Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T05:21:20.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Politics of Repatriation: Formalizing Indigenous Repatriation Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2018

Ashleigh Breske
Ashleigh Breske*
Affiliation:
Hollins University, Roanoke, VA, United States; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This article will show how institutions and cultural values mediate changes in the governance of repatriation policy. By examining ownership paradigms and institutional power structures and analyzing the changing discourses before and after the passage of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, it is possible to understand the ramifications of formalizing repatriation. The current binary of cultural property nationalism/cultural property internationalism in relation to Indigenous ownership claims does not represent the full scope of the conflict for Indigenous people within the Western legal interpretations of property ownership. Inclusion of a cultural property indigenism component into the established cultural property nationalism/internationalism ownership paradigm will more accurately represent Indigenous concerns for cultural property. Looking at the rules, norms, and strategies of national and international laws and museum institutions, this article will argue that there are consequences to repatriation claims that go beyond the possession of property and that a formalized process (or semi-formalized approach) can aid in addressing Indigenous rights.

Keywords

Indigenous rightsrepatriationcultural property indigenismNAGPRAownership claimssettler colonialism
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , August 2018 , pp. 347 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Anderson, Benedict. 1983. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Champagne, Duane. 2013. “United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Human, Civil, and Indigenous Rights. Presidential Address, Thirteenth Annual Conference of the American Indian Studies Association, February 2012.” Wicazo Sa Review 28, no. 1: 9–22.Google Scholar
Conaty, Gerald T. (ed). 2015. We are Coming Home, Repatriation and the Restoration of Blackfoot Cultural Confidence . Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Jens. 2012. The Indigenous Space and Marginalized Peoples in the United Nations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs. 2009. International Repatriation Program. http://www.fahcsia.gov/au/sa/indigenous/progserv/repatriation/Pages/default.aspx (accessed 20 October 2017).Google Scholar
Duncan, Carol, and Wallach, Allan. 1980. “The Universal Survey Museum.” Art History 3, no. 4: 448–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Charlotte. 2008. The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine-Dare, Kathleen S. 2002. Grave Injustice: The American Indian Repatriation Movement and NAGPRA . Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Force, Roland W. 1999. Politics and the Museum of the American Indian: The Heye and the Mighty. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Gulliford, Andrew. 2000. Sacred Objects and Sacred Places, Preserving Tribal Traditions. Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
Grande, Lance. 2017. Curators: Behind the Scenes of Natural History Museums . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grinde, Donald A. Jr. 2004. “Taking the Indian Out of the Indian, U.S. Policies of Ethnocide through Education.” Wicazo Sa Review 19, no. 2: 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Sarah K. 1997. “Justifying Repatriation of Native American Cultural Property.” Chicago-Kent College of Law at Illinois Institute of Technology 72: 723–74.Google Scholar
Hooper-Greenhill, Eilean. 2000. Museums and the Interpretation of Visual Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Tiffany. 2016. Keeping Their Marbles: How the Treasures of the Past Ended Up in Museums—And Why They Should Stay There . Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kreps, Christina. 2003. “Curatorship as Social Practice.” Curator: The Museum Journal 46: 311–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuprecht, Karolina. 2012. “The Concept of “Cultural Affiliation” in NAGPRA: Its Potential and Limits in the Global Protection of Indigenous Cultural Property Rights.” International Journal of Cultural Property 19: 33–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuprecht, Karolina. 2014. Indigenous Peoples’ Cultural Property Claims: Repatriation and Beyond. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomawaima, K. Tsianina. 1993. “Domesticity in the Federal Indian Schools: The Power of Authority over Mind and Body.” American Ethnologist 20, no. 2: 227–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luke, Timothy W. 2002. Museum Politics: Power Plays at the Exhibition . Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Robert H. 2002. “Rights, Remains, and Material Culture: Legal Pluralism in Native America.” In Truth Claims: Representation and Human Rights, edited by Bradley, Mark Philip and Petro, Patrice, 205–228. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. 1986. “Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property.” American Journal of Comparative Law 80, no. 4: 831–53.Google Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. 1990. ““Protection” of the Cultural “Heritage”?” American Journal of Comparative Law 38: 513–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merryman, John Henry. 2005. “Cultural Property Internationalism.” International Journal of Cultural Property 12: 11–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Museum of New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa. 2017. “The Karanga Aotearoa Repatriation Programme.” Te Papa Release. https://www.tepapa.govt.nz/about/repatriation/karanga-aotearoa-repatriation-programme (accessed 7 September 2018).Google Scholar
Mussleman, Jenna. 2005. “Ninth Circuit Limits NAGPRA to Remains Linked with Presently Existing Tribes.” Ecology Law Quarterly 32, no. 3: 707–13.Google Scholar
Neller, Angela, Peters, Ramona, and Obermeyer, Brice. 2013. “NAGPRA’s Impact on Non-Federally Recognized Tribes.” In Accomplishing NAGPRA: Perspectives of the Intent, Impact, and Future of the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, edited by Chari, Sangita and Lavallee, Jaime M. N., 161–194. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.Google Scholar
Niezen, Ronald. 2003. The Origins of Indigenism: Human Rights and the Politics of Identity. Oakland: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pickering, Michael, and Gordon, Phil. 2011. “Repatriation: The End of the Beginning.” In Understanding Museums: Australian Museums and Museology, edited by Griffin, Des and Paroissien, Leon. Acton: National Museum of Australia. Published online at http://nma.gov.au/research/understanding-museums/MPickering_PGordon_2011.html (accessed 8 September 2018).Google Scholar
Prott, Lyndel V. 2005. “The International Movement of Cultural Objects.” International Journal of Cultural Property 12: 225–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prott, Lyndel V., and O’Keefe, Patrick. 1989. Law and the Cultural Heritage, vol. 3. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Preucel, Robert W. 2011. “An Archaeology of NAGPRA: Conversations with Suzan Show Harjo.” Journal of Social Archaeology 11, no. 2: 130–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulitano, Elvira. 2012. Indigenous Rights in the Age of the UN Declaration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redman, Samuel J. 2016. Bone Rooms: From Scientific Racism to Human Prehistory in Museums. Cambridge, MA, and London, England: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandholtz, Wayne. 2007. Prohibiting Plunder: How Norms Change . Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies . London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Smithsonian Institution. 2004. Uniquely American: 2004 Annual Report. https://www.si.edu/Content/Pdf/About/2004-Smithsonian-Annual-Report.pdf (accessed 7 September 2018).Google Scholar
Stocking, George W. Jr. 1992. The Ethnographer’s Magic and Other Essays in the History of Anthropology. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Truscott, Marilyn. 2006. “Repatriation of Indigenous Cultural Property.” Paper prepared for the 2006 Australian State of the Environment Committee, Department of the Environment and Heritage, Canberra. http://155.187.2.69/soe/2006/publications/emerging/repatriation/pubs/repatriation.pdf (accessed 9 September 2018).Google Scholar
Veracini, Lorenzo. 2010. Settler Colonialism: A Theoretical Overview. Chippenham, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrdoljak, Ana Filipa. 2006. International Law, Museums and the Return of Cultural Objects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watkins, Joe. 2005. “Cultural Nationalists, Internationalists, and ‘Intra-nationalists’: Who’s Right and Whose Right?” International Journal of Cultural Property 12: 78–94.Google Scholar
Watkins, Joe. 2013. “The Politics of Archaeology: Heritage, Ownership, and Repatriation.” In La Follette, Laetitia, Negotiating Culture: Heritage, Ownership, and Intellectual Property . Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Patrick. 1999. Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politic and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event . London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Young, Janet. 2010. “Responsive Repatriation: Human Remains Management at a Canadian National Museum.” Anthropology News 51, no. 3: 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar