Southern Africa: causes and consequences. European Journal of International Law 27, 293–328.Google Scholar
Alter, KJ, Helfer, LR and Madsen, MR (2016 b) How context shapes the authority of international courts. Law & Contemporary Problems 79, 1–36.Google Scholar
Alter, KJ, Helfer, LR and McAllister, JR (2013) A new international human rights court for West Africa: the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice. American Journal of International Law 107, 737–779.Google Scholar
Appazov, A (2016) Expert Evidence and International Criminal Justice. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Arnardóttir, OM (2017) The Brighton aftermath and the changing role of the European Court of Human Rights. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2, idx002–idx02.Google Scholar
Bengoetxea, J (1993) The Legal Reasoning of the European Court of Justice: Towards a European Jurisprudence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blauberger, M et al. (2018) ECJ judges read the morning papers: explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P (1987) The force of law: toward a sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal 38, 805–853.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P and Wacquant, L (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Burgorgue-Larsen, L (2015) Chronicle of a fashionable theory in Latin America: decoding the doctrinal discourse on conventionality control. In Haeck, Y, Herrera, CB and Chiriboga, OR (eds), The Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Theory and Practice, Present and Future. Ghent: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Çalı, B, Koch, A and Bruch, N (2013) The legitimacy of human rights courts: a grounded interpretivist analysis of the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly 35, 955–984.Google Scholar
Carrubba, CJ, Gabel, M and Hankla, C (2008) Judicial behavior under political constraints: evidence from the European Court of Justice. American Political Science Review 102, 435–452.Google Scholar
Caserta, S (2016) Institutionalizing regional international courts: creation, authority, and power of the Central American and Caribbean Courts of Justice, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Caserta, S (2017) Regional integration through law and international courts – the interplay between De Jure and De Facto supranationality in central America and the Caribbean. Leiden Journal of International Law 30, 579–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caserta, S and Cebulak, P (2018) The limits of international adjudication: authority and resistance of regional economic courts in times of crisis. International Journal for Law in Context 14, 83–101.Google Scholar
Caserta, S and Madsen, MR (2016 a) Between community law and common law: the rise of the Caribbean Court of Justice at the intersection of regional integration and post-colonial legacies. Law & Contemporary Problems 79, 89–116.Google Scholar
Caserta, S and Madsen, MR (2016 b) Consolidating supranational authority: the Caribbean Court of Justice decisions in the Tomlinson cases. American Journal of International Law 110, 533–540.Google Scholar
Castells, M (2000) The Rise of the Network Society: The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Clarke, KM, Knottnerus, AS and De Volder, E (2016) Africa and the ICC. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, J (2018) The current political discourse concerning international law. Modern Law Review 81, 1–22.Google Scholar
Creamer, CD and Godzimirska, Z (2016) (De) legitimation at the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 49, 275.Google Scholar
Daly, T and Wiebusch, M (2018) The African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights: mapping resistance against a young court. International Journal for Law in Context 14, 102–121.Google Scholar
Davies, B (2012) Resisting the European Court of Justice: West Germany's Confrontation with European Law, 1949–1979. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deitelhoff, N and Zimmermann, L (2013) Things We Lost in the Fire: How Different Types of Contestation Affect the Validity of International Norms, PRIF Working Papers 18. Frankfurt am Main: HSFK. Available at http://www.hsfk.de/fileadmin/downloads/PRIF_WP_18.pdf (accessed 1 March 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Y and Madsen, MR (2012) The force of law and lawyers: Pierre Bourdieu and the reflexive sociology of law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 8, 433–452.Google Scholar
Dulitzky, AE (2015) An inter-American constitutional court? The invention of the conventionality. Texas Journal of International Law 50, 45–93.Google Scholar
Durkheim, É (1893) De la division du travail social: étude sur l'organisation des sociétés supérieures. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Dyevre, A (2016) Domestic judicial defiance in the European Union: a systemic threat to the authority of EU law? Yearbook of European Law 35, 106–144.Google Scholar
Elias, N (2000) The Civilizing Process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gathii, JT (2016) Variation in the use of subregional integration courts between business and human rights actors: the case of the East African Court of Justice. Law & Contemporary Problems 79, 37.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, T (2013) Political constraints on international courts. In Romano, CPR, Alter, JK and Shany, Y (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 483–502.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R (2008) The judicialization of mega-politics and the rise of political courts. Annual Review of Political Science 11, 93–118.Google Scholar
Huneeus, A (2011) Courts resisting courts: lessons from the inter-American court's struggle to enforce human rights. Cornell International Law Journal 44, 493.Google Scholar
Huneeus, A and Madsen, MR (2018) Between universalism and regional law and politics: a comparative history of the American, European and African human rights systems. International Journal of Constitutional Law, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Huntington, SP (2005) Who Are We? America's Great Debate. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Karliuk, M (2016) The limits of the judiciary within the eurasian integration process. In di Gregorio, A (ed.), The European Union and the Eurasian Economic Union: Moving toward a Greater Understanding. The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
