Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:25:35.678Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Entextualization of Ayurveda as Intellectual Property

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2012

Matthew Wolfgram
Matthew Wolfgram*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of Alabama. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article documents the practices of pharmaceutical creativity in Ayurveda, focusing in particular on how practitioners appropriate multiple sources to innovate medical knowledge. Drawing on research in linguistic anthropology on the social circulation of discourse—a process called entextualization—I describe how the ways in which Ayurveda practitioners innovate medical knowledge confounds the dichotomous logic of intellectual property (IP) rights discourse, which opposes traditional collective knowledge and modern individual innovation. While it is clear that these categories do not comprehend the complex nature of creativity in Ayurveda, I also use the concept of entextualization to describe how recent historical shifts in the circulation of discourse have caused a partial entailment of this opposition between the individual and the collectivity. Ultimately, I argue that the method exemplified in this article of tracking the social circulation of medical discourse highlights both the empirical complexity of so-called traditional creativity, and the politics of imposing the categories of IP rights discourse upon that creativity, situated as it often is, at the margins of the global economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 19 , Special Issue 3: Intangible Property at the Periphery: Expanding Enclosure in the 21st Century , August 2012 , pp. 313 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alter, Joseph S., ed. Asian Medicine and Globalization. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Jane. Law, Knowledge Culture: The Production of Indigenous Knowledge in Intellectual Property Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aragon, Lorraine V. “Copyrighting Culture for the Nation? Intangible Property Nationalism and the Regional Arts of Indonesia.” International Journal of Cultural Property (2012, this issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M.The Dialogic Imagination. Translated by Emerson, C. and Holquist, M.. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Banerjee, Madhulika. “Power, Culture and Medicine: Ayurvedic Pharmaceuticals in the Modern Market.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 36 (2002): 435–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Don, ed. Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, Richard, and Briggs, Charles L.. “Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life.” Annual Review of Anthropology 19 (1990): 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bode, Maarten. “Taking Traditional Knowledge to the Market: The Commoditization of Indian Medicine.” Anthropology and Medicine 13, no. 3 (2006): 225–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, James. Shamans, Software, and Spleens: Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyle, James. “The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66 (2003): 33–75.Google Scholar
Cohen, Lawrence. “The Epistemological Carnival: Meditations on Disciplinary Intentionality and Ayurveda.” In Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions, edited by Bates, Don, 320–43. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coombe, Rosemary. The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation and the Law. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. The Division of Labor in Society. Translated by Coser, Lewis A.. New York: Free Press, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekbal, B. “Preface.” In Van Rheede's Hortus Malabaricus, English Edition, with Annotations and Modern Botanical Nomenclature. 12 vols. Translated by Manilal, K.. Trivandrum, Kerala: University of Kerala Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Geismar, Haidy. Treasured Possessions, Cultured Resources: Intellectual and Cultural Property and Indigenous Rights in the Pacific. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. “Footing.” Semiotica 25 (1979): 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliburton, Murphy. “Resistance or Inaction? Protecting Ayurvedic Medical Knowledge and Problems of Agency.” American Ethnologist 38, no. 1 (2011): 86–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallowell, Alfred Irving. “The Nature and Functions of Property as a Social Institution.” Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1 (1943): 115–38.Google Scholar
Holton, Gerald. Thematic Origins of Scientific Thought: Kepler to Einstein. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith. “When Talk Isn't Cheap: Language and Political Economy.” American Ethnologist 16, no. 2 (1989): 248–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaggi, O. P.History of Science and Technology in India: Yogic and Tantric Medicine. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Kroeber, Alfred L. “The Superorganic.” American Anthropologist 19 (1917): 163–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, Joel. “‘Medical Discourse’ in Anthropological Context: Views of Language and Power.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 3, no. 2 (1989): 99–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuññurāman Vaidyan, K. D.Cikilsa Anubhavaṅṅaḷ [Clinical experiences]. Kerala, Thiruvananthapuram: R. V. Publishers, 1999.Google Scholar
Langford, Jean M.Fluent Bodies: Ayurvedic Remedies for Postcolonial Imbalance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno, and Woolgar, Steve. Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1979.Google Scholar
Leslie, Charles. “The Ambiguities of Medical Revivalism in Modern India.” In Asian Medical Systems: A Comparative Study, edited by Leslie, Charles, 355–67. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, Charles. “Interpretations of Illness: Syncretism in Modern Ayurveda.” In Paths to Asian Medical Knowledge, edited by Leslie, Charles and Young, Allan, 177–208. Berkeley and London: University of California Press, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, Bronislaw. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1984. First published 1922.Google Scholar
Manilal, K. S., trans. Van Rheede's Hortus Malabaricus, English Edition, with Annotations and Modern Botanical Nomenclature. 12 vols.Trivandrum, Kerala: University of Kerala Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Translated by Fowkes, Ben. New York: Vintage Books, 1977.Google Scholar
Merton, Robert. “The Matthew Effect in Science, II.” Isis 79 (1988): 606–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naraindas, Harish. “Of Spineless Babies and Folic Acid: Evidence and Efficacy in Biomedicine and Ayurvedic Medicine.” Social Science & Medicine 62, no. 11 (2006): 2658–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nēśamaṇi, S.Auṣadha Sasyaṅṅaḷ [Medicinal plants]. Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala: State Institute of Languages, 2001. First published 1985.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, Carolyn R. “Exploring Pluralism–the Many Faces of Ayurveda.” Social Science and Medicine 27, no. 5 (1988): 479–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obeyesekere, Gananath. “Science, Experimentation, and Clinical Practice.” In Paths to Asian Medical Knowledge, edited by Leslie, Charles and Young, Allan, 160–76. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Pickstone, John V.Ways of Knowing: A New History of Science, Technology, and Medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Pollock, Sheldon. “The Theory of Practice and the Practice of Theory in Indian Intellectual History.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 105, no. 3 (1985): 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. “The Meaning of ‘Meaning.’” In Mind, Language and Reality, 215–71. Cambridge, UK: University Press, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, Sita. “Making Heritage Legible: Who Owns Traditional Medical Knowledge?” International Journal of Cultural Property 13 (2006): 161–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Mark. Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. “Do We Need a Superorganic?” American Anthropologist 19 (1915): 441–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiva, Vandana. Biopiracy: The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael, and Urban, Greg, eds. Natural Histories of Discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Śrīmān Nambūtiri, D., ed. Cikitsamañjari (Collection of treatments). 6th ed. Kerala, Alappuzha: Vaidyarambham, 2003. First published 1990.Google Scholar
Sunder, Madhavi. “The Invention of Traditional Knowledge.” Law and Contemporary Problems 70 (2007): 97–124.Google Scholar
Tabor, Daniel C. “Ripe and Unripe: Concepts of Health and Sickness in Ayurvedic Medicine.” Social Science and Medicine B 15 (1981): 439–55.Google ScholarPubMed
Trawick, Margaret. “The Ayurvedic Physician as Scientist.” Social Science and Medicine 24, no. 12 (1987): 1031–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
United Nations. Convention on Biological Diversity, 1992.Google Scholar
United Nations. Convention on Biological Diversity. Convention on Biological Diversity: Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Text and Annex, 2011.Google Scholar
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Convention for the Safeguarding the Intangible Cultural Heritage. Paris: UNESCO, 2003.Google Scholar
Voloshinov, V.Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. Translated by Matejka, Ladislav and Titunik, I. R.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S.Thought and Language. Translated by Kozulin, A.. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Weiss, Richard S. “Divorcing Ayurveda: Siddha Medicine and the Quest for Uniqueness.” In Modern and Global Ayurveda: Pluralism and Paradigms, edited by Wujastyk, Dagmar and Smith, Frederick M., 77–100. New York: State University of New York Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Weiss, Richard S.Recipes for Immortality: Medicine, Religion, and Community in South India. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Raymond. Marxism and Literature. London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Wolfgram, M. S. “Ayurveda in the Age of Biomedicine: Discursive Asymmetries and Counter-Strategies.” PhD diss., University of Michigan, 2009.Google Scholar
Wolfgram, M. S. “Truth Claims and Disputes in Ayurveda Medical Science.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20, no. 1 (2010): 149–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). The Protection of Traditional Knowledge: Draft Articles. Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore Nineteenth Session, 2011.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization. Overview: The TRIPS Agreement. www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/intel2_e.htm (accessed October 1, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wujastyk, Dagmar, and Smith, Frederick M., eds. Modern and Global Ayurveda: Pluralism and Paradigms. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Wujastyk, Dominik. The Roots of Ayurveda. New Delhi: Penguin Books, 1998.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Francis. “The Scholar, the Wise Man, and Universals: Three Aspects of Ayurvedic Medicine.” In Knowledge and the Scholarly Medical Traditions, edited by Bates, Don, 227–319. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Francis. The Jungle and the Aroma of Meats. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Francis. “Gentle Purge: The Flower Power of Ayurveda.” In Paths to Asian Medical Knowledge, edited by Leslie, Charles and Young, Allan, 209–23. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1992.Google Scholar