Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:17:32.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fifty Years of Collecting: The Sale of Ancient Maya Antiquities at Sotheby’s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2017

Cara Grace Tremain
Cara Grace Tremain*
Affiliation:
PhD candidate, Department of Anthropology and Archaeology, University of Calgary; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Pre-Columbian antiquities, particularly those from the Maya region, are highly sought after on the international art market. Large auction houses such as Sotheby’s have dedicated pre-Columbian departments and annual auctions, for which sales catalogues are created. These catalogues offer insight into market trends and allow the volume of antiquities being bought and sold to be monitored. The following study records the public sale of Maya antiquities at Sotheby’s over a period slightly exceeding 50 years from 1963 to 2016. More than 3,500 artifacts were offered for sale during this period, of which more than 80 percent did not have associated provenance information. The data suggests that the volume of Maya antiquities offered for sale at Sotheby’s public auctions have been steadily decreasing since the 1980s, but their relative value has increased. Quantitative studies of auction sales such as this one can be useful in monitoring the market for illegal antiquities and forgeries.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , May 2017 , pp. 187 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agovino, Theresa. 2014. “Christie’s Latest Bid to Compete.” Crain’s New York Business 30, no. 44: 29.Google Scholar
Ashenfelter, Orley, and Graddy, Kathryn. 2005. “Anatomy of the Rise and Fall of a Price-Fixing Conspiracy: Auctions at Sotheby’s and Christie’s.” Journal of Competition Law and Economics 1, no. 1: 3–20.Google Scholar
Batres, Leopoldo. 1910. Antigüedades Mejicanas Falsificadas: Falsificacion y Falsificadores (Fake Mexican Antiquities: Forgery and Forgers). Mexico City: Fidencio S. Soria.Google Scholar
Bellingham, David. 2008. “Ethics and the Art Market.” In The Art Business, edited by Robertson, Iain and Chong, Derrick, 176–96. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, Elizabeth Hill. 1982. Falsifications and Misreconstructions of Pre-Columbian Art: A Conference at Dumbarton Oaks, October 14th and 15th, 1978. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks, Trustees for Harvard University.Google Scholar
Brodie, Neil. 2006. “An Archaeologist’s View of the Trade in Unprovenanced Antiquities.” In Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy, and Practice, edited by Hoffman, Barbara T., 52–63. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brodie, Neil. 2014a. “Auction Houses and the Antiquities Trade.” In Third International Conference of Experts on the Return of Cultural Property, edited by Choulia-Kapeloni, S., 63–73. Athens: Archaeological Receipts Fund.Google Scholar
Brodie, Neil. 2014b. “Provenance and Price: Autoregulation of the Antiquities Market?” European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 20, no. 4: 427–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, Neil. 2015. “The Internet Market in Antiquities.” In Countering Illicit Traffic in Cultural Goods: The Global Challenge of Protecting the World’s Heritage, edited by France, Desmarais, 11–20. Paris: International Council of Museums.Google Scholar
Bruhns, Karen O. 2000. “www.plunderedpast.com.” Society of American Archaeology Bulletin 18, no. 2: 14–17.Google Scholar
Chippindale, Christopher, and Gill, David W. J.. 2000. “Material Consequences of Contemporary Classical Collecting.” American Journal of Archaeology 104, no. 3: 463–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chippindale, Christopher, Gill, David, Salter, Emily, and Hamilton, Christian. 2001. “Collecting the Classical World: First Steps in a Quantitative History.” International Journal of Cultural Property 10, no. 1: 1–31.Google Scholar
Cioni, Enrico. 2014. “From John Hewett to John Stokes: How Robert and Lisa Sainsbury Assembled Their Collection of Pre-Columbian Art.” Unpublished MA thesis, University of East Anglia.Google Scholar
Coggins, Clemency. 1969. “Illicit Traffic of Pre-Columbian Antiquities.” Art Journal 29, no. 1: 94–114.Google Scholar
Coggins, Clemency. 1998. “United States Cultural Property Legislation: Observation of a Combatant.” International Journal of Cultural Property 7, no. 1: 52–68.Google Scholar
Coggins, Clemency Chase, and Shane, Orrin C. III, eds. 1984. Cenote of Sacrifice: Maya Treasures from the Sacred Well at Chichén Itza. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Colt, Charles C. Jr., ed. 1980. The Official Sotheby Parke Bernet Price Guide to Antiques and Decorative Arts. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Corson, Christopher. 1973. “Iconographic Survey of Some Principal Figurine Subjects from the Mortuary Complex of Jaina, Campeche.” In Studies in Ancient Mesoamerica, edited by John, Graham, 51–75. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Daniels, Brian, Renninger, Sasha, and Leventhal, Richard. 2014. “Evaluating the Impact of Archaeological Context on the Antiquities Market: A Case Study.” Paper presented at the Society for American Archaeology 79th Annual Meeting, Austin, 26 April.Google Scholar
Davis, Tess. 2011. “Supply and Demand: Exposing the Illicit Trade in Cambodian Antiquities through a Study of Sotheby’s Auction House.” Crime, Law, and Social Change 56, no. 2: 155–74.Google Scholar
Ede, James. 1998. “Ethics, the Antiquities Trade, and Archaeology.” International Journal of Cultural Property 7, no. 1: 128–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekholm, Gordon F. 1964. “The Problem of Fakes in Pre-Columbian Art.” Curator: The Museum Journal 7, no. 1: 19–32.Google Scholar
Elia, Ricardo J. 2001. “Analysis of the Looting, Selling, and Collecting of Apulian Red-figure Vases: A Quantitative Approach.” In Trade in Illicit Antiquities: The Destruction of the World’s Archaeological Heritage, edited by Brodie, Neil, Doole, Jennifer, and Renfrew, Colin, 145–53. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Fay, Emily. 2011. “Virtual Artifacts: eBay, Antiquities, and Authenticity.” Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 27, no. 4: 449–64.Google Scholar
Gerstenblith, Patty. 2006. “Recent United States Legal Developments in the Protection of the Archaeological Heritage.” In Archaeology, Cultural Heritage, and the Antiquities Trade, edited by Brodie, Neil, Kersel, Morag M., Luke, Christina, and Tubb, Kathryn Walker, 68–92. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Gerstenblith, Patty. 2007. “Controlling the International Market in Antiquities: Reducing the Harm, Preserving the Past.” Chicago Journal of International Law 8, no. 1: 167–95.Google Scholar
Gerstenblith, Patty. 2013. “The Meaning of 1970 for the Acquisition of Archaeological Objects.” Journal of Field Archaeology 38, no. 4: 364–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilgan, Elizabeth. 2001. “Looting and the Market for Maya Objects: A Belizean Perspective.” In Trade in Illicit Antiquities: The Destruction of the World’s Archaeological Heritage, edited by Brodie, Neil, Doole, Jennifer, and Renfrew, Colin, 73–87. Cambridge: McDonald Institute Monographs.Google Scholar
Gill, David W. J., and Chippindale, Christopher. 1993. “Material and Intellectual Consequences of Esteem for Cycladic Figures.” American Journal of Archaeology 97: 601–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Gillett G. 1986. “In Defense of the Collector.” National Geographic 169, no. 4: 462–65.Google Scholar
Healy, Paul F., and Blainey, Marc G.. 2011. “Ancient Maya Mosaic Mirrors: Function, Symbolism, and Meaning.” Ancient Mesoamerica 22, no. 2: 229–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Christian. 2012. Dynamics of Auction: Social Interaction and the Sale of Fine Art and Antiques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Herrmann, Frank. 1981. Sotheby’s: Portrait of an Auction House. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Barbara T. 2006. “International Art Transactions and the Resolution of Art and Cultural Property Disputes: A United States Perspective.” In Art and Cultural Heritage: Law, Policy, and Practice, edited by Hoffman, Barbara T., 159–77. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kelker, Nancy L., and Bruhns, Karen O.. 2010. Faking Ancient Mesoamerica. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, Justin. 1989. The Maya Vase Book, Volume 1: A Corpus of Rollout Photographs of Maya Vases. New York: Kerr Associates.Google Scholar
