Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T18:54:51.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bacteria Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, terrestrial analogue of extraterrestrial microorganisms?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2024

Grzegorz Piotr Slowik
Affiliation:
Institute of Materials and Biomedical Engineering, University of Zielona Gora, Zielona Gora, Poland;
Renee Richer
Affiliation:
Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China;
Aleksandra Zofia Stryjska*
Affiliation:
Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, China; Duke University, Durham, USA
Pawel Dabrowski
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
*
Corresponding author: Aleksandra Z. Stryjska; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this comprehensive review, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, an acidophilic bacterium, has been thoroughly examined as a plausible analogue for microbial life in Venus's lower cloud layer. Given its ability to adapt to extreme conditions, including low pH environments and metal-rich settings, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is considered a promising candidate for studying life analogues in Venus's clouds. This article comprehensively analyses the bacterium's distinctive phenotypic and genotypic features, investigating its metabolic pathways, adaptive strategies and potential ecological niche within Venusian cloud ecosystems. After careful consideration of the environmental parameters characterizing Venus, the unidentified UV absorber in its clouds, and the prospects for microbial life, this review underscores the imperative nature of future Venus missions and the pivotal role that Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans may play in exploring the possible habitability of Venus and advancing astrobiological research.

Type
Review Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Extremophiles are organisms such as prokaryotic bacteria and archaea and eukaryotic organisms (Salwan and Sharma, Reference Salwan and Sharma2020) that are able to grow, from an anthropocentric point of view, in extreme and inhospitable environmental conditions (Gallo et al., Reference Gallo, Puopolo, Carbonaro, Maresca and Fiorentino2021) such as high or low pH, or very low or high temperature (Rampelotto, Reference Rampelotto2013). Moreover, various types of extremophiles, such as psychrophiles and thermophiles, in the case of Deception Island volcano in Antarctica, can coexist (Bendia et al., Reference Bendia, Araujo, Pulschen, Contro, Duarte, Rodrigues, Galante and Pellizari2018). Extremophiles have adapted to life in extremely harsh conditions, evolving traits that allows them to survive in given physicochemical conditions (Horikoshi et al., Reference Horikoshi, Antranikian, Bull, Robb and Stetter2010). The extremophiles can be delineated according to a given environmental factor and the limit values for specific terrestrial microorganisms (Table 1).

Table 1. Classification of extremophilic organisms, taking into account their limit values for growth

In this review, after taking into account the environment and physicochemical conditions in the lower layer of Venus clouds located 47.5–50.5 km above its surface, the focus was on a representative of acidophilic extremophiles, the bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Studies on the properties of this bacterium, in particular experimental studies under laboratory-recreated conditions prevailing in the lower layer of Venus clouds, may contribute to distinguishing the types of terrestrial analogues to those potentially existing in the clouds of this microbial planet (Limaye et al., Reference Limaye, Mogul, Smith, Ansari, Słowik and Vaishampayan2018).

A brief description of acidophilic bacteria and their natural environment

Acidophiles are organisms that grow optimally in an environment with a pH significantly lower than 7 (Johnson, Reference Johnson, Gerday and Glansdorff2007). The environment of moderate acidophiles is characterized by a pH in the range of 3–5, while extreme acidophiles develop at a pH less than 3 (Johnson, Reference Johnson, Gerday and Glansdorff2007). The intracellular pH of acidophilic organisms is approximately neutral (Johnson, Reference Johnson, Gerday and Glansdorff2007). The methods developed by acidophiles to maintain this pH are: (a) high impermeability of their cell membranes to hydronium ions (H3O+), as well as (b) positive potential within these membranes (Johnson, Reference Johnson, Gerday and Glansdorff2007). Extreme acidophiles are strictly microorganisms and can be both prokaryotes and eukaryotes (Johnson, Reference Johnson, Gerday and Glansdorff2007), with representatives found in each of the three domains in the phylogenetic tree of life (Johnson, Reference Johnson, Gerday and Glansdorff2007). The group of acidophilic, iron- and sulphur-oxidizing organisms includes microorganisms such as (Johnson, Reference Johnson, Gerday and Glansdorff2007): Leptospirillum spp. (Leptospirillum ferrooxidans, Leptospirillum thermoferrooxidans, Leptospirillum ferriphilum, Leptospirillum ferrodiazotrophum), Acidithiobacillus spp. (Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans, Acidithiobacillus albertensis, Acidithiobacillus caldus), Hydrogenobaculum acidophilum (Hydrogenobaculum acidophilum, Hydrogenobaculum (H55)), and Thiobacillus spp. (Thiobacillus thioparus, Thiobacillus prosperus, Thiobacillus ferrooxidans). Acidophilic sulfur-oxidative archaea are represented by: Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, Sulfolobus metallicus, Sulfolobus tokodaii, Metallosphaera spp. and Sulfurococcus yellowstonensis.

Characteristics of the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria

Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, a genus of Gammaproteobacteria, are known for their role as sulphur and iron oxidants (Schuler and Tsuchiya, Reference Schuler and Tsuchiya1975) and are classified as Gram-negative, chemolithoautotrophs (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Long, Wang and Lau Vetter2024). This means that they can grow on inorganic substances (Lin et al., Reference Lin, Liu, Shan, Zhang and Yang2024). This ability to utilize inorganic substrates in extreme conditions, such as very low pH environments, makes them an important model for studying extraterrestrial life. These bacteria, originally isolated from a sour coal mine and described by Colmer and Hinkle (Reference Colmer and Hinkle1947), gained recognition for their unique morphological and physiological properties. Before the reclassification in 2000 (Kelly and Wood, Reference Kelly and Wood2000), Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria were known as Thiobacillus ferrooxidans (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Yan, Xing, Chen, Zhang and Wang2018c). In this study 98 strains of them were listed (Table 2). Moreover, micrographs of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, strain DSM 583 are presented (Figs. 1 and 2).

Table 2. Strains of the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria

ATCC, American Type Culture Collection; CCM, Czech Collection of Microorganisms; KCTC, Korean Collection of Type Cultures.

Figure 1. Micrograph of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (DSM 583) at 12 000× magnification.

Figure 2. Micrograph of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (DSM 583) at 8000× magnification.

These microorganisms do not produce spore forms (Quatrini and Johnson, Reference Quatrini and Johnson2019) and are widespread in nature (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Yan, Xing, Chen, Zhang and Wang2018c), inhabiting various geoclimactic natural environments characterized by low pH (Quatrini and Johnson, Reference Quatrini and Johnson2019). Across the different strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, there are differences in oxidative ability of the same substrates, resistance to heavy metal ions, and optimal pH and temperature for growth (Ageeva et al., Reference Ageeva, Kondrateva and Karavaiko2001). These bacteria can grow in mineral rich, acid environments containing different elements (Table 3). They are found in sulphated soils and rocks as well as in mine waters containing uranium ore (Berthelot et al., Reference Berthelot, Leduc and Ferroni1993), being resistant even to high concentrations of uranium in ore (Dekker et al., Reference Dekker, Arsène-Ploetze and Santini2016). The optimal pH for most strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is about 2 (Quatrini and Johnson, Reference Quatrini and Johnson2019). The minimum pH required for growth ranges from 1.3 to 1.5, depending on the strain of this bacterium (Johnson, Reference Johnson, Gerday and Glansdorff2007), while the typical extracellular pH values in which they grow are from 1.5 to 3 (Quatrini and Johnson, Reference Quatrini and Johnson2019). The intracellular pH of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is about 6.5 (Quatrini and Johnson, Reference Quatrini and Johnson2019). Carbon necessary for the biosynthesis of cellular material is obtained by assimilating carbon dioxide (Campodonico et al., Reference Campodonico, Vaisman, Castro, Razmilic, Mercado, Andrews, Feist and Asenjo2016) from the atmosphere in the Calvin–Benson–Bassham cycle (CBB) (Gale and Beck, Reference Gale and Beck1967; Esparza et al., Reference Esparza, Cárdenas, Bowien, Jedlicki and Holmes2010; Quatrini and Johnson, Reference Quatrini and Johnson2019). These bacteria are diazotrophic organisms that can also bind atmospheric nitrogen and assimilate ammonia (Valdés et al., Reference Valdés, Pedroso, Quatrini, Dodson, Tettelin, Blake, Eisen and Holmes2008). As an alternative source for phosphorus, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans can use ethyl and methyl phosphonates for their growth (Vera et al., Reference Vera, Pagliai, Guiliani and Jerez2008). They can also proliferate under high pressure (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Hedrich, Ostertag-Henning and Schippers2018a). Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria play an important ecological role in the bioremediation process due to their ability to decontaminate soil and industrial wastewater from heavy metals (Appia-Ayme et al., Reference Appia-Ayme, Guiliani, Ratouchniak and Bonnefoy1999). As electrotrophs, this bacterium can grow powered by electrons from cathodes and anodes, according to the following reactions (Yamanaka, Reference Yamanaka2008):

