Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:18:23.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reflecting Absence, or How Ground Zero Was Purged of Its Material History (2001–2010)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 April 2015

Bob van Toor
Affiliation:
Cultural Studies Department, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Email: [email protected], [email protected]
Hanneke Ronnes
Affiliation:
Cultural Studies Department, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Email: [email protected], [email protected]

Abstract:

The development of the urban space of Ground Zero has been a long and difficult process, resulting in the removal of almost all of its material history. The material objects formerly present on the site had an important part and significant agency in the struggle between different stakeholders of Ground Zero. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey and Larry Silverstein, owner and leaseholder of the sixteen acres that held the Twin Towers, intended to rebuild the ten million square feet of office space that was destroyed on 9/11. This force of production asserted itself over possible modes of consumption of the space, each championed and represented by overlapping groups of people. Some wished to see the space redeveloped as a site of mourning, others as a site fit for touristic consumption, as a space for residence, or as a site representing a material past older than 9/11. It shall be argued that for these consumer groups the symbolic complexity of the site, and its potential power in political performances, was intricately connected to space and the material agency of objects remaining on Ground Zero post 2001.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Alexander, Jeffrey. 2004. “From the Depths of Despair: Performance and Counterperformance on September 11th.” Sociological Theory 22, no. 1: 88105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw. 1962. How to Do Things with Words? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beauregard, Robert A. 2008. “Making an Inclusive Urbanism: New York City’s World Trade Memorial.” In A City of One’s Own, Blurring the Boundaries Between Private and Public, edited by Body-Gendrot, Sophie, Carré, Jacques, and Garbaye, Romain, 2540. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Beauregard, Robert A. 2004. “Mistakes Were Made: Rebuilding the World Trade Center, Phase 1.” International Planning Studies 9, no. 2-3: 139–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blair, Carole. 1999. “Contemporary U.S. Memorial Sites as Exemplars of Rhetoric’s Materiality.” In Rhetorical Bodies, edited by Selzer, Jack and Crowley, Sharon, 4453. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Blais, Allison, and Rasic, Lynn, eds. 2011. A Place of Remembrance: Official Book of the National September 11 Memorial. Washington, DC: National Geographic.Google Scholar
Cantwell, Anne-Marie, and Wall, Diana diZerega. 2001. Unearthing Gotham: The Archaeology of New York City. New York: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Casey, Edward. 1997. The Fate of Place. California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chhabra, Deepak, Healy, Robert, and Sills, Erin. 2003. “Staged Authenticity and Heritage Tourism.” Annals of Tourism Research 30, no. 3: 702–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darton, Eric. 1999 [ed. 2011]. Divided We Stand: A Biography of the World Trade Center. New York: Lightning Source Inc.Google Scholar
Doig, Jameson W. 2001. Empire on the Hudson: Entrepreneurial Vision and Political Power at the Port of New York Authority. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Doss, Erika. 2012. Memorial Mania: Public Feeling in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Garvin, Alexander. 1996. The American City: What Works, What Doesn’t. New York: McGraw Hill Professional.Google Scholar
Glanz, James, and Lipton, Eric. 2004. City in the Sky: The Rise and Fall of the World Trade Center. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
Goldberger, Paul. 2004. Up from Zero: Politics, Architecture and the Rebuilding of New York. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Greenspan, Elizabeth L. 2003. “Spontaneous Memorials, Museums, and Public History: Memorialization of September 11, 2001 at the Pentagon.” The Public Historian 25, no. 2: 129–32.Google Scholar
Greenspan, Elizabeth L. 2013. Battle for Ground Zero. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hajer, Maarten. 2005. “Rebuilding Ground Zero. The Politics of Performance.” Planning Theory and Practice 6, no. 4: 445–64.Google Scholar
Haney, C. Allen, Leimer, Christina, and Lowery, Juliann. 1997. “Spontaneous Memorialization: Violent Death and Emerging Mourning Ritual.” Omega 35, no. 2: 159–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtorf, Cornelius J. 1997. “Megaliths, Monumentality and Memory.” Archaeological Review from Cambridge 14, no. 2: 4566.Google Scholar
