Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T20:34:40.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epilogue: Anxieties About Culture and Tradition—Property as Reification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 December 2009

Mark Busse
Affiliation:
University of Auckland. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

The articles in this special issue on intellectual property in the Pacific document anxieties about culture and tradition, and about the intrusion of ideas of property into previously uncommodified areas of peoples' lives. These include fears that traditional knowledge and skills are not being passed on to young people (Nason and Peter; Pigliasco); that migrants in a globalized world will take aspects of culture with them when they leave (Nason and Peter); that anthropologists and other scholars will wrongfully appropriate and use aspects of the cultures they study for their own benefit (Van Meijl); and that profits from the commercialization of traditional knowledge, practices, and products will not go to the people who consider themselves their owners and caretakers (Lindstrom). In addition, Jo Recht's contribution provides a discussion of attempts to protect culture and tradition through international conventions and national laws. Finally, Andrew Moutu and Michael Goldsmith describe claims of ownership over aspects of nature to reflect on fundamental aspects of intellectual property and ownership more generally.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, Lila. “Writing against Culture.” In Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, edited by Fox, Richard G., 137–62. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Boyle, James. “Fencing off Ideas: Enclosure and the Disappearance of the Public Domain.” Daedalus 131, no. 2 (2002): 1325.Google Scholar
Brumann, Christoph. “Writing for Culture: Why a Successful Concept Should Not Be Discarded.” Current Anthropology 40 (Supplement 1999): S1S27.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael. “Can Culture Be Copyrighted?Current Anthropology 39, no. 2 (1998): 193222.Google Scholar
Busse, Mark. “Museums and the Things in Them Should Be Alive.” International Journal of Cultural Property 15 (2008):189200.Google Scholar
Busse, Mark, and Whimp, Kathy. “Introduction.” In Protection of Intellectual, Cultural, and Biological Property in Papua New Guinea, edited by Whimp, Kathy and Busse, Mark, 128. Canberra, Sydney: Asia Pacific Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Kristen A., Katyal, Sonia K., and Riley, Angela R.. “In Defense of Property.” The Yale Law Journal 118 (2009):1022–25.Google Scholar
Clifford, James. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Collins German Dictionary. London: Collins, 2007.Google Scholar
Facey, Ellen. “Kastom and Nation Making: The Politicization of Tradition on Nguna, Vanuatu.” In Nation Making: Emergent Identities in Postcolonial Melanesia, edited by Foster, Robert J., 207–26. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Filer, Colin. “Local Custom and the Art of Land Group Boundary Maintenance in Papua New Guinea.” In Customary Land Tenure and Registration in Australia and Papua New Guinea: Anthropological Perspectives, edited by Weiner, James F. and Glaskin, Katie, 135–74. Canberra, Sydney: ANU E Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Foster, Robert J.The Commercial Construction of ‘New Nations.’Journal of Material Culture 4, no. 3 (1999): 263–82.Google Scholar
Foster, Robert J.Materializing the Nation: Commodities, Consumption, and Media in Papua New Guinea. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Foster, Robert J. “Print Advertisement and Nation Making in Metropolitan Papua New Guinea.” In Nation Making: Emergent Identities in Postcolonial Melanesia, edited by Foster, Robert J., 151–81. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Godelier, Maurice. The Enigma of the Gift. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Gregory, Chris. Gifts and Commodities. London: Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Grillo, Roy. “Cultural Essentialism and Cultural Anxiety.” Anthropological Theory 3, no. 2 (2003): 157–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, Ian. “Between Michel Foucault and Erving Goffman: Between Discourse in the Abstract and Face-to-Face Interaction.” Economy and Society 33, no. 3 (2004): 277302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirsch, Eric, and Strathern, Marilyn, eds. Transactions and Creations: Property Debates and the Stimulus of Melanesia. New York: Berghahn Books, 2004.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric, and Ranger, Terence, eds. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. “Reification and Recognition: A New Look at an Old Idea.” In Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea, edited by Jay, Martin, 1794. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. Verdinglichung: Eine anerkennungstheoretische Studie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2005.Google Scholar
