Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:41:11.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Workplace-related rehabilitation after foot fractures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2014

Eckehard Froese*
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation. Social Accident Insurance (VBG), Germany. [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Background: For injured workers facing increased physical requirements the VBG, a German Social Accident Insurance Institution, provides 2 types of outpatient medical treatment for the last phase of rehabilitation. One option is a functionally orientated extended physiotherapy including the opportunity for work-ability testing at the workplace with a gradual increase of workload and working time. Second option is a newly-developed multidisciplinary workplace-related rehabilitation integrating the specific work-relevant functional flows in therapy under the direction of a qualified physician and therapists in rehab facilities.

Objective: To evaluate the effects of workplace-related rehabilitation after foot fractures in outpatient rehab facilities. Methods: Data of all completed cases with severe fractures of the calcaneus or the ankle joint, undergoing workplace-related therapy in 2013 (n = 27), were compared to consecutive data of 27 completed cases undergoing extended physiotherapy.

Findings: Mean age in both groups was 48 years. In the extended physiotherapy group 14 patients additionally received a work-ability testing directly at the workplace. Mean duration from accident to capacity for work was 169.81 days (SD 60.4) for extended physiotherapy and 176.81 days (SD 49.3) for workplace-related rehabilitation. 23 patients with extended physiotherapy and 26 patients with workplace-related rehabilitation maintained work ability 3 months after achieving full capacity for work. Subsequent rehab measures after regaining capacity for work were needed in 6 cases in the extended physiotherapy group and in one case in the workplace-related rehabilitation group.

Discussion: Though no statistically verifiable difference in duration of incapacity for work between both groups was found, the results provide apparently evidence that multidisciplinary workplace-related rehabilitation is more sustainable. It is suggested, that a systematic approach and individually tailored multidisciplinary training of the specific work-relevant movement patterns under constant medical and therapeutic direction lead to more stable rehabilitation results.

Conclusion: Further research is needed to consolidate our empirical findings.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2014