(1)$$2{\rm H}^ + { + } 2{\rm e}^-\to {\rm H}_2\quad ( {{\rm with\ the\ cathode}} ) $$
(2)$$2{\rm F}{\rm e}^{2 + }-2{\rm e}^-\to {\rm F}{\rm e}^{3 + }\quad ( {{\rm with\ the\ anode}} ) $$

Table 3. Division of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria into strains via bacterial activity

Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans can also grow anaerobically (Pronk et al., Reference Pronk, Bruyn, Bos and Kuenen1992; Valdés et al., Reference Valdés, Pedroso, Quatrini, Dodson, Tettelin, Blake, Eisen and Holmes2008). Anaerobic respiration of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria is not only based on Fe3+ iron, as they can also use other electron donors derived from elemental sulphur and hydrogen (Ohmura et al., Reference Ohmura, Sasaki, Matsumoto and Saiki2002).

Metabolic processes of the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria

The metabolic processes of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, a resilient bacterium with potential implications beyond Earth, have long been a subject of interest and curiosity among researchers. In addition, exploring the metabolic pathways of this organism could offer valuable insights into how microorganisms adapt metabolically to extraterrestrial environments, thereby positioning Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans as a model organism for such studies (Janiczek et al., Reference Janiczek, Mandl and Ceskova1998; Nemati et al., Reference Nemati, Harrison, Hansford and Webb1998). These acidophilic extremophiles have gained attention for their metabolic prowess, particularly in the context of industrial biomining and biohydrometallurgical processes (Torma, Reference Torma, Ghose, Fiechter and Blakebrough1977; Osorio et al., Reference Osorio, Mangold, Denis, Ñancucheo, Esparza, Johnson, Bonnefoy, Dopson and Holmes2003; Yamanaka, Reference Yamanaka2008; Ai et al., Reference Ai, Liang, Miao, Chen, Zeng and Qiu2018). Due to their abilities Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans can be used to desulphurize coal by oxidizing the pyrite contained in the carbonic substance. This process, with the use of bacteria, can be presented as follows (3) (Janiczek et al., Reference Janiczek, Mandl and Ceskova1998; Nemati et al., Reference Nemati, Harrison, Hansford and Webb1998):

(3)$$4{\rm Fe}{\rm S}_2 + 15{\rm O}_2 + 2{\rm H}_2{\rm O}\to 2{\rm F}{\rm e}_2( {{\rm S}{\rm O}_4} ) _3 + 2{\rm H}_2{\rm S}{\rm O}_4$$

The process of oxidation (bioxidation) of ferrous ions and pyrite by the ultimate recipients of the energy released is represented by chemical reactions (4) (Bevilaqua et al. Reference Bevilaqua, Garcia and Tuovinen2010; Jafari et al. Reference Jafari, Shafaei, Abdollahi, Gharabaghi and Chelgani2016) and (5) (Yamanaka, Reference Yamanaka2008; Colmer et al. Reference Colmer, Temple and Hinkle1950):

  1. (a) (bio)oxidation of ferrous ion:

    (4)$$2{\rm F}{\rm e}^{2 + } + 2{\rm H}^ + { + } 0.5{\rm O}_2\to 2{\rm F}{\rm e}^{3 + } + {\rm H}_2{\rm O}$$
  2. (b) (bio)oxidation of pyrite:

    (5)$${\rm Fe}{\rm S}_2 + 3.5{\rm O}_2 + {\rm H}_2{\rm O}\to {\rm F}{\rm e}^{2 + } + 2{\rm S}{\rm O}_4^{2-} + 2{\rm H}^ + $$

Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans can also remove hydrogen sulphide (H2S) from the environment in a two-step process (Halfmeier et al., Reference Halfmeier, Schiifer-Treffenfeldt and Reuss1993, Part 1) presented by reactions (6) and (7) (Barsoukov Reference Barsoukov2018; Bevilaqua et al. Reference Bevilaqua, Acciari, Arena, Benedetti, Fugivara, Tremiliosi Filho and Júnior2009):

(6)$${\rm H}_2{\rm S} + {\rm F}{\rm e}_2( {{\rm S}{\rm O}_4} ) _3\to {\rm S}^0 + 2{\rm FeS}{\rm O}_4 + {\rm H}_2{\rm S}{\rm O}_4$$
(7)$$4{\rm FeS}{\rm O}_4 + {\rm O}_2 + 2{\rm H}_2{\rm S}{\rm O}_4\to 2{\rm F}{\rm e}_2( {{\rm S}{\rm O}_4} ) _3 + 2{\rm H}_2{\rm O}$$

These bacteria can grow on numerous electron donor and acceptor substrates (Yarzábal et al., Reference Yarzábal, Brasseur and Bonnefoy2002a), such as elemental sulphur lumps (Espejo and Romero, Reference Espejo and Romero1987). The elemental oxidation of sulphur (S) by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is illustrated by the following chemical reactions (8) (Janiczek et al., Reference Janiczek, Mandl and Ceskova1998):

(8)$$2{\rm S} + 3{\rm O}_2 + 2{\rm H}_2{\rm O}\to 2{\rm F}{\rm e}_2( {{\rm S}{\rm O}_4} ) _3 + 2{\rm H}_2{\rm S}{\rm O}_4$$

The growth kinetics of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans on sulphur was examined in theoretical and experimental terms and used to determine vital microbiological and stoichiometric values. The data obtained for sulphur was then compared with analogous values obtained for metal sulphides (Konishi et al., Reference Konishi, Takasaka and Asai1994). Individual strains of the bacterium show similar behaviour during their action on various sulphide minerals (Harneit et al., Reference Harneit, Göksel, Kock, Klock, Gehrke and Sand2006).

The metabolic activity of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans growing on reduced sulphur compounds can be studied by capillary isotachophoresis (Janiczek et al., Reference Janiczek, Mandl and Ceskova1998). The biogeochemical activity of these bacteria can also be monitored via analysis of their cellular ATP (Pakostova et al., Reference Pakostova, Mandl, Pokorna, Diviskova and Lojek2013a).

