Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:03:51.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Temporal dispersion of the emergence of intelligence: an inter-arrival time analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Thomas W. Hair
Thomas W. Hair
Affiliation:
College of Arts and Sciences, Florida Gulf Coast University, 10501 FGCU Blvd, South, Fort Myers, FL 33965, USA e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many reasons for why extraterrestrial intelligences might avoid communications with our civilization have been proposed. One possible scenario is that all civilizations follow the lead of some particularly distinguished civilization. This paper will examine the impact the first successful civilization could have on all other subsequent civilizations within its sphere of influence and the ramifications of this as it relates to the Fermi Paradox. Monte Carlo simulation is used to map the inter-arrival times of early civilizations and to highlight the immense epochs of time that the earliest civilizations could have had the Galaxy to themselves.

Keywords

astrobiologyextra-terrestrial intelligencefermi paradoxMonte CarloSETIzoo hypothesis
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Astrobiology , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 131 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, F.C. & Laughlin, G. (1997). Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, J.A. (1973). Icarus 19, 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bracewell, R. (1982). Pre-emption of the Galaxy by the First Advanced Civilization, Pergmon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Bracewell, R. (1974). The Galactic Club: Intelligent Life in Outer Space, W.H. Freeman and Co., New York.Google Scholar
Clark, J.A. (2002). Gaining Ground: The Origin and Evolution of Tetrapods, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Crawford, I.A. (2000). Sci. Am. July, 38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, P. (2010). The Eerie Silence. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forgan, D. (2009). Int. J. Astrobiol. 8, 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forgan, D. & Rice, K. (2010). Int. J. Astrobiol. 9, 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freitas, R. (1980). J. Br. Interplanet. Soc. 33, 251.Google Scholar
Hart, M. (1975). Q. J. R. Astron. Soc. 16, 128.Google Scholar
Kardashev, N.S. (1964). Sov. Astron. 8, 217.Google Scholar
Lanzetta, K. et al. (2002). Astrophysics 570, 492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lineweaver, C.H. (2001). Icarus 151, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lineweaver, C.H., Fenner, Y. & Gibson, B. (2004). Science 303, 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, E. (2003). The Diffusion of Innovation, 5th edn.Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
Samland, M. & Gerhard, O.E. (2002). Astron. Astrophys. 399, 961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soter, S. (2005). Astrobiol. Mag. 17 Oct (Retrieved from:www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=1745>).).>Google Scholar
Snyder, D.L. & Miller, M.I. (1991). Random Point Processes in Time and Space. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, P. & Brownlee, D. (2000). Rare Earth: Why Complex Life is Uncommon in the Universe. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar