Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:14:49.558Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Habitable worlds of merging stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2020

Ivan I. Shevchenko*
Affiliation:
Saint Petersburg State University, 7/9 Universitetskaya nab., 199034Saint Petersburg, Russia
*
Author for correspondence: Ivan I. Shevchenko, E-mail: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is shown that W UMa-type and SX Phe-type stellar populations are both perfectly and uniquely suited for maintaining hyper-effective biopolymer chain reactions (BCR) on their planets once the planet is in the stellar habitable zone. W UMa-type stars are known to be contact binaries, and SX Phe-type stars are presumably post-binaries, i.e., products of stellar mergers. In case of the contact binaries, the eclipse-driven periodic heating/cooling of planetary surfaces has period-amplitude parameters that perfectly satisfy stringent conditions for maintaining BCR-like reactions. In case of the post-binaries, the stars pulsate with periods and amplitudes also perfectly suited for maintaining the reactions. Therefore, the ‘W UMa – SX Phe’ metamorphosis (from a contact binary to a post-binary, via the merger) seems to provide a potential biosystem reboot on planets in these systems.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

1. Introduction

Our Sun is on the half-way of its main-sequence evolution: its age is about 4.5 Gyr, and about 5 Gyr is left until it leaves the main sequence and becomes a red giant; see, e.g., Ribas (Reference Ribas, Kosovichev, Andrei and Rozelot2010). This transformation will have catastrophic consequences for the Solar system inner zone, where the terrestrial planets reside. Indeed, the atmosphere of the red giant will partly engulf it, possibly up to the Earth's orbit. What is more, the Sun's luminosity will rise hundreds of times, thus destroying even those planets that will not be engulfed by the Solar atmosphereFootnote 1. However, there exists a chance that, when this catastrophic epoch arrives, the inner rocky-planet zone (including the ‘habitable’ annular band) will be already cleared from any planets. First of all, this concerns the fate of Mercury: it may escape the first (Laskar Reference Laskar1994). Laskar and Gastineau (Reference Laskar and Gastineau2009) showed that not only Mercury may escape, but there exist future possible orbits of Venus, Earth and Mars with mutual encounters. In other words, the entire inner Solar system may disintegrate, in a few Gigayears from now. The chaotic disintegration of the Solar system was studied and explained, in a semi-analytical way, in Batygin et al. (Reference Batygin, Morbidelli and Holman2015). A similar-kind inner disintegration can be typical for many single-star planetary systems, in which giant planets are peripheral with respect to inner terrestrial planets, as in our Solar system.

Circumbinary planetsFootnote 2 of main-sequence stars have certain habitability advantages over single Solar-like stars (Shevchenko Reference Shevchenko2017). What is more, an escape of potentially habitable planets can also be provided in circumbinary systems in due time (Shevchenko Reference Shevchenko2018), before the central stellar binary evolves up to some violent stage, say, the binary merger.

In this article, we show that there may exist a much more efficient mechanism, specific uniquely for circumbinary systems, which seems to allow for life survival on potentially habitable circumbinary planets during the host stellar binary merger stage.Footnote 3 It may provide both a pre-merger conservation and a post-merger revival of the evolved bioinformation on the planets. Note that mergers of companions in evolving main-sequence stellar binaries are quite a usual phenomenon; according to Hwang and Zakamska (Reference Hwang and Zakamska2020), more than 90% of the old-population short-period binaries most likely disappear due to the mergers during their main-sequence stage.

2. Ubiquity of circumbinary planets

In the currently available sample of two dozens of the observed stellar binaries hosting circumbinary planets, about a half have periods less than several hours, and about a half have periods that are greater than 5 d (see, e.g., exoplanet.eu). There is a dearth of CBP-hosting binaries with intermediate periods. Indeed, according to (Slawson et al. Reference Slawson, Prša, Welsh, Orosz, Rucker, Batalha, Doyle, Engle, Conroy, Coughlin, Gregg, Fetherolf, Short, Windmiller, Fabrycky, Howell, Jenkins, Uddin, Mullally, Seader, Thompson, Sanderfer, Borucki and Koch2011, fig. 8), in a sample of two thousands of eclipsing binaries in the Kepler data, more than a thousand have periods less than 7 d, but practically none are known to possess planets.

A number of observational biases are active, but the actual dearth of CBP-hosting binaries with $P \lesssim 5\, {\rm d}$ seems to be statistically significant (Armstrong et al. Reference Armstrong, Osborn, Brown, Faedi, Gómez Maqueo Chew, Martin, Pollacco and Udry2014; Martin and Triaud Reference Martin and Triaud2014). Fleming et al. (Reference Fleming, Barnes, Graham, Luger and Quinn2018) explained the dearth by eventual entrance of CBPs in the circumbinary chaotic zone, in the course of the long-term planet-binary co-evolution. In the tidal scenario of Fleming et al. (Reference Fleming, Barnes, Graham, Luger and Quinn2018), the circumbinary chaotic zone slowly broadens (because the binary's orbit increases in size, due to the tidal transfer of the angular momentum from the stellar rotation), while the planetary orbit size stays constant. This mechanism of entrance in the chaotic zone is different from that proposed in Shevchenko (Reference Shevchenko2018), where the planetary orbit tidally decays in size, while the chaotic zone size stays constant.

It should be underlined that (1) the observed dearth concerns Neptune-like and Jupiter-like giant planets; observational statistics on terrestrial CBPs, whose sizes are much smaller, is lacking, because such small planets are simply hard to discover; (2) the dearth has an intermediate character: as already mentioned above, CBPs of very close (with periods less than several hours) binaries do exist, although these hosting binaries typically contain evolved stars.

Generally, the close Solar-type binaries with periods less than 10 d are believed to be a product of some long-term dissipative evolution, most likely a tidal friction, which is triggered in hierarchical triples by the Lidov–Kozai oscillations (Armstrong et al. Reference Armstrong, Osborn, Brown, Faedi, Gómez Maqueo Chew, Martin, Pollacco and Udry2014; Martin et al. Reference Martin, Mazeh and Fabrycky2015; Muñoz and Lai Reference Muñoz and Lai2015; Hamers et al. Reference Hamers, Perets and Portegies Zwart2016). On the other hand, the existing correlation between companions’ masses and the resemblance between the close-binary fractions for the pre-main-sequence stars and for the main-sequence field stars show that the evolution to the close state is fast, taking $\lesssim 5\, {\rm Myr}$, most likely due to the dissipation in primordial gas (Moe and Kratter Reference Moe and Kratter2018). Therefore, the potential existence of CBP-hosting main-sequence pre-merger stellar binaries is quite plausible; in any case, it is not ruled out.

3. Biopolymer chain reactions

3.1. Polymerase chain reactions

In the authentic polymerase chain reaction (PCR), a periodic cycling between low and high temperatures, with an amplitude of ~ 50°, drives exponential amplification of concentration of DNA molecules: at a low temperature, association is promoted and complementary strands are synthesized (the molecules number doubles), whereas at a high temperature the duplex strands dissociate; when temperature is again decreased, the molecules number again doubles, and the continued cycling amplifies the molecules number in a geometrical progression (Mullis et al. Reference Mullis, Faloona, Scharf, Saiki, Horn and Erlich1986). The PCR is used in laboratories for copying and inflating the volume of DNA material for genetic-study and forensic purposes; see Mullis et al. (Reference Mullis, Faloona, Scharf, Saiki, Horn and Erlich1986); Lathe (Reference Lathe2005) for more details and references.

3.2. Tidal chain reactions

Repeatedly drying–wetting tidal pools are thought to be a possible place of origin of self-replicating biopolymers, as such pools provide favourable conditions for concentrating organic molecules; see Lathe (Reference Lathe2004) and references therein. In Lathe (Reference Lathe2004, Reference Lathe2005, Reference Lathe2006, Reference Lathe and Seckbach2012), a theory of abiogenesis was proposed, based on a tidal ‘boosting’ effect for the biomolecules production in such near-shore lakes and ponds. The mechanism is analogous to that represented by the PCR, but, in Lathe's tidal chain reaction (TCR), the water salinity, not temperature, is periodically driven, leading to the same, as in the PCR, exponential amplification of nucleic acids (Lathe Reference Lathe2004, Reference Lathe2005). The association is promoted and complementary strands are synthesized at high salinity, and at low salinity the duplex strands dissociate. What is more, the cyclic changes in salinity may drive periodic breakage and reassembly of micelles, as precursors to cellular life (Lathe Reference Lathe and Seckbach2012).

A problem with the biopolymer chain reactions is that the reaction product is unstable and decays quite rapidly, as discussed in detail in Lathe (Reference Lathe2005) in connection with the TCR abiogenesis scenario for the early Earth affected by the Lunar tides (Lathe Reference Lathe2004, Reference Lathe2005). However, nucleic acids (DNA in particular) in aqueous solutions at high temperatures (~ 100°C) and elevated salt concentrations demonstrate marked stability, low levels of nucleotide thermodegradation and chain scission (Marguet and Forterre Reference Marguet and Forterre1994, Reference Marguet and Forterre2001).

3.3. Relevance to CBPs

One may ask: do there exist ‘natural laboratories’ anywhere in the Universe, where any PCR-like or TCR-like reactions can be naturally maintained? And how they are ubiquitous? In case of the TCR, the early Earth, subject to Lunar tides, was proposed in Lathe (Reference Lathe2004, Reference Lathe2005) as such a natural laboratory. In this article, we argue that PCR-like reactions can be naturally maintained on planets in habitable zones (HZs) of contact-binary and post-binary main-sequence stars.

As shown in Shevchenko (Reference Shevchenko2017), Lathe's tidal mechanism of abiogenesis can be potentially generic for circumbinary planets of main-sequence stars; on them, a photo-tidal synchronization is automatically maintained: variations of insolation are synchronized with tides.

When, in the course of the system orbital motion, a CBP is approached by a tide-raising body (any stellar companion), both the tide driven by the host binary star and the radiation flux from the star raise; therefore, the salinity and temperature are expected to, respectively, decrease and increase in concert; and vice versa. In this way, suitable conditions for PCR and TCR are satisfied synchronously, and the amplification process can be more effective (Shevchenko Reference Shevchenko2017).

At present, the amplitudes of the Lunar and Solar equilibrium tides are rather similar: they are equal to 0.36 and 0.16 m, respectively (Murray and Dermott Reference Murray and Dermott1999). In earlier ages, when the Moon was orbiting much closer to the Earth, the Lunar tides could be much higher; see Lathe (Reference Lathe2004, Reference Lathe2005). For a CBP in the HZ of a contact binary formed by Solar-like companions, the amplitudes of the tides raised by the companions would be of the same order as on the Earth.

The tidal phenomena on CBPs of contact-binary stars are however specific, because the tidal bulges raised by the stellar companions in this case are close to each other and strongly overlap; they can be regarded as a single tidal bulge modulated with the binary's rotation frequency. The modulation frequency is effectively doubled if the companions are equal-mass. As shown further on, the driving frequency value is appropriate for maintaining biopolymer chain reactions; further details require a separate analysis, which is beyond the scope of this article.

4. Contact binaries

We consider stellar eclipses in contact binaries as drivers of temperature forcing on CBPs. For the PCR-like reaction be triggered, the forcing frequency should be large enough. Among the ordinary stellar binaries, the tightest ones are contact binaries, mostly represented by W UMa-type stars. For them, the binary mass is ~2 Solar masses, and the binary size (the distance between the companions’ mass centres) is ~2 Solar radii. Generally, W UMa-type stars belong to F, G and K spectral classes, and their ages range from ~5 to ~12 Gyr; see Stȩpień and Gazeas (Reference Stȩpień and Gazeas2012) and references therein. They are rather ubiquitous; thousands of them are catalogued, and they populate the Solar neighbourhood in ratio of ~2 contact binaries for a thousand single stars (Rucinski Reference Rucinski2006). They are believed to be formed from initially detached binaries, as the size of the latter slowly but inevitably diminishes due to the stellar winds and mutual tides, which transfer the angular momentum away (Stȩpień and Gazeas Reference Stȩpień and Gazeas2012). A final merger, manifesting the birth of a rapidly rotating post-binary single, is the natural outcome of this slow evolution.