Various, simple organic compounds (e.g. formic acid – Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans can grow in formic acid (Pronk et al., Reference Pronk, Meijer, Hazeu, van Dijken, Bos and Kuenen1991), acetic acid, urea and cysteine) on the inhibition of the growth of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans during the sulphur and iron oxidation processes was also observed (Tuttle and Dugan, Reference Tuttle and Dugan1976). Synergistic cooperation of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans with other types of bacteria was observed for instance in the process of copper bioleaching (Zheng and Li, Reference Zheng and Li2016). A cooperative interaction during sulphur oxidation between Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and planktonic cells (which can be characterized as free-floating microorganisms, that inhabit aquatic environments) was also noticed as a result of monitoring which bio-available substrates were delivered to planktonic cells (Pakostova et al., Reference Pakostova, Mandl and Tuovinen2013b). A cooperative interaction during sulphur oxidation between Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and planktonic cells was also noticed as a result of monitoring which bio-available substrates were delivered to planktonic cells (Pakostova et al., Reference Pakostova, Mandl and Tuovinen2013b).

The metabolism of microorganisms potentially present in the lower layer of Venus' clouds may be analogous to that of terrestrial microorganisms. The metabolic processes of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans indicate that the bacteria could potentially serve as an example of such analogue (Limaye et al., Reference Limaye, Mogul, Smith, Ansari, Słowik and Vaishampayan2018). As one of the possible sources of substrates for metabolism of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, they could be particles of volcanic ash, which under earth conditions, depending on their size, can stay in the air for weeks and even travel thousands of kilometers from the eruption site (Corradini et al., Reference Corradini, Montopoli, Guerrieri, Ricci, Scollo, Merucci, Marzano, Pugnaghi, Prestifilippo, Ventress, Grainger, Carboni, Vulpiani and Coltelli2016). The atmospheric dynamics of Venus cause ash particles to be suspended in its lower cloud layer, which could serve as a potential habitat for microorganisms. It is also conceivable that sand and dust particles may play a similar role (Lorenz, Reference Lorenz2016). These particulate surfaces, which include volcanic ash, provide a conducive environment for the emergence and evolution of protocells. As templates, they facilitate the assembly of essential biomolecules such as lipids, amino acids and nucleotides, thereby promoting gradual protocell formation and development. Furthermore, their porous nature creates a protective and enclosed environment that encourages the progression towards more complex protocell structures (Ferris, Reference Ferris, Abers, Zelt, Taylor and Roecker2006).

The genome of the bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans

Genomes of selected strains of the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria was completely sequenced (Valdés et al., Reference Valdés, Pedroso, Quatrini, Dodson, Tettelin, Blake, Eisen and Holmes2008; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Zhang, Zhao, Ni, Wang and Yan2019b; Kato et al., Reference Kato, Guo, Fujimura, Nakamura, Nishizawa, Kurusu and Ohta2022) in the same manner as the genomes of other acidophilic microorganisms, such as the archaea Thermoplasma acidophilum, Picrophilus torridus, Sulfolobus tokodaii and Ferroplasma acidarmanus (Johnson, Reference Johnson, Gerday and Glansdorff2007). Knowledge of the genome sequence of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans can provide information on the physiology and metabolism of these bacteria (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Yan, Wu, Xu, Li, Wang, Liang and Li2015). The genome of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria ranges from 2.89 to 4.18 Mb depending on the genomovar in which it exist (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Yan, Xing, Chen, Zhang and Wang2018c) four genomovars have been identified based on the strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans collected in different parts of the world, some of which were not attached to any of them (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Yan, Xing, Chen, Zhang and Wang2018c). So, for example, the ATCC 23270 strain of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is characterized by a genome in the form of a single, circular chromosome containing almost 3 million base pairs (~3 Mb) with almost 60% guanine and cytosine content (Valdés et al., Reference Valdés, Pedroso, Quatrini, Dodson, Tettelin, Blake, Eisen and Holmes2008). Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans from the DLC-5 strain have a similar genome size (~3 Mb), with a circular chromosome and a similar percentage of guanine and cytosine in the genome (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Yan, Wu, Xu, Li, Wang, Liang and Li2015). The number of proteins in the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (ATCC 23270) genome encoding genes is over three thousand (Valdés et al., Reference Valdés, Pedroso, Quatrini, Dodson, Tettelin, Blake, Eisen and Holmes2008). The functional categories of the genome of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (ATCC 23270) are associated with the cell envelope, transport and binding proteins and the energy of metabolism (Valdés et al., Reference Valdés, Pedroso, Quatrini, Dodson, Tettelin, Blake, Eisen and Holmes2008). In the mobile part of the genome, the presence of integrative conjugation elements (ICE), important in the process of horizontal gene transfer (Bustamante et al., Reference Bustamante, Covarrubias, Levicán, Katz, Tapia, Holmes, Quatrini and Orellana2012), was seen. Phenotypically, many strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans are similar to each other, but differentiated by the 16S rRNA gene sequence and the overall composition of DNA (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Sun, Kou, Zhao, Wei and Xing2018b). The transcriptomic studies, based on DNA microarray techniques, have identified a reference set of genes in the genome of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans: map, rpoC, alaS and era. This has allowed for better interpretation of gene-expression profiles contained in this genome (Nieto et al., Reference Nieto, Covarrubias, Jedlicki, Holmes and Quatrini2009). Individual strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans contain plasmids (Rawlings, Reference Rawlings2005; Chen et al., Reference Chen, Yan, Wu, Xu, Li, Wang, Liang and Li2015), though their presence in the genome of the bacterium was not found at all (Valdés et al., Reference Valdés, Pedroso, Quatrini, Dodson, Tettelin, Blake, Eisen and Holmes2008). Plasmids may presumably regulate the intensity of the oxidation process performed by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (Ageeva et al., Reference Ageeva, Kondrat'eva and Karavaiko2003). Studies carried out on 27 strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans showed polymorphism occurring in their plasmid profiles (Kondrat'eva et al., Reference Kondrat'eva, Ageeva, Muntyan, Pivovarova and Karavaiko2002). The Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans genome has genes encoding various forms of the RubisCO enzyme (Dekker et al., Reference Dekker, Arsène-Ploetze and Santini2016). This protein mediates the absorption of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) (Bracher et al., Reference Bracher, Whitney, Hartl and Hayer-Hartl2017), but it can also contribute to the resistance of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans to uranium (Dekker et al., Reference Dekker, Arsène-Ploetze and Santini2016). The oxygen reduction pathway associated with the multicentre iron respiratory chain in the bacterium Acidthiobacillus ferrooxidans (Li et al., Reference Li, Painter, Ban and Blake2015) creates a protein supercomplex (Castelle et al., Reference Castelle, Guiral, Malarte, Ledgham, Leroy, Brugna and Giudici-Orticoni2008). The proteins that create it lie inside and outside the cell membrane as well as in the periplasm, where oxygen reduction also occurs (Kai et al., Reference Kai, Fukumori and Yamanaka1989; Castelle et al., Reference Castelle, Guiral, Malarte, Ledgham, Leroy, Brugna and Giudici-Orticoni2008). In Acidthiobacillus ferrooxidans, in the process of iron oxidation, the main electron acceptor is cytochrome c, which then transfers it to another protein called rusticinin (RCy) (Hazra, Reference Hazra1992). This protein plays an important role during electron transfer in the iron respiration process of Acidthiobacillus ferrooxidans (Blake and Shute, Reference Blake and Shute1987; Ronk et al., Reference Ronk, Shively, Shute and Blake1991; Djebli et al., Reference Djebli, Proctor, Blake and Shoham1992; Hazra, Reference Hazra1992; Yarzábal et al., Reference Yarzábal, Duquesne and Bonnefoy2003). Rusticyanin is characterized by a very high oxidation–reduction (redox) potential (Barrett et al., Reference Barrett, Harvey, Sundararajan, Surendran, Hall, Ellis, Hough, Strange, Hillier and Hasnain2006). Its amino acid sequence was determined by micro-sequencing and mass spectrometry techniques based on the structural characteristics of tryptic peptides and Asp-N endoproteinase (Ronk et al., Reference Ronk, Shively, Shute and Blake1991). The operon which encodes the specific types of cytochromes c, which are proteins involved in energetic metabolism in bacteria, in the process of electron transfer (Appia-Ayme et al., Reference Appia-Ayme, Guiliani, Ratouchniak and Bonnefoy1999) during Fe2+ oxidation (Valkova-Valchanova and Chan, Reference Valkova-Valchanova and Chan1994) was also characterized. Computer analysis of the genomes of selected strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans showed that the synthesis of cytochrome c in these cells is dependent on the type of electron donor, which is associated with the type of medium (iron or sulphur) on which the mentioned strains grew. Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacterial cells growing on iron (Fe2+) were characterized by a higher number of cytochrome c than those growing on sulphur (S0) (Yarzábal et al., Reference Yarzábal, Brasseur and Bonnefoy2002a). Identification and characterization of these cytochromes found them to be localized specifically to the outer cell membrane (Yarzábal et al., Reference Yarzábal, Brasseur, Ratouchniak, Lund, Lemesle-Meunier, DeMoss and Bonnefoy2002b). The studies on the molecular mechanisms of iron oxidation (Fe2+ to Fe3+), from which Acidthiobacillus ferrooxidans draws energy to survive, have identified the tce gene cluster responsible for coding cytochrome c and cytochrome c552 (type cytochrome c4) (Ai et al., Reference Ai, Liang, Miao, Chen, Zeng and Qiu2018). To investigate the reaction kinetics of electron transport between rusticyanine and cytochrome c4 (CYC41) present in Acidthiobacillus ferrooxidans, the stopped-flow spectrophotometric method and the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) technique were used. To determine the crystalline structure of cytochrome c4, the multiwavelength anomalous diffraction (MAD) method, a type of X-ray crystallography, can be used (Abergel et al., Reference Abergel, Nitschke, Malarte, Bruschi, Claverie and Giudici-Orticoni2003). The energetics of metabolism of Acidthiobacillus ferrooxidans was also analysed in the context of genes encoding electron transfer proteins based on biochemical and genetic data (Appia-Ayme et al., Reference Appia-Ayme, Guiliani, Ratouchniak and Bonnefoy1999). An analysis of the physicochemical properties of cytochrome c4 was performed, obtaining EPR spectra and absorption spectra of amino acid composition, both in the context of the strains of Acidthiobacillus ferrooxidans from which they were obtained (Giudici-Orticoni et al., Reference Giudici-Orticoni, Leroy, Nitschke and Bruschi2000). The cytochrome c4 of this bacterium in the absorption spectrum is characterized by a Soret peak at wavelength λ = 411 nm in the oxidized state and λ = 417 nm, λ = 523 nm and λ = 552 nm in the reduced state (Cavazza et al., Reference Cavazza, Giudici-Orticoni, Nitschke, Appia, Bonnefoy and Bruschi1996). Toxin–antitoxin (TA) systems, which work by inhibiting the activity of toxic substances, are also found within the genetic material of Aciditiobacillus ferrooxidans (Bustamante et al., Reference Bustamante, Tello and Orellana2014). There are three types of TA systems (I, II and III) and they occur in the genomes of almost all bacteria, playing an important role in their survival under stress conditions (Yamaguchi et al., Reference Yamaguchi, Park and Inouye2011). TA systems whose Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria may have a high content (28–29), e.g. type II, consist of pairs of genes responsible for toxin (stable) and antitoxin (unstable) coding (Bustamante et al., Reference Bustamante, Tello and Orellana2014). Studies (Bustamante et al., Reference Bustamante, Tello and Orellana2014) have shown that some of the chromosomally coded TA systems are part of the mobile genome of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. The ‘genomic islands’ present in the genome of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, which increase their resistance to copper, may also contribute to the possible competitive advantage of these microorganisms (Orellana and Jerez, Reference Orellana and Jerez2011). Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans have two glutamyl-tRNA synthetases that can indirectly regulate haem (Valdés et al., Reference Valdés, Pedroso, Quatrini, Dodson, Tettelin, Blake, Eisen and Holmes2008). Oxidative functions in the genome of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans are controlled by the petI and rus operons (Valdés et al., Reference Valdés, Pedroso, Quatrini, Dodson, Tettelin, Blake, Eisen and Holmes2008). In two different strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, ATCC 33020 and ATCC 23270, rus operons are organized in a similar manner (Quatrini et al., Reference Quatrini, Appia-Ayme, Denis, Jedlicki, Holmes and Bonnefoy2009).

Due to their genetic properties, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria can be an important component of the ecosystem formed in terrestrial volcanic sediments, as are Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria representing the NFP31 strain (Kato et al., Reference Kato, Guo, Fujimura, Nakamura, Nishizawa, Kurusu and Ohta2022). The presence of genes in the genome of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria, as in the case of one of its strains YNTRS-40, is involved in the oxidation of both sulphur and iron and related to the process of adaptation to the environment, and also determines the good growth of these bacteria in an environment containing heavy metals and with a very low pH. These genes also allow bacteria to bio-extract metals and remove sulphur from gases (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Zhang, Zhao, Ni, Wang and Yan2019b). Genetic modification, through genetic engineering, of the bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans can contribute to the enhancement of the bioleaching process in order to recover more metals (Jung et al., Reference Jung, Inaba, Jiang, West and Banta2022). Perhaps genome-altering processes in microorganisms potentially existing in Venus clouds, which may be possible analogues of the Earth's Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, with similar effects to genetically engineered ones, would allow said organisms to adapt to the extreme conditions in the lower layers of Venus' clouds and to possibly survive there to this day.

Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans as possible analogues to microorganisms that potentially live in the lower part of the clouds of Venus

Conditions on Venus

Venus is one of the more geologically rugged planets of the solar system that has a very similar radius and mass to Earth (Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Svedhem and Head2018). The atmosphere of this planet consists mainly of carbon dioxide (CO2) – 96% and nitrogen (N2) – 3.5%. It also contains carbon monoxide (CO) – 0.004%, noble gases: argon – 0.007% and neon – 0.0005%, sulphur dioxide (SO2) – 150 ppm, water vapour – 30 ppm, carbonyl sulphide (carbon oxysulphide) – 4 ppm and some traces of hydrogen chloride – 0.5 ppm, hydrogen fluoride – 0.005 ppm, hydroxyl and atomic oxygen and hydrogen (Taylor et al., Reference Taylor, Svedhem and Head2018). In the lower part of the clouds on Venus, around 47.5–50.5 km from the surface, very different conditions are observed. The pressure is approximately 1 atm (~1 bar), and the average temperature is around 60°C (Limaye et al., Reference Limaye, Mogul, Smith, Ansari, Słowik and Vaishampayan2018). In Venusian clouds there is also aerosolized hydrated sulphuric acid with a concentration in the range of 75–98%, increasing with the height of the clouds from a level of 48–65 km above the surface of Venus. The particles of this aerosol are characterized by different diameters in the range of three compartments (modes): 0.4–0.6 μm (mode 1), 2–2.8 μm (modes 2 and 2′), and 7.3–8 μm (mode 3). A small number of relatively large particles with a diameter of about 35 μm are also observed (Limaye et al., Reference Limaye, Mogul, Smith, Ansari, Słowik and Vaishampayan2018). In the sulphuric acid aerosol in the lower part of the Venusian clouds, there are about 50 particles cm−3 with an approximate diameter in the range of 2–8 μm and about 600 particles cm−3 with an approximate diameter of 0.4 μm. Taking into account the environmental conditions of the planet Venus, in particular the presence of sulphuric acid in the aerosol and the associated acidity in the lower cloud layer, and the fact that Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans are characterized by tolerance to the extremely acidic conditions prevailing on Earth, it can be assumed that the atmosphere of Venus is relatively adaptable to these organisms. Additionally, the fact that Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans thrives at pH as low as 1.3 suggests that it could potentially survive and even metabolize inorganic sulphur compounds found in Venus' clouds (Quatrini and Johnson, Reference Quatrini and Johnson2019). Moreover, the average temperature in these cloud layers of around 60°C coincides well with the upper limits of the temperature range that some strains of this bacterium can withstand (Limaye et al., Reference Limaye, Mogul, Smith, Ansari, Słowik and Vaishampayan2018), further supporting the hypothesis that such extremophiles could possibly adapt to the harsh environments (Table 4).