Kersel, Morag M. 2006. “From the Ground to the Buyer: A Market Analysis of the Trade in Illicit Antiquities.” In Archaeology, Cultural Heritage, and the Antiquities Trade, edited by Brodie, Neil, Kersel, Morag M., Luke, Christina, and Tubb, Kathryn Walker, 188–205. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Levine, Marc N., and de Luna, Lucha Martínez. 2013. “Museum Salvage: A Case Study of Mesoamerican Artifacts in Museum Collections and on the Antiquities Market.” Journal of Field Archaeology 38, no. 3: 264–76.Google Scholar
Lobay, Gordon Brock. 2006. “Objects and Objectivity: An Archaeology of Auctions. Central Italian Antiquities at Bonhams, Christie’s and Sotheby’s 1970–2005.” Unpublished PhD diss., Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lobay, Gordon Brock. 2009. “Border Controls in Market Countries as Disincentives to Antiquities Looting at Source? The US-Italy Bilateral Agreement 2001.” In Criminology and Archaeology: Studies in Looted Antiquities, edited by Mackenzie, Simon and Green, Penny, 59–80. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Luke, Christina, and Henderson, John S.. 2006. “The Plunder of the Ulúa Valley, Honduras, and a Market Analysis for Its Antiquities.” In Archaeology, Cultural Heritage, and the Antiquities Trade, edited by Brodie, Neil, Kersel, Morag M., Luke, Christina, and Tubb, Kathryn Walker, 147–72. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, Simon. 2011. “Trafficking Antiquities.” In International Crime and Justice, edited by Natarajan, Mangai, 141–47. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Museo Nacional de Antropología. 2011. 100 Obras: Catálogo Esencial Museo Nacional de Antropología. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia.Google Scholar
Nørskov, Vinnie. 2002a. Greek Vases in New Contexts: The Collecting and Trading of Greek Vases – An Aspect of the Modern Reception of Antiquity. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
Nørskov, Vinnie. 2002b. “Greek Vases for Sale: Some Statistical Evidence.” In Illicit Antiquities: The Theft of Culture and the Extinction of Archaeology, edited by Brodie, Neil and Walker-Tubb, Kathryn, 23–37. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, Eva A. 2014. “From Auction to Gallery: Sotheby’s Private Sales Development.” MA thesis, Sotheby’s Institute of Art.Google Scholar
Reents-Budet, Dorie. 1994. Painting the Maya Universe: Royal Ceramics of the Classic Period. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1993. “Collectors Are the Real Looters.” Archaeology 46, no. 3: 16–17.Google Scholar
Savage, George. 1976. Forgeries, Fakes and Reproductions: A Handbook for Collectors. London: White Lion Publishers.Google Scholar
Scott, David A. 2013. “Modern Antiquities: The Looted and the Faked.” International Journal of Cultural Property 20, no. 1: 49–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sokal, Marina Papa. 2006. “The US Legal Response to the Protection of the World Cultural Heritage.” In Archaeology, Cultural Heritage, and the Antiquities Trade, edited by Brodie, Neil, Kersel, Morag M., Luke, Christina, and Tubb, Kathryn Walker, 36–67. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.Google Scholar
Stanish, Charles. 2009. “Forging Ahead.” Archaeology 62, no. 3: 18–66.Google Scholar
Tate, Carolyn. 1985. “The Carved Ceramics Called Chocholá.” In Fifth Palenque Round Table, 1983, edited by Roberton, Merle Greene and Fields, Virginia M., 123–33. San Francisco: Pre-Columbian Art Research Institute.Google Scholar
Washburn, Wilcomb E. 1987. “Increasing our Knowledge of Pre-Columbian Civilizations by Not Collecting Pre-Columbian Objects.” In Pre-Columbian Collections in European Museums, edited by Hocquenghem, Anne-Marie, Tamási, Peter, and Villain-Gandossi, Christiane, 28–35. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Watson, Peter. 1997. Sotheby’s: Inside Story. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Willey, Gordon R. 1972. The Artifacts of Altar de Sacrificios. Cambridge: Peabody Museum.Google Scholar
Yates, Donna. 2006. “South America on the Block: The Changing Face of Pre-Columbian Antiquities Auctions in Response to International Law.” Unpublished MA thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Yates, Donna. 2015. “Value and Doubt: The Persuasive Power of ‘Authenticity’ in the Antiquities Market.” PARSE 2: 71–84.Google Scholar
Yates, Donna. 2016. “Museums, Collectors, and Value Manipulation: Tax Fraud through Donation of Antiquities.” Journal of Financial Crime 23, no. 1: 173–86.Google Scholar