Jacobs, Jane. 1964. The Life and Death of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Jivén, G, and Larkham, P.J.. 2003. “Sense of Place, Authenticity and Character: A Commentary.” Journal of Urban Design 8, no. 1: 6781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchhoff, Michael David. 2007. “Material Agency: A Theoretical Framework for Ascribing Agency to Material Culture.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 13, no. 3, http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/SPT/v13n3/kirchoff.html.Google Scholar
Kirchhoff, Michael David. 1998. Destination Culture: Tourism, Museums, and Heritage. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, Barbara. 2003. “Kodak Moments, Flashbulb Memories: Reflections on 9/11.” The Drama Review 47, no. 1: 1118.Google Scholar
Knappett, Carl, and Malafouris, Lambros, eds. 2010. Material Agency: Towards a Non- Anthropocentric Approach. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Kopytoff, Igor. 1986. “The Cultural Biography of Things: Commoditization as Process.” In The Social Life of Things: Commodities in Cultural Perspective, edited by Appadurai, Arjun, 6491. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Langewiesche, William. 2003. American Ground: Unbuilding the World Trade Center. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The Production of Space. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lisle, Debbie. 2004. “Gazing at Ground Zero: Tourism, Voyeurism and Spectacle.” Journal for Cultural Research 8, no. 1: 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mosco, Vincent. 2007. “The Empire at Ground Zero.” In Urban Communication: Production, Text, Context, edited by Gibson, Timothy A. and Lowes, Mark, 199216. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Peckham, Robert Shannan, ed. 2003. Rethinking Heritage: Cultures and Politics in Europe. London: I.B.Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Miles. 2001. “The Gift of Presence: The Act of Leaving Artifacts at Shrines, Memorials, and Other Tragedies.” In Textures of Place: Exploring Humanist Geographies, edited by Adams, Paul C., Hoelscher, Steven, and Till, Karen E., 257–72. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Sack, Robert D. 1993. “The Power of Place and Space.” Geographical Review 83, no. 3: 326–29.Google Scholar
Sanderson, Eric, ed. 2009. The Mannahatta Project: A Natural History of New York City. New York: Abrams.Google Scholar
Santino, Jack, ed. 2006. Spontaneous Shrines and the Public Memorialization of Death. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senie, Harriet. 2006. “Mourning in Protest: Spontaneous Memorials and the Sacralization of Public Space.” In Spontaneous Shrines and the Public Memorialization of Death, edited by Santino, Jack, 4156. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 2002 [1903]. “The Metropolis and Mental Life.” In The Blackwell City Reader, edited by Bridge, Gary and Watson, Sophie, 1119. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shafernich, Sandra M. 1993. “On-Site Museums, Open-Air Museums, Museum Villages and Living History Museums: Reconstructions and Period Rooms in the United States and the United Kingdom.” Museum Management and Curatorship 12, no. 1: 4361.Google Scholar
Soja, Edward W. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Solecki, Ralph S. 1974. “The ‘Tiger,’ an Early Dutch 17th Century Ship, and an Abortive Salvage Attempt.” Journal of Field Archaeology 1, no. 1/2: 110–16.Google Scholar
Stone, Philip R. 2006. “A Dark Tourism Spectrum: Towards a Typology of Death and Macabre Related Tourist Sites, Attractions and Exhibitions.” TOURISM: An Interdisciplinary International Journal 54, no. 2: 145–60.Google Scholar
Sturken, Marita. 2004. “The Aesthetics of Absence: Rebuilding Ground Zero.” American Ethnologist 31, no. 3: 311–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturken, Marita. 2007. Tourists of History: Memory, Kitsch, and Consumerism from Oklahoma City to Ground Zero. New York: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Urry, John. 1995. Consuming Places. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Violi, P. 2012. “Trauma Site Museums and Politics of Memory: Tuol Sleng, Villa Grimaldi and the Bologna Ustica Museum.” Theory, Culture & Society 29, no. 1: 3675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace, Mike. 2002. A New Deal for New York. New York: Bell & Weiland Publishers.Google Scholar
Wirth, Louis. 1938. “Urbanism as a Way of Life.” The American Journal of Sociology 44, no. 1: 124.Google Scholar
Zuber, Devin. 2006. “Flânerie at Ground Zero: Aesthetic Countermemories in Lower Manhattan.” American Quarterly 58, no. 2: 269–99.Google Scholar