Table 4. Characteristics of the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria and comparative analysis with Venus's lower cloud layer conditions

The unknown electromagnetic radiation absorber in the UV range existing in the clouds of Venus

The electromagnetic radiation spectrum of Venus has revealed the discovery of an enigmatic ultraviolet (UV) absorber within the 330–400 nm wavelength range. This absorber presents a puzzling characteristic that thus far eludes comprehension. Of particular interest is the fact that this range aligns with the absorbance bandwidths of chlorophyll a and b, suggesting a possible correlation between this unidentified absorber and photosynthetic pigments. The presence of the UV absorber has been further confirmed through the emergence of obscure stripes that undergo contortion and morphing in a brief period of time (12 min), as observed in the UV-filtered Venus image (Limaye et al., Reference Limaye, Mogul, Smith, Ansari, Słowik and Vaishampayan2018). Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans are characterized by a similar UV spectrum to that recorded for Venus. The mentioned similarity of UV spectra suggests that the unknown absorber existing in Venus clouds may be of microbial origin, and its earth analogues may be Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. It is highly probable that due to their metabolism and physicochemical properties, these bacteria would be able to survive in the conditions of the lower part of Venusian clouds. The latest research confirms the existence of extremophilic bacteria which were found on Earth at an altitude of 41 km, which corresponds to the altitude of the lower part of Venusian clouds (Limaye et al., Reference Limaye, Mogul, Smith, Ansari, Słowik and Vaishampayan2018).

Conclusions and future studies

The hypothesis of microbiological life in the clouds of Venus is further strengthened by numerical models describing the evolution of the climate of the second planet from the Sun (Way et al., Reference Way, Del Genio, Kiang, Sohl, Grinspoon, Aleinov, Kelley and Clune2016; Way and Del Genio, Reference Way and Del Genio2020), which could have been characterized by a climate that was inhabited in the past for over 700 million years (Way et al., Reference Way, Del Genio, Kiang, Sohl, Grinspoon, Aleinov, Kelley and Clune2016). On the young Venus, it is probable that there was an ocean with warm waters (Grinspoon and Bullock, Reference Grinspoon, Bullock, Esposito, Stafan and Cravens2007), in which primordial ocean life could potentially have arisen. The climate changes that have occurred on Venus could have caused its ocean to evaporate, and the microorganisms potentially present there, with various transport mechanisms, could have penetrated and inhabited the clouds of Venus (Limaye et al., Reference Limaye, Mogul, Smith, Ansari, Słowik and Vaishampayan2018). However, according to some researchers, Venusian clouds may have a limited potential for life, which is conditioned by the availability of one of the microelements, molybdenum, which plays a vital role in various biological processes, including nitrogen fixation and electron transfer reactions (Lingam and Loeb, Reference Lingam and Loeb2018). The protein that participates in the transport of this element is molybdopterin (Dekker et al., Reference Dekker, Arsène-Ploetze and Santini2016). It has been shown that Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans are able to generate energy in the process of chemolithoautotrophic metabolism using iron contained in a meteorite (González-Toril et al., Reference González-Toril, Martínez-Frías, Gómez, Rull and Amils2005). In this regard, it can be assumed that these bacteria could have the potential to act as carriers of life, traversing the universe within iron meteoroids, fuelled by the energy provided by the iron contained in meteorites, which facilitates their engagement in chemolithoautotrophic metabolism. This confirms that Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidansis an important model organism in the context of the development of astrobiological research (Quatrini and Johnson, Reference Quatrini and Johnson2019), and as a pioneering species it can contribute to the exploration of the habitability of Venus. Therefore, it is important to laboratory test the strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans mentioned in this paper in order to find such a strain or to produce it through genetic engineering or artificial selection, so that the bacteria representing it would have such features that would allow them to survive in the environmental conditions of the lower layer of Venus clouds. This applies to the search for the closest possible analogue of terrestrial microorganisms potentially living in the clouds of Venus. Finding ways to effectively research the habitability of Venus, perhaps with the active participation of terrestrial bacteria (genetically modified or specially selected for this purpose) such as Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, is inextricably linked with stopping and then reversing the Venus greenhouse effect, which is a phenomenon wherein the high concentration of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere traps heat, causing a runaway greenhouse effect and resulting in surface temperatures that can exceed 450°C. Among other things, in this context, Venus can act as a kind of laboratory (Kane et al., Reference Kane, Arney, Crisp, Domagal-Goldman, Glaze, Goldblatt, Grinspoon, Head, Lenardic, Unterborn, Way and Zahnle2019) to understand the mechanisms by which the planet, most likely having had water on its surface in the past for a very long time (around 2 billion years) (Way et al., Reference Way, Del Genio, Kiang, Sohl, Grinspoon, Aleinov, Kelley and Clune2016), transformed to the state we are seeing today.

The answers to many questions about Venus' atmosphere can be provided by future research missions on Venus, which are already approved for implementation (O'Callaghan, Reference O'Callaghan2021), and which – among other valuable scientific results – may also find the first extraterrestrial life.

Conflict of interest

No competing financial interests exist for any of the authors.

References

Abergel, C, Nitschke, W, Malarte, G, Bruschi, M, Claverie, J-M and Giudici-Orticoni, M-T (2003) The structure of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans c4-cytochrome: a model for complex-induced electron. Transfer tuning. Structure 11, 547555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abhilash, SS, Mehta, KD, Kumar, V, Pandey, BD and Pandey, VM (2009) Dissolution of uranium from silicate-apatite ore by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy 95, 7075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Africa, C-J, van Hille, RP and Harrison, STL (2013) Attachment of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Leptospirillum ferriphilum cultured under varying conditions to pyrite, chalcopyrite, low-grade ore and quartz in a packed column reactor. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 97, 13171324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ageeva, SN, Kondrateva, TF and Karavaiko, GI (2001) Phenotypic characteristics of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans strains. Microbiology 70, 186194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ageeva, SN, Kondrat'eva, TF and Karavaiko, GI (2003) Plasmid profiles of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans strains adapted to different oxidation substrates. Microbiology 72, 579584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ai, C, Liang, Y, Miao, B, Chen, M, Zeng, W and Qiu, G (2018) Identification and analysis of a novel gene cluster involves in Fe2+ oxidation in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 23270, a typical biomining acidophile. Current Microbiology 75, 818826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amoozegar, MA, Siroosi, M, Atashgahi, S, Smidt, H and Ventosa, A (2017) Systematics of haloarchaea and biotechnological potential of their hydrolytic enzymes. Microbiology 163, 623645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Appia-Ayme, C, Guiliani, N, Ratouchniak, J and Bonnefoy, V (1999) Characterization of an operon encoding two c-type cytochromes, an aa3-type cytochrome oxidase, and rusticyanin in Thiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 33020. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 47814787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, M and Ingledew, WJ (1989) The reductive reactions of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans on sulphur and selenium. FEMS Microbiology Letters 58, 189194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillet, F, Magnin, JP, Cheruy, A and Ozil, P (1998) Chromium precipitation by the acidophilic bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Biotechnology Letters 20, 9599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldi, F, Clark, T, Pollack, SS and Olson, GJ (1992) Leaching of pyrites of various reactivities by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58, 18531856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, ML, Harvey, I, Sundararajan, M, Surendran, R, Hall, JF, Ellis, MJ, Hough, MA, Strange, RW, Hillier, IH and Hasnain, SS (2006) Atomic resolution crystal structures, EXAFS, and quantum chemical studies of rusticyanin and its two mutants provide insight into its unusual properties. Biochemistry 45, 29272939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barron, JL and Lueking, DR (1990) Growth and maintenance of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans cells. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 56, 28012806.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsoukov, E (2018) Impedance Spectroscopy: Theory, Experiment, and Applications. John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119381860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayat, O, Sever, E, Bayat, B, Arslan, V and Poole, C (2009) Bioleaching of zinc and iron from steel plant waste using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 152, 117126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Belyi, AV, Pustoshilov, PP, Gurevich, YL, Kadochnikova, GG and Ladygina, VP (2006) Bacterial leaching of manganese ores. Applied Biochemistry and Microbiology 42, 289292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bendia, AG, Araujo, GG, Pulschen, AA, Contro, B, Duarte, RT, Rodrigues, F, Galante, D and Pellizari, VH (2018) Surviving in hot and cold: psychrophiles and thermophiles from Deception Island volcano, Antarctica. Extremophiles 22, 917929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berthelot, D, Leduc, LG and Ferroni, GD (1993) Temperature studies of iron-oxidizing autotrophs and acidophilic heterotrophs isolated from uranium mines. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 39, 384388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevilaqua, D, Leite, ALLC, Garcia, O and Tuovinen, OH (2002) Oxidation of chalcopyrite by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans in shake flasks. Process Biochemistry 38, 587592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevilaqua, D, Acciari, HA, Arena, FA, Benedetti, AV, Fugivara, CS, Tremiliosi Filho, G and Júnior, OG (2009) Utilization of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for monitoring bornite (Cu5FeS4) oxidation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Minerals Engineering 22, 254262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevilaqua, D, Garcia, O and Tuovinen, OH (2010) Oxidative dissolution of bornite by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Process Biochemistry 45, 101106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatti, TM, Bigham, JM, Carlson, L and Tuovinen, OH (1993) Mineral products of pyrrhotite oxidation by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 59, 19841990.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blake, RC and Shute, EA (1987) Respiratory enzymes of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. A kinetic study of electron transfer between iron and rusticyanin in sulfate media. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 262, 14983–14969.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bracher, A, Whitney, SM, Hartl, FU and Hayer-Hartl, M (2017) Biogenesis and metabolic maintenance of Rubisco. Annual Review of Plant Biology 68, 2960.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braddock, JF, Luong, HV and Brown, EJ (1984) Growth kinetics of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans isolated from arsenic mine drainage. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 48, 4855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brahmaprakash, GP, Devasia, P, Jagadish, KS, Natarajan, KA and Rao, GR (1988) Development of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 19859 strains tolerant to copper and zinc. Bulletin of Materials Science 10, 461465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brasseur, G, Levican, G, Bonnefoy, V, Holmes, D, Jedlicki, E and Lemesle-Meunier, D (2004) Apparent redundancy of electron transfer pathways via bc1 complexes and terminal oxidases in the extremophilic chemolithoautotrophic Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) – Bioenergetics 1656, 114126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bustamante, P, Covarrubias, PC, Levicán, G, Katz, A, Tapia, P, Holmes, D, Quatrini, R and Orellana, O (2012) ICEAfe1, an actively excising genetic element from the biomining bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology 22, 399407.Google ScholarPubMed
Bustamante, P, Tello, M and Orellana, O (2014) Toxin-antitoxin systems in the mobile genome of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. PLoS One 9, e112226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campodonico, MA, Vaisman, D, Castro, JF, Razmilic, V, Mercado, F, Andrews, BA, Feist, AM and Asenjo, JA (2016) Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans's comprehensive model driven analysis of the electron transfer metabolism and synthetic strain design for biomining applications. Metabolic Engineering Communications 3, 8496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castelle, C, Guiral, M, Malarte, G, Ledgham, F, Leroy, G, Brugna, M and Giudici-Orticoni, M-T (2008) A new iron-oxidizing/O2-reducing supercomplex spanning both inner and outer membranes, isolated from the extreme acidophile Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 283, 2580325811.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cavazza, C, Giudici-Orticoni, MT, Nitschke, W, Appia, C, Bonnefoy, V and Bruschi, M (1996) Characterisation of a soluble cytochrome c4 isolated from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. European Journal of Biochemistry 242, 308314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ceskova, P, Mandl, M, Helanova, S and Kasparovska, J (2002) Kinetic studies on elemental sulfur oxidation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans: sulfur limitation and activity of free and adsorbed bacteria. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 78, 2430.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, P, Yan, L, Leng, F, Nan, W, Yue, X, Zheng, Y, Feng, N and Li, H (2011) Bioleaching of realgar by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans using ferrous iron and elemental sulfur as the sole and mixed energy sources. Bioresource Technology 102, 32603267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, P, Yan, L, Wang, Q, Li, Y and Li, H (2012) Surface alteration of realgar (As(4)S(4)) by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. International Journal of Microbiology 15, 915.Google Scholar