Katzenstein, S (2014) In the shadow of crisis: the creation of international courts in the twentieth century. Harvard International Law Journal 55, 151–209.Google Scholar
Kauppi, N and Madsen, MR (2013) Transnational power elites: the new professionals of governance, law and security. In Kauppi, N and Madsen, MR (eds), Transnational Power Elites: The New Professionals of Governance, Law and Security. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Kembayev, Z (2016) The Court of the Eurasian Economic Union: an adequate body for facilitating Eurasian integration? Review of Central and East European Law 41, 342–367.Google Scholar
Komárek, J (2012) Czech Constitutional Court playing with matches: the Czech Constitutional Court declares a judgment of the Court of Justice of the EU ultra vires; judgment of 31 January 2012, pl. Ús 5/12, Slovak Pensions XVII. European Constitutional Law Review 8, 323.Google Scholar
Larsson, O and Naurin, D (2016) Judicial independence and political uncertainty: how the risk of override affects the Court of Justice of the EU. International Organization 70, 377–408.Google Scholar
Lipset, SM and Raab, E (1970) The Politics of Unreason: Right Wing Extremism in America, 1790–1970. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Madsen, MR (2011) Legal diplomacy – law, politics and the genesis of postwar European human rights. In Hoffmann, SL (ed.), Human Rights in the Twentieth Century: A Critical History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 62–81.Google Scholar
Madsen, MR (2014) Sociological approaches to international courts. In Alter, K, Romano, CPR and Shany, Y (eds), Oxford University Press Handbook of International Adjudication. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 388–412.Google Scholar
Madsen, MR (2016) The challenging authority of the European Court of Human Rights: from Cold War legal diplomacy to the Brighton Declaration and backlash. Law & Contemporary Problems 79, 141–178.Google Scholar
Madsen, MR (2018 a) Bolstering authority by enhancing communication: how checks and balances and feed-back loops can strengthen the authority of the European Court of Human Rights. In Mendes, J and Venzke, I (eds), Allocating Authority: Who Should Do What in European and International Law? Oxford: Hart, pp. 77–98.Google Scholar
Madsen, MR (2018 b) Rebalancing European human rights: has the Brighton Declaration engendered a new deal on human rights in Europe? Journal of International Dispute Settlement, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Madsen, MR, Olsen, HP and Sadl, U (2017) Competing supremacies and clashing institutional rationalities: the Danish Supreme Court's decision in the AJOS case and the national limits of judicial cooperation. European Law Journal 23 140–150.Google Scholar
Mälksoo, L (2016) Russia's constitutional court defies the European Court of Human Rights. European Constitutional Law Review 12, 377–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, C (2014) The Rule of Law: The Common Sense of Global Politics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Murungu, CB (2011) Towards a criminal chamber in the African Court of Justice and Human Rights. Journal of International Criminal Justice 9, 1067–1088.Google Scholar
Nathan, L (2013) The disbanding of the SADC tribunal: a cautionary tale. Human Rights Quarterly 35, 870–892.Google Scholar
Odermatt, J (2018) Patterns of avoidance: political questions before international courts. International Journal for Law in Context 14, 29–44.Google Scholar
Petersen, RD (2002) Understanding Ethnic Violence: Fear, Hatred, and Resentment in Twentieth-Century Eastern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Posner, EA (2009) The Perils of Global Legalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Provost, R (2015) Teetering on the edge of legal nihilism: Russia and the evolving European human rights regime. Human Rights Quarterly 37, 289–240.Google Scholar
Rothkopf, D (2008) Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They Are Making. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Sandholtz, W, Bei, Y and Caldwell, K (forthcoming, 2018) Backlash and international human rights courts. In Brysk, A and Stohl, M (eds), Contracting Human Rights. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Shaffer, G, Elsig, M and Pollack, M (2017) ‘The Slow Killing of the World Trade Organization’, Huffington Post, 17 November 2017. Available at https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/the-slow-killing-of-the-world-trade-organization_us_5a0ccd1de4b03fe7403f82df (accessed 1 March 2018).Google Scholar
Shaffer, GC, Elsig, M and Puig, S (2016) The extensive (but fragile) authority of the WTO appellate body. Law & Contemporary Problems 19, 237–273.Google Scholar
Skouteris, T (2006) The new tribunalism: strategies of (de)legitimization in the ERA of adjudication. Finnish Yearbook of International Law 17, 307–357.Google Scholar
Soley, X and Steininger, S (2018) Parting ways or lashing back? Withdrawals, backlash and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. International Journal for Law in Context 14, 45–65.Google Scholar
Sweet, AS and Brunell, T (2012) The European Court of Justice, state noncompliance, and the politics of override. American Political Science Review 106, 204–213.Google Scholar
Torelly, M (forthcoming, 2018) From compliance to engagement: assessing the impact of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights on constitutional law in Latina America. In Engstrom, P (ed.), The Inter-American Human Rights System: Impact Beyond Compliance. London: Palgrave Macmilan.Google Scholar
Voeten, E (2010) Borrowing and non-borrowing among international courts. Journal of Legal Studies 39, 547–576.Google Scholar
Waibel, M (2010) The Backlash against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Weber, M (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.Google Scholar