Let F min and F max be the observed minimum and maximum stellar fluxes during the eclipse cycle of a stellar binary (for an observer on a CBP in an orbit coplanar with the binary's orbit; this coplanarity is typical for the observed CBPs). The corresponding stellar magnitude variation is Δm = 2.5log10(F max/F min). Therefore, if the ratio of fluxes is F max/F min ≈ 2, then the lightcurve relative amplitude Δm ≈ 0.75. This value is rather typical for the observed lightcurves of W UMa-type stars, see Terrell et al. (Reference Terrell, Gross and Cooney2012). This reflects the fact that the companions in the contact binaries have similar sizes, and, besides, the orbital planes of many such binaries are rather moderately inclined to the line of sight, due to selection biases.

Now, let F min and F max be the minimum and maximum stellar fluxes at the surface of a CBP during the eclipse cycle. In a simplest model setting, the temperature variation is determined by the Stefan–Boltzmann law:

(1)$${\Delta T\over T_{\rm min}} = \left({\Delta F\over F_{\rm min}} + 1 \right)^{1/4} - 1 \comma\; $$

where ΔT = T max − T min, ΔF = F max − F min. For ΔF/F min = 1 one has, then, ΔT/T min = 0.189. Therefore, for T min ≈ 300 K (i.e., for a planet in the HZ) one has ΔT ≈ 57°.

More specifically, for Δm = 0.7–0.9, typical for W UMa-type stars (Terrell et al. Reference Terrell, Gross and Cooney2012), one has ΔF max/F min = 0.91–1.29 and, therefore, $\Delta T \approx 50\hbox {-\!-}70^\circ$. For maintaining the authentic PCR, similar temperature amplitudes are perfectly suited; see Mullis et al. (Reference Mullis, Faloona, Scharf, Saiki, Horn and Erlich1986); Lathe (Reference Lathe2004, Reference Lathe2005).

In case of a twin (equal-mass equal-radius) binary the lightcurve period is effectively two times less than the binary's orbital period. The heating/cooling period at the planetary surface is therefore equal to one half of the binary's period. For example, let the orbital period be 8 h = 0.33 d (as in case of the W UMa prototype), then the lightcurve (eclipse) period is 4 h, and the heating/cooling period is 4 h.

The binary orbital period P is given by the Keplerian equation

(2)$$P^2 = {4 \pi^2 a^3\over {{\cal G}} \lpar m_1 + m_2\rpar } \comma\; $$

where ${{\cal G}}$ is the gravitational constant, m 1 ≥ m 2 are the masses of the companions, a is the binary size (the distance between the companions’ mass centres). Let r 1 ≥ r 2 be the radii of the companions, and α = r 2/r 1. Then, for a contact binary whose companions have equal mean densities ρ, one has

(3)$$P^2 = {3 \pi\over {{\cal G}} \rho} \cdot {\lpar 1 + \alpha\rpar ^3\over \lpar 1 + \alpha^3\rpar } \comma\; $$

and, for a twin contact binary (α = 1),

(4)$$P = 2 \left({3 \pi\over {{\cal G}} \rho} \right)^{1/2} .$$

Using equation (4) and data for masses and radii for red dwarfs as given in (Kaltenegger and Traub Reference Kaltenegger and Traub2009, table 1), one obtains the orbital periods equal to ≈200 and ≈27 min for twin contact binaries of spectral classes M0 and M9, respectively. Therefore, the heating/cooling periods are ≈100 and ≈14 min, respectively. For maintaining the authentic PCR (Lathe Reference Lathe2004, Reference Lathe2005; Mullis et al. Reference Mullis, Faloona, Scharf, Saiki, Horn and Erlich1986) such periods are perfectly suited.

However, in the entire sample of the known to date thousands of contact binaries, the shortest measured orbital period is ≈0.22 d = 5.28 h (Stȩpień Reference Stȩpień2006), corresponding to the heating/cooling period ≈2.6 h ≈160 min. The shortest orbital period belongs to CC Com. The absence of observed contact binaries with shorter periods is generally attributed to the slowness of M-dwarf binary inspiralling; it is therefore believed that M-dwarf contact binaries have not yet formed (Stȩpień Reference Stȩpień2006). Comparing the age of the Universe and the time needed to reach the Roche lobe overflow at various stellar masses, one may estimate the expected total (for the two companions in sum) lower mass limit for the observed contact binaries to be ≈1.0–1.2 in Solar units (Stȩpień Reference Stȩpień2006), in accord with the mentioned lower period limit ≈0.22 d. If the given explanation of the contact binary period distribution cut-off is valid, then the massive biopolymer chain reaction scenario may come into play only in a far (Gigayears ahead) future.

5. Biomass inflation

PCR is hyper-efficient to inflate biomass and, therefore, to provide better storage of evolved bioinformation. In a DNA molecule, there are 2400 million atoms in a single strand of a chromosome; thus, its mass is ≈ 7 · 10−14 g. On the other hand, the volume of the World Ocean on the Earth is ≈ 1.3 · 1024 cm3; and its mass is ≈ 1.3 · 1024 g. Therefore, the time needed to produce, starting from one DNA molecule, a World Ocean mass (as an example) of copied molecules (provided that the precursor material is enough) is equal to only ≈ log2 1037 ~100 eclipse cycles.

In case of Solar-like G-dwarf twin contact binaries, the hundred cycles take ~400 h ~2 weeks; and, in case of M-dwarf twin contact binaries, the hundred cycles take only ~1 d. Thus, the biomass inflation time is negligible in comparison with cosmogonical timescales; therefore, possible activity of host stars does not inflict the process.

There exists an obstacle: planets rotate, and, therefore, there may exist periodic time intervals when the rapid heating/cooling cycle is inactive, and this may break the chain reaction. Note, however, that the day-side polar region would be mostly unaffected, if the planet's rotation axis is inclined. Moreover, in case of red-dwarf hosting binaries, the planets inside the HZ are expected to be tidally locked (Barnes Reference Barnes2017), i.e., reside in synchronous spin-orbit resonance. This would permit the chain reactions on the planet's day side to be continuous. Note that in case of late-type M dwarfs there may be even no need for the planet to be tidally locked, because the amplification process saturates in less than a day.

Apart from PCR-type reactions, the TCR may also be active, due to what in the Earth case is called the lunitidal interval – the time lag of the tide maximum after the geometrically closest passage of the Moon. The lunitidal interval on Earth can be as large as ~2 h; generally, it may take a whole spectrum of values, depending on many local and global geophysical factors (Grant Gross Reference Grant Gross1971). Therefore, at least at some localities on a planetary surface, PCR and TCR may well act in concertFootnote 4.

Note that, inside the HZ, the entire spectrum of temperatures, from zero to ≈ 100°C, allowing for the water liquid state, can be maintained, depending on the planetary orbital radius. Besides, the broad range of temperatures can be maintained on any planet inside the HZ. For example, for a tidally locked planetFootnote 5, the temperature would be maximum in the planetary surface locations where the host star is in zenith, and would sharply decrease towards the day-night line. Therefore, suitable locations for maintaining biopolymer chain reactions seem to be always potentially present, both in the orbital space inside the HZ and in the planetary surface areas.

During the W UMa stage, the possible enormous production of biomaterial on CBPs in HZs would inevitably force the biomaterial to penetrate throughout the planetary surfaces and close-to-surface inner volumes, thus providing safer shelters allowing for the survival of the bioinformation during any violent space weather storms associated with the host binary star merger. As in any extinction event, the more material is stored beforehand (especially in safe shelters), the more material is expected to survive.

