Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:20:37.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

About Sacred Cultural Property: The Hopi Masks Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2014

Marie Cornu*
Affiliation:
Director of research at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), Director of the CECOJI. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Case Note
Copyright
Copyright © International Cultural Property Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agostini, E. Commentary on the decision of the Court of Appeal of Paris, 20 December 1976. Revue Dalloz, 1978, pp. 373379.Google Scholar
Bandrac, M. “Vérification de la capacité d’ester en justice.” In Droit et pratique de la procédure civile, edited by Guinchard, no. 103.12. Paris: Dalloz, 2011.Google Scholar
Bandrac, . “Vérification de la qualité à agir.” In Droit et pratique de la procédure civile, edited by Guinchard, , no. 102160. Paris: Dalloz, 2011.Google Scholar
Center for Studies on International Legal Cooperation (CECOJI). Les modèles propriétaires. University of Poitiers, France: Lexis-Nexis, 2012.Google Scholar
Center for Studies on International Legal Cooperation (CECOJI). Study on Preventing and Fighting Illicit Trafficking in Cultural Goods in the EU. 2012. http://ec.europa.eu/culture/our-policy-development/cultural-heritage/illicit-traffic_en.htm (accessed 15 August 2013).Google Scholar
Cornu, M. Protection de la propriété culturelle et circulation des biens culturels—Étude de droit comparé Europe/Asie (Chine, Royaume Uni, France, Suisse). 2010. http://www.gip-recherche-justice.fr/spip.php?article298 (accessed 15 August 2013).Google Scholar
Denolle, A. La propriété des objets archéologiques, étude de droit comparé France et Etats Unis, Thesis, University of Paris Sud, 2013.Google Scholar
Directive 93/7/EEC of 15 March 1993 on the Return of Cultural Objects Unlawfully Removed from the Territory of a Member State. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31993L0007:en:HTML (accessed 15 August 2013).Google Scholar
Duchesne, V. and Simode, F. “Pérou, Mexique...Terres identitaires,” L’Oeil, no. 657, May 2013, p. 47.Google Scholar
Labbée, X. “La valeur des choses sacrée ou le prix des restes mortels,” Dalloz, no. 14, 2005, pp. 930–934.Google Scholar
Lacabarats, A. “Compétence des juges des référés.” In Droit et pratique de la procédure civile, no. 125.181. France: Dalloz, 2011.Google Scholar
Monier, R. Vocabulaire de droit romain. Pario: Montchrestien, Domat, 1949.Google Scholar
Noumea Accord. “Preamble.” 5 May 1998. http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/AILR/2002/17.html (accessed 15 August 2013).Google Scholar
O’Keefe, P. J. “The Repatriation of Sacred Objects.” In Witnesses to History: A Compendium of Documents and Writings on the Return of Cultural Objects, edited by Prott, L. V., pp. 225238. New York: United Nations Educational, 2009.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, S. Droit de la nature et des gens. Lyon, France: Leyde, 1771.Google Scholar
Revet, T., and Zénati-Castaing, F.. Les biens, 3rd ed. Paris: PUF, 2008.Google Scholar
ICOM Code of Ethics, 2004.Google Scholar
UNESCO. Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property 14 November 1970. http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13039&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (accessed 15 August 2013).Google Scholar
UNIDROIT. Convention on Stolen or Illegally Exported Cultural Objects. Rome, 24 June 1995. http://www.unidroit.org/english/conventions/1995culturalproperty/main.htm (accessed 15 August 2013).Google Scholar
Vivier, J.-L. Commentary on the decision of the Court of Appeal of Noumea, 9 April 1987. La Semaine juridique, Ed. G, no. 45, 1987, 20880.Google Scholar