Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T01:00:26.738Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thinking in terms of law and mortality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 February 2005

K Greenawalt
Affiliation:
Columbia University School of Law, 435 West 116th Street, New York, NY 10027, USA

Extract

The author lays a blueprint for distinctions between legal and moral rules and socially accepted behavior, situations in which these distinctions set different standards of conduct, and the relationship among them. Several of the more common paradigms of cultural property disputes are then fit into the patterns of legal and moral rules and obligations, thus establishing a framework for the discussion of how to evaluate ethical or moral behaviors in varying circumstances. The author also considers the relevance of deontological and consequentialist arguments for the return of cultural property, as well as avoidance strategies by which a country of origin can make a claim for restitution while ignoring the long-term questions of the legitimacy, power, and responsibilities of national governments. The author concludes by emphasizing the difficulties in basing arguments concerning cultural property on moral evaluations and conclusions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The International Cultural Property Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)