6. Post-binary potential biosystem reboot

SX Phe-type stars are A–F type main-sequence stars that pulsate with short periods (down to 0.03 d) and large amplitudes (up to 0.8m); see Eggen and Iben (Reference Eggen and Iben2009); Nemec et al. (Reference Nemec, Balona, Murphy, Kinemuchi and Jeon2017); McNamara (Reference McNamara2011). These properties provide almost the same, as in the W UMa-type stars case, conditions for maintaining the BCR on their planets in habitability zones. In fact, the shortness and general similarity of periods of the contact-binary rotations and the post-binary pulsations seem to be not at all accidental: indeed, the fundamental mode pulsations of a post-binary star have the period $P \sim \lpar {{\cal G}} \rho \rpar ^{-1/2}$, which coincides with the period given by equation (4) for the pre-merging contact-binary rotation.

Thus, the post-binary stars pulsate with periods and amplitudes well suited for maintaining the BCR. The SX Phe-type stars are presumably post-binaries, i.e., products of stellar mergers. Therefore, the ‘W UMa–SX Phe’ metamorphosis (from a contact binary to a post-binary, via the merger) may potentially provide a potential biosystem reboot on planets in these systems.

Note that after the host binary merger, the excessive angular momentum is transferred away by a circumstellar excretion disk newly formed of ex-stellar material. New young planets may form in such disks (Melis et al. Reference Melis, Gielen, Chen, Rhee, Song and Zuckerman2011; Martin et al. Reference Martin, Spruit and Tata2011; Stȩpień and Kiraga Reference Stȩpień and Kiraga2013). One may speculate that, before the merger, by means of BCR the bioinformation is massively stored to provide a post-merger bio-evolution revival in the old or a newly formed planetary system. After the merger, the survived bioinformation may serve as a basis for a further bio-evolution under a more massive and quiet star – a post-binary single. Contact-binary stars and post-binary single stars (presumably, red, yellow and blue stragglers) may therefore be of especial observational interest as potential hosts of biomarked planets.

The stellar activity, especially the pre-merger one in W UMa-type systems may hinder the detection of biosignatures; therefore, SX Phe-type systems can be chosen as observational targets in this respect first of all.

Generally, in comparison with W UMa-type systems, SX Phe-type ones are expected to possess more quiescent space weather environmental conditions, maybe calm enough to allow for a prokaryotic biosphere similar to that of the early Earth. An evolved biosphere, resembling that of the present-day Earth, may be expected Gigayears later on.

The bio-evolution should include compartmentalization, with self-replicating biopolymers being then contained within protocells. Hypothetically, this step may be not favoured during the W UMa stage, especially for M-dwarf binary systems, due to the potentially active pre-merger behaviour of the stars. However, during the subsequent SX Phe stage, the host star is expected to be calmer, and the bio-evolution may proceed further on.

To author's knowledge, apart from W UMa-type and SX Phe-type stars, no other type of stellar objects may provide suitable periodic variation in heating/cooling radiation fluxes and, therefore, be efficient for maintaining the BCR on planets.

7. Conclusions

Concluding, we have shown that planets of contact-binary and post-binary (W UMa-type and SX Phe-type) stars represent perfect places for maintaining biopolymer chain reactions once the planet is in the stellar HZ.

Indeed, on such planets, the two basic conditions for biopolymer chain reactions are potentially satisfied: universal suitable amplitudes, $\sim 50\hbox {-\!-}70 {^\circ }$, and universal suitable periods, ~0.3–3 h, of the surface temperature variation. Contact-binary red dwarfs and their immediate post-binary descendants are especially favoured, as they provide (1) ultra-short periods of the temperature forcing, and (2) tidal locking of planets in the HZ.

In view of the outstanding properties of W UMa-type and SX Phe-type stars, one may hypothesize that the ‘W UMa–SX Phe’ metamorphosis provides a potential biosystem reboot on planets in these systems.

The PCR-induced potential inflation of biomass from one biopolymer molecule mass to a World Ocean mass, if there are enough precursors, is complete in ~100 stellar eclipse or pulsation cycles, i.e., it is instantaneous in comparison with cosmogonical timescales.

Contact-binary and post-binary stars (presumably, red, yellow and blue stragglers) can be of especial observational interest as potential hosts of biomarked planets.