Chen, P, Yan, L, Wu, Z, Xu, R, Li, S, Wang, N, Liang, N and Li, H (2015) Draft genome sequence of extremely acidophilic bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans DLC-5 isolated from acid mine drainage in Northeast China. Genomics Data 6, 267268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choi, N-C, Cho, KH, Kim, BJ, Lee, S and Park, CY (2018) Enhancement of Au-Ag-Te contents in tellurium-bearing ore minerals via bioleaching. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy, and Materials 25, 262270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, JA (2019) Recent advances in understanding extremophiles. F1000Research 8, 36.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collinet, M-N and Morin, D (1990) Characterization of arsenopyrite oxidizing Thiobacillus. Tolerance to arsenite, arsenate, ferrous and ferric iron. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 57, 237244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colmer, AR and Hinkle, ME (1947) The role of microorganisms in acid mine drainage: a preliminary report. Science 106, 253256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colmer, AR, Temple, KL and Hinkle, ME (1950) An iron-oxidizing bacterium from the acid drainage of some bituminous coal mines. Journal of bacteriology 59(3), 317328.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corradini, S, Montopoli, M, Guerrieri, L, Ricci, M, Scollo, S, Merucci, L, Marzano, FS, Pugnaghi, S, Prestifilippo, M, Ventress, LJ, Grainger, RG, Carboni, E, Vulpiani, G and Coltelli, M (2016) A multi-sensor approach for volcanic ash cloud retrieval and eruption characterization: the 23 November 2013 Etna Lava fountain. Remote Sensing 8, 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, A, Modak, JM and Natarajan, KA (1997) Studies on multi-metal ion tolerance of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Mineral Engineering 10, 743749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Das, A, Modak, JM and Natarajan, KA (1998) Surface chemical studies of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans with reference to copper tolerance. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73, 215222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dekker, L, Arsène-Ploetze, F and Santini, JM (2016) Comparative proteomics of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans grown in the presence and absence of uranium. Research in Microbiology 167, 234239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Devasia, P and Natarajan, KA (2010) Adhesion of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans to mineral surfaces. International Journal of Mineral Processing 4, 135139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djebli, A, Proctor, P, Blake, RC II and Shoham, M (1992) Crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic studies of rusticyanin from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Journal of Molecular Biology 227, 581582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donati, E, Curutchet, G, Pogliani, C and Tedesco, P (1996) Bioleaching of covellite using pure and mixed cultures of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and Thiobacillus thiooxidans. Process Biochemistry 31, 129134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, DW, Landesman, J and Walden, CC (1967) Role of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans in the oxidation of sulfide minerals. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 13, 397403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Escobar, B and Godoy, I (2002) Enumeration of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans adhered to agglomerated ores in bioleaching processes. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 18, 875879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esparza, M, Cárdenas, JP, Bowien, B, Jedlicki, E and Holmes, DS (2010) Genes and pathways for CO2 fixation in the obligate, chemolithoautotrophic acidophile, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, carbon fixation in A. ferrooxidans. BMC Microbiology 10, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espejo, RT and Romero, P (1987) Growth of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans on elemental sulfur. Applied and Environment Microbiology 53, 19071912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feng, S, Xin, Y, Yang, H, Zhang, L, Kang, W, Xia, X and Wang, W (2012) A novel and efficient assay for identification and quantification of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in bioleaching samples. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 39, 11611168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feng, S, Hailin, H and Wang, W (2015) Improved chalcopyrite bioleaching by Acidithiobacillus sp. via direct step-wise regulation of microbial community structure. Bioresource Technology 192, 7582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferris, A, Abers, GA, Zelt, B, Taylor, B and Roecker, S (2006) Crustal structure across the transition from rifting to spreading: the Woodlark rift system of Papua New Guinea. Geophysical Journal International 166, 622634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, TA and Crundwell, FK (1999) Leaching of zinc sulfide by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans: bacterial oxidation of the sulfur product layer increases the rate of zinc sulfide dissolution at high concentrations of ferrous ions. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 65, 52855292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gale, NL and Beck, JV (1967) Evidence for the Calvin cycle and hexose monophosphate pathway in Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Journal of Bacteriology 94, 10521059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallo, G, Puopolo, R, Carbonaro, M, Maresca, E and Fiorentino, G (2021) Extremophiles, a nifty tool to face environmental pollution: from exploitation of metabolism to genome engineering. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 5228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garcia, O Jr., Bigham, JM and Tuovinen, OH (1995) Oxidation of galena by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and Thiobacillus thiooxidans. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 41: 508514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehrke, T, Hallmann, R, Kinzler, K and Sand, W (2001) The EPS of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans – a model for structure-function relationships of attached bacteria and their physiology. Water Science and Technology 43, 159167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gholami, RM, Borghei, SM and Mousavi, SM (2011) Bacterial leaching of a spent Mo–Co–Ni refinery catalyst using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans. Hydrometallurgy 106, 2631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giudici-Orticoni, MT, Leroy, G, Nitschke, W and Bruschi, M (2000) Characterization of a new Dihemicc 4-type cytochrome isolated from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Biochemistry 39, 72057211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González-Toril, E, Martínez-Frías, J, Gómez, JM, Rull, F and Amils, R (2005) Iron meteorites can support the growth of acidophilic chemolithoautotrophic microorganisms. Astrobiology 5, 406414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grinspoon, DH and Bullock, MA (2007) Astrobiology and Venus exploration. In Esposito, LW, Stafan, ER and Cravens, TE (eds), Exploring Venus as a Terrestrial Planet. Washington: AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts, pp. 191206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haghshenas, DF, Alamdari, EK, Torkmahalleh, MA, Bonakdarpour, B and Nasernejad, B (2009) Adaptation of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans to high grade sphalerite concentrate. Minerals Engineering 22, 12991306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halfmeier, H, Schiifer-Treffenfeldt, W and Reuss, M (1993) Potential of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans for waste gas purification. Part 1. Kinetics of continuous ferrous iron oxidation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 40, 416420.Google Scholar
Harneit, K, Göksel, A, Kock, D, Klock, J-H, Gehrke, T and Sand, W (2006) Adhesion to metalsulfide surfaces by cells of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and Leptospirillum ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy 83, 245254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, PI and Crundwell, FK (1997) Growth of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans: a novel experimental design for batch growth and bacterial leaching studies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 63, 25862592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazra, TK (1992) Role of rusticyanin in the electron transport process in Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Indian Journal of Biochemistry & Biophysics 29, 7781.Google ScholarPubMed
Holmes, DS, Zhao, HL, Levican, G, Ratouchniak, J, Bonnefoy, V, Valera, P and Jedlicki, E (2001) ISAfe1, an ISL3 family insertion sequence from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 19859. Journal of Bacteriology 183, 43234329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horikoshi, K, Antranikian, G, Bull, AT, Robb, FT and Stetter, KO (2010) Extremophiles Handbook. Tokyo, Japan: Springer Science & Business Media, p. 4.Google Scholar
Jafari, M, Shafaei, SZA, Abdollahi, H, Gharabaghi, M, Chelgani, Chehreh S (2016) A comparative study on the effect of flotation Reagents on Growth and Iron Oxidation Activities of Leptospirillum ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. 7.Google Scholar
Janiczek, O, Mandl, M and Ceskova, P (1998) Metabolic activity of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans on reduced sulfur compounds detected by capillary isotachophoresis. Journal of Biotechnology 61, 225229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, DB (2007) Physiology and ecology of acidophilic microorganism. In Gerday, C and Glansdorff, N (eds), Physiology and Biochemistry of Extremophiles. Washington: American Society for Microbiology, pp. 429.Google Scholar
Jung, H, Inaba, Y, Jiang, V, West, AC and Banta, S (2022) Engineering polyhistidine tags on surface proteins of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans: impact of localization on the binding and recovery of divalent metal cations. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 14, 1012510133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaewkannetra, P, Garcia-Garcia, FJ and Chiu, TY (2009) Bioleaching of zinc from gold ores using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials 16, 368374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kai, M, Fukumori, Y and Yamanaka, T (1989) Cytochrome oxidase of an acidophilic iron-oxidizing bacterium, Thiobacillus ferrooxidans, functions at pH 3.5. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communication 160, 839843.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kane, SR, Arney, G, Crisp, D, Domagal-Goldman, S, Glaze, LS, Goldblatt, C, Grinspoon, D, Head, JW, Lenardic, A, Unterborn, C, Way, MJ and Zahnle, KJ (2019) Venus as a laboratory for exoplanetary science. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 124, 20152028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, T, Guo, Y, Fujimura, R, Nakamura, T, Nishizawa, T, Kurusu, Y and Ohta, H (2022) Complete genome sequence of a chemolithoautotrophic iron oxidizing bacterium, Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans Strain NFP31, isolated from volcanic ash deposits on Miyake-Jima, Japan. Microbiology Resource Announcements 11, e01006–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kawabe, Y, Inoue, C, Suto, K and Chida, T (2003) Inhibitory effect of high concentrations of ferric ions on the activity of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering 96, 375379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, DP and Wood, AP (2000) Reclassification of some species of Thiobacillus to the newly designated genera Acidithiobacillus gen. nov., Halothiobacillus gen. nov. and Thermithiobacillus gen. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 50, 511516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ko, MS, Park, HS, Kim, KW and Lee, JU (2013) The role of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans in arsenic bioleaching from soil. Environmental Geochemistry and Health 35, 727733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kocaman, AT, Cemek, M and Edwards, KJ (2016) Kinetics of pyrite, pyrrhotite, and chalcopyrite dissolution by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 62, 629642.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondrat'eva, TF, Ageeva, SN, Muntyan, LN, Pivovarova, TA and Karavaiko, GI (2002) Strain polymorphism of the plasmid profiles in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Microbiology 71, 319325.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kondratyeva, TF, Muntyan, LN and Karavaiko, G (1995) Zinc- and arsenic-resistant strains of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans have increased copy numbers of chromosomal resistance genes. Microbiology 141, 11571162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Konishi, Y, Takasaka, Y and Asai, S (1994) Kinetics of growth and elemental sulfur oxidation in batch culture of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 44, 667673.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kucera, J, Pakostova, E, Lochman, J, Janiczek, O and Mandl, M (2016) Are there multiple mechanisms of anaerobic sulfur oxidation with ferric iron in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans? Research in Microbiology 167, 357366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latorre, M, Ehrenfeld, N, Cortés, MP, Travisany, D, Budinich, M, Aravena, A, Maass, (2016) Global transcriptional responses of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans Wenelen under different sulfide minerals. Bioresource Technology, 200, 2934.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leduc, LG, Ferroni, GD and Trevors, JT (1997) Resistance to heavy metals in different strains of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 13, 453455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, N and Xie, H (2012) Bioleaching of low grade tellurium sulfide mineral. Energy Procedia 16, 946951.Google Scholar
Leng, F, Li, K, Zhang, X, Li, Y, Zhu, Y, Lu, J and Li, H (2009) Comparative study of inorganic arsenic resistance of several strains of Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy 98, 235240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, TF, Painter, RG, Ban, B and Blake, RC (2015) The multicenter aerobic iron respiratory chain of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans functions as an ensemble with a single macroscopic rate constant. Journal of Biological Chemistry 290, 1829318303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Limaye, SS, Mogul, R, Smith, DJ, Ansari, AH, Słowik, GP and Vaishampayan, P (2018) Venus’ spectral signatures and the potential for life in the clouds. Astrobiology 18, 11811198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, R, Liu, J, Shan, S, Zhang, Y and Yang, Y (2024) Significant differences in the degree of genomic DNA N6-methyladenine modifications in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans with two different culture substrates. PLoS One 19, e0298204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lingam, M and Loeb, A (2018) Is extraterrestrial life suppressed on subsurface ocean worlds due to the paucity of bioessential elements? The Astronomical Journal 156, 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, H, Xia, J and Nie, Z (2015) Relatedness of Cu and Fe speciation to chalcopyrite bioleaching by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy 156, 4046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lorenz, RD (2016) Surface winds on Venus: probability distribution from in-situ measurements. Icarus 264, 311315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makita, M, Esperón, M, Pereyra, B, López, A and Orrantia, E (2004) Reduction of arsenic content in a complex galena concentrate by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. BMC Biotechnology 4, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, LJ and Rice, NM (2002) The adaptation of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans for the treatment of nickel-iron sulphide concentrates. Minerals Engineering 15, 795808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mejía, ER, Ospina, JD, Márquez, MA and Morales, AL (2009) Oxidation of chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and a mixed culture of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans like bacterium in shake flasks. Advanced Materials Research 71–73, 385388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Natarajan, KA, Sudeesha, K and Rao, GR (1994) Stability of copper tolerance in Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 66, 303306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nemati, N, Harrison, STL, Hansford, GS and Webb, C (1998) Biological oxidation of ferrous sulphate by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans: a review on the kinetic aspects. Biochemical Engineering Journal 1, 171190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nestor, D, Valdivia, U and Chaves, AP (2001) Mechanisms of bioleaching of a refractory mineral of gold with Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. International Journal of Mineral Processing 62, 187198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nieto, PA, Covarrubias, PC, Jedlicki, E, Holmes, DS and Quatrini, R (2009) Selection and evaluation of reference genes for improved interrogation of microbial transcriptomes: case study with the extremophile Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. BMC Molecular Biology 10, 63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nike, AR, Baba, AA, Al-Hasan, S, Bosede, AF and Kamoldeen, AA (2012) Bioleaching of lead from Nigerian anglesite ore by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 8, 55915598.Google Scholar
Novo, TM, da Silva, AC, Moreto, R, Cabral, PCP, Costacurta, A, Garcia, O Jr. and Ottobon, LMM (2000) Thiobacillus ferrooxidans response to copper and other heavy metals: growth, protein synthesis and protein phosphorylation. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 77, 187195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Callaghan, J (2021) How three missions to Venus could solve the planet's biggest mysteries. Nature 594, 486487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ohmura, N, Sasaki, K, Matsumoto, N and Saiki, H (2002) Anaerobic respiration using Fe3+, S0, and H2 in the chemolithoautotrophic bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Journal of Bacteriology 184, 20812087.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, GJ and Clark, TR (2008) Bioleaching of molybdenite. Hydrometallurgy 93, 1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oppon, JC, Sarnovsky, RJ, Craig, NL and Rawlings, DE (1998) A Tn7-like transposon is present in the glmUS region of the obligately chemoautolithotrophic bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Journal of Bacteriology 180, 30073012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orellana, LH and Jerez, CA (2011) A genomic island provides Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 53993 additional copper resistance: a possible competitive advantage. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 92, 761767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osorio, H, Mangold, S, Denis, Y, Ñancucheo, I, Esparza, M, Johnson, DB, Bonnefoy, V, Dopson, M and Holmes, DS (2003) Anaerobic sulfur metabolism coupled to dissimilatory iron reduction in the extremophile Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 79, 21722181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakostova, E, Mandl, M, Pokorna, BO, Diviskova, E and Lojek, A (2013 a) Cellular ATP changes in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans cultures oxidizing ferrous iron and elemental sulfur. Geomicrobiology Journal 30, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pakostova, E, Mandl, M and Tuovinen, OH (2013 b) Cellular ATP and biomass of attached and planktonic sulfur-oxidizing Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Process Biochemistry 48, 17851788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J, Han, Y, Lee, E, Choi, U, Yoo, K, Song, Y and Kim, H (2014) Bioleaching of highly concentrated arsenic mine tailings by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Separation and Purification Technology 133, 291296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponce, JS, Moinier, D, Byrne, D, Amouric, A and Bonnefoy, V (2012) Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans oxidizes ferrous iron before sulfur likely through transcriptional regulation by the global redox responding RegBA signal transducing system. Hydrometallurgy 127, 187194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Priya, A and Hait, S (2020) Biometallurgical recovery of metals from waste printed circuit boards using pure and mixed strains of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidiphilium acidophilum. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 143, 262272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pronk, JT, Meijer, WM, Hazeu, W, van Dijken, JP, Bos, P and Kuenen, JG (1991) Growth of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans on formic acid. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 57, 20572062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pronk, JT, Bruyn, JC, Bos, P and Kuenen, JG (1992) Anaerobic growth of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 58, 22272230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quatrini, R and Johnson, DB (2019) Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Trends in Microbiology 27, 282283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quatrini, R, Appia-Ayme, C, Denis, Y, Jedlicki, E, Holmes, DS and Bonnefoy, V (2009) Extending the models for iron and sulfur oxidation in the extreme acidophile Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. BMC Genomics 10, 394.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramos-Zúñiga, J, Gallardoa, S, Martínez-Bussenius, C, Norambuena, R, Navarroo, CA, Paradela, A and Jereza, CA (2019) Response of the biomining Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans to high cadmium concentrations. Journal of Proteomics 198, 132144.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rampelotto, PH (2013) Extremophiles and extreme environments. Life 3, 482485.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rashidi, A, Safdari, J, Roosta-Azad, R and Zokaei-Kadijani, S