Jameson, Frederic. Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso, 1990.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. “Introduction.” In Reification: A New Look at an Old Idea, edited by Jay, Martin, 313. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Jolly, Margaret. “Kastom as Commodity: The Land Dive as Indigenous Rite and Tourist Spectacle in Vanuatu.” In Culture, Kastom, Tradition: Developing Cultural Policy in Melanesia, edited by Lindstrom, Lamont and White, Geoffrey M., 131–44. Suva, Fiji: Institute of Pacific Studies, University of the South Pacific, 1994.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, Dan. “Clan-finding, Clan-making and the Politics of Identity in a Papua New Guinea Mining Project.” In Customary Land Tenure and Registration in Australia and Papua New Guinea: Anthropological Perspectives, edited by Weiner, James F. and Glaskin, Katie, 5772. Canberra, Sydney: ANU E Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Kalinoe, Lawrence, and Leach, James, eds. Rationales of Ownership: Transactions and Claims to Ownership in Contemporary Papua New Guinea. Wantage: Sean Kingston, 2004.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L., and Kluckhohn, Clyde. Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions. Cambridge: Peabody Museum, 1952.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, Lamont. “Discourse.” In Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology, edited by Barnard, Alan and Spencer, Jonathan, 162–63. London: Routledge, 1996.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, Lamont, and White, Geoffrey M.. “Cultural Policy: An introduction.” In Culture, Kastom, Tradition: Developing Cultural Policy in Melanesia, edited by Lindstrom, Lamont and White, Geoffrey M., 118. Suva, Fiji: Institute of Pacific Studies, University of the South Pacific, 1992.Google Scholar
Lukács, György. History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics. Translated by Livingstone, Rodney. London: Merlin Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ernest. Late Capitalism. London: Verso, 1978.Google Scholar
Marcus, George, and Fischer, Michael M.J., eds. Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1. Translated by Fowkes, Ben. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990.Google Scholar
Petrović, Gajo. “Reification.” In A Dictionary of Marxist Thought, edited by Bottomore, Tom, 411–13. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1983.Google Scholar
Pinney, Christopher. “Things Happen, or, From Which Moment Does That Object Come?” In Materiality, edited by Miller, Daniel, 256–72. Durham: Duke University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. “Property and Personhood.” Stanford Law Review 34, no. 5 (1982): 9571015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. “Reflections on Objectification.” Southern California Law Review 65 (1991): 341–54.Google Scholar
Pacific Community, Secretariat of the. Cultural Affairs Programme: Strategic Plan 2006–2009. Noumea: Secretariat of the Pacific Community, 2005.Google Scholar
Simet, Jacob L. “Tolai Concepts of Culture.” In Culture, Kastom, Tradition: Developing Cultural Policy in Melanesia, edited by Lindstrom, Lamont and White, Geoffrey M., 5566. Suva, Fiji: Institute of Pacific Studies, University of the South Pacific, 1994.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. The Gender of the Gift: Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. “The Nice Thing about Culture is That Everyone Has It.” In Shifting Contexts: Transformations in Anthropological Knowledge, edited by Strathern, Marilyn, 153–76. London: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. Property, Substance and Effect: Anthropological Essays on Persons and Things. London: Athlone Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. “Qualified Value: The Perspective of Gift Exchange.” In Barter, Exchange and Value: An Anthropological Approach, edited by Humphrey, Caroline and Hugh-Jones, Stephen, 169–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, Karen. “Interrogating Individuals: The Theory of Possessive Individualism in the Western Pacific.” Anthropological Forum 17, no. 3 (2007): 213–24.Google Scholar
Wagner, Roy. The Invention of Culture. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1975.Google Scholar
Weiner, Annette B.Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While-Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Weiner, James F. “The Foi Incorporated Land Group: Group Definition and Collective Action in the Kutubu Oil Project Area, Papua New Guinea.” In Customary Land Tenure and Registration in Australia and Papua New Guinea: Anthropological Perspectives, edited by Weiner, James F. and Glaskin, Katie, 117–34. Canberra, Sydney: ANU E Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society. London: Fontana, 1976.Google Scholar