Acknowledgments

The author is grateful to the referees for useful remarks and comments. This work was supported in part by the grant ‘Theoretical and experimental studies of the formation and evolution of extrasolar planetary systems and characteristics of exoplanets’ (grant number 13.1902.21.0039) of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation.

Financial support

No competing financial interests exist.

Conflict of interest

The author reports no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

1 Note that the habitability of single stars leaving the main sequence is not generally ruled out, as the radially shifted and enlarged habitability zone (HZ) starts to steadily engulf planetary orbits that are more and more distant from the host star; inside the evolved HZ, planets may belong to the Earth and super-Earth exoplanet classes. Besides, once in the HZ, large satellites of giant planets may also constitute suitable niches for life (see, e.g., Heller and Barnes Reference Heller and Barnes2013; Hinkel and Kane Reference Hinkel and Kane2013; and references therein).

2 A circumbinary planet (CBP) is a planet that orbits around a stellar binary.

3 An environment is habitable, if it is able to sustain life in its known forms. Habitability is a necessary, but not sufficient condition for life to be able to emerge in an environment. In this article, we address the habitability problem in a broad sense, including the potential for life to arise de novo. Concerning conditions for the habitability, those for carbon/water-based lifeforms are implied here; the temperature bounds are therefore taken to be accordingly constrained.

4 One may presume that life on Earth emerged from hyperthermophiles principally in an aqueous environment, and the ocean temperatures at that epoch were close to 100°C. Then, the temperature variations are naturally constrained from above by the water boiling limit. From below, the allowed temperature limit is uncertain, but could be lower, depending on planetary surface locations. (An uncertainty arises because the atmospheric pressure, affecting the boiling point of water, can be different in different time epochs and on different planets.) However, on the considered types of planets, the TCR-driving salinity variations (evoked by the drying and tidal cyclicity) and the PCR-driving temperature variations (evoked by the incident radiation cyclicity) can be rapid enough to drive the both reactions efficiently.

5 The tidal lock is expected for planets in HZs of M-dwarfs.

References

Armstrong, DJ, Osborn, HP, Brown, DJA, Faedi, F, Gómez Maqueo Chew, Y, Martin, DV, Pollacco, D and Udry, S (2014) On the abundance of circumbinary planets. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 444, 18731883.10.1093/mnras/stu1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, R (2017) Tidal locking of habitable exoplanets. Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 129, 509536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batygin, K, Morbidelli, A and Holman, MJ (2015) Chaotic disintegration of the inner Solar system. The Astrophysical Journal 799, 120 (16pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggen, OJ and Iben, I (1989) Starbursts, blue stragglers, and binary stars in local superclusters and groups. II. The old disk and halo populations. Astronomical Journal 97, 431457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, DP, Barnes, R, Graham, DE, Luger, R and Quinn, TR (2018) On the lack of circumbinary planets orbiting isolated binary stars. The Astrophysical Journal 858, 86 (24pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant Gross, M (1971) Oceanography, 2nd Edn. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co., p. 114.Google Scholar
Hamers, AS, Perets, HB and Portegies Zwart, SF (2016) A triple origin for the lack of tight coplanar circumbinary planets around short-period binaries. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455, 31803200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, R and Barnes, R (2013) Exomoon habitability constrained by illumination and tidal heating. Astrobiology 13, 1846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinkel, NR and Kane, SR (2013) Habitability of exomoons at the Hill or tidal-locking radius. The Astrophysical Journal 774, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, H-C and Zakamska, NL (2020) Lifetime of short-period binaries measured from their Galactic kinematics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 493, 22712286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaltenegger, L and Traub, WA (2009) Transits of Earth-like planets. The Astrophysical Journal 698, 519527.10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laskar, J (1994) Large-scale chaos in the Solar system. Astronomy and Astrophysics 287, L9L12.Google Scholar
Laskar, J and Gastineau, M (2009) Existence of collisional trajectories of Mercury, Mars and Venus with the Earth. Nature 459, 817819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lathe, R (2004) Fast tidal cycling and the origin of life. Icarus 168, 1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lathe, R (2005) Tidal chain reaction and the origin of replicating biopolymers. International Journal of Astrobiology 4, 1931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lathe, R (2006) Early tides: Response to Varga et al. Icarus 180, 277280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lathe, R (2012) Tidal cycling and the origin of the genetic code. In Seckbach, J (ed.), Genesis, in the Beginning. New York: Springer, pp. 691707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marguet, E and Forterre, P (1994) DNA stability at temperatures typical for hyperthermophiles. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 16811686.10.1093/nar/22.9.1681CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marguet, E and Forterre, P (2001) Stability and manipulation of DNA at extreme temperatures. Methods in Enzymology 334, 205215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, DV and Triaud, AHMJ (2014) Planets transiting non-eclipsing binaries. Astronomy and Astrophysics 570, A91 (19pp).10.1051/0004-6361/201323112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, EL, Spruit, HC and Tata, R (2011) A binary merger origin for inflated hot Jupiter planets. Astronomy and Astrophysics 535, A50 (6pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, DV, Mazeh, T and Fabrycky, DC (2015) No circumbinary planets transiting the tightest Kepler binaries – a possible fingerprint of a third star. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 453, 35543567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, DH (2011) Delta Scuti, SX Phoenicis, and RR Lyrae stars in galaxies and globular clusters. Astronomical Journal 142, 110 (22pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melis, C, Gielen, C, Chen, CH, Rhee, JH, Song, I and Zuckerman, B (2010) Shocks and a giant planet in the disk orbiting BP Piscium?. The Astrophysical Journal 724, 470479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, M and Kratter, KM (2018) Dynamical formation of close binaries during the pre-main-sequence phase. The Astrophysical Journal 854, 44 (21pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullis, K, Faloona, F, Scharf, S, Saiki, R, Horn, G and Erlich, H (1986) Specific enzymatic amplification of DNA in vitro: the polymerase chain reaction. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology 51, 263273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muñoz, DJ and Lai, D (2015) Survival of planets around shrinking stellar binaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 92649269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, CD and Dermott, SF (1999) Solar System Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nemec, JM, Balona, LA, Murphy, SJ, Kinemuchi, K and Jeon, Y -B (2017) Metal-rich SX Phe stars in the Kepler field. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 466, 12901329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribas, I (2010) The Sun and stars as the primary energy input in planetary atmospheres. In Kosovichev, AG, Andrei, AH and Rozelot, J-P (eds), Solar and Stellar Variability – Impact on Earth and Planets (Proc. IAU Symp. 264). Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 318.Google Scholar
Rucinski, SM (2006) Luminosity function of contact binaries based on the All Sky Automated Survey (ASAS). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 368, 13191322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevchenko, II (2017) Habitability properties of circumbinary planets. Astronomical Journal 153, 273 (14pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shevchenko, II (2018) Tidal decay of circumbinary planetary systems. Astronomical Journal 156, 52 (8pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slawson, RW, Prša, A, Welsh, WF, Orosz, JA, Rucker, M, Batalha, N, Doyle, LR, Engle, SG, Conroy, K, Coughlin, J, Gregg, TA, Fetherolf, T, Short, DR, Windmiller, G, Fabrycky, DC, Howell, SB, Jenkins, JM, Uddin, K, Mullally, F, Seader, SE, Thompson, SE, Sanderfer, DT, Borucki, W and Koch, D (2011) Kepler eclipsing binary stars. II. 2165 Eclipsing binaries in the second data release. Astronomical Journal 142, 160 (14pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stȩpień, K (2006) The low-mass limit for total mass of W UMa-type binaries. Acta Astronomica 56, 347364.Google Scholar
Stȩpień, K and Gazeas, K (2012) Evolution of low mass contact binaries. Acta Astronomica 62, 153177.Google Scholar
Stȩpień, K and Kiraga, M (2013) The ultimate fate of low-mass contact binary evolution: planetary system? Central European Astrophysical Bulletin 37, 381390.Google Scholar
Terrell, D, Gross, J and Cooney, WR (2012) A BVRCIC survey of W Ursae Majoris binaries. Astronomical Journal 143, 99 (7pp).CrossRefGoogle Scholar