We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Review of David A. Scott, Art: Authenticity, Restoration and Forgery. 500 pp. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, 2016
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
03 October 2017
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Brandi, Cesare, and Basile, Giuseppe. 2005. Theory of Restoration. Rome: Instituto Centrale per il Restauro.Google Scholar
De Clerq, Rafael. 2013. “The Metaphysics of Restoration.”British Journal of Aesthetics53, no. 3: 261–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, Denis. 2003. “Authenticity in Art.” In The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics, edited by Levinson, Jerrold, 258–74. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson. 1968. Languages of Art: An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Bobb-Merrill.Google Scholar
Rowe, Mark. 2013. “The Problem of Perfect Fakes.” In Philosophy and the Arts, edited by O’Hear, Anthony, 151–75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sagoff, Mark. 1978. “On Restoring and Reproducing Art.”Journal of Philosophy75, no. 9: 453–70.Google Scholar
Scott, David A. 2015. “Conservation and Authenticity: Interactions and Enquiries.”Studies in Conservation60, no. 5: 291–305.Google Scholar
Scott, David A. 2016. Art: Authenticity, Restoration and Forgery.Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar