Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T05:51:39.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Culture, Property, and Peoplehood: A Comment on Carpenter, Katyal, and Riley's “In Defense of Property”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2010

Michael F. Brown
Michael F. Brown
Affiliation:
Williams College. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

First, the good news: Carpenter, Katyal, and Riley make a compelling case that the venerable concept of property—long defined primarily by such principles as transferability and rights of exclusion and control—should be broadened to encompass a robust ideal of stewardship. In doing so, “In Defense of Property” (henceforth, IDP) renders property more compatible with the indigenous view of things. This significant contribution to ongoing global debates about the protection of indigenous heritage will be of great interest to readers of the IJCP.

Type
“IN DEFENSE OF PROPERTY”: AN EXCHANGE
Information
International Journal of Cultural Property , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , August 2010 , pp. 569 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Asmah, Josephine. “Historical Threads: Intellectual Property Protection of Traditional Designs: The Ghanaian Experience and African Perspectives.” International Journal of Cultural Property 15 (2008): 271–96.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F.Who Owns Native Culture? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F. “Heritage Trouble: Recent Work on the Protection of Intangible Cultural Property.” International Journal of Cultural Property 12 (2005): 40–61.Google Scholar
Brown, Michael F. “Sovereignty's Betrayals.” In Indigenous Experience Today, edited by de la Cadena, Marisol and Starn, Orin, 171–95. Oxford: Berg, 2007.Google Scholar
Busse, Mark. “Epilogue: Anxieties about Culture and Tradition—Property as Reification.” International Journal of Cultural Property 16 (2009): 357–70.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Kristen A., Katyal, Sonia K., and Riley, Angela R.. “In Defense of Property.” Yale Law Journal 118 (2009): 1022–125.Google Scholar
Clifford, James. “Varieties of Indigenous Experience: Diasporas, Homelands, Sovereignties.” In Indigenous Experience Today, edited by de la Cadena, Marisol and Starn, Orin, 197–225. Oxford: Berg, 2007.Google Scholar
Comaroff, John L., and Comaroff, Jean. Ethnicity, Inc. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowen, Tyler. Creative Destruction: How Globalization Is Changing the World's Cultures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eagleton, Terry. The Idea of Culture. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000.Google Scholar
Fox, Richard G., and King, Barbara J., eds. Anthropology Beyond Culture. Oxford: Berg, 2002.Google Scholar
Hapiuk, William J. Jr. “Of Kitsch and Kachinas: A Critical Analysis of the ‘Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990’.” Stanford Law Review 53 (2001): 1009–75.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Translated and edited by Gregor, Mary. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
M'Closkey, Kathy. Swept Under the Rug: A Hidden History of Navajo Weaving. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Mezey, Naomi. “The Paradoxes of Cultural Property.” Columbia Law Review 107 (2007): 2004–46.Google Scholar
Mullin, Molly H.Culture in the Marketplace: Gender, Art, and Value in the American Southwest. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Posner, Eric A. “The International Protection of Cultural Property: Some Skeptical Observations.” Chicago Journal of International Law 8 (2007): 213–31.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. Reinterpreting Property. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Sax, Joseph L.Playing Darts with a Rembrandt: Public and Private Rights in Cultural Treasures. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woltz, Jennie D. “The Economics of Cultural Misrepresentation: How Should the Indian Arts and Crafts Act of 1990 be Marketed?” Fordham Intellectual Property, Media, and Entertainment Law Journal 17, no. 2 (2007): 443–500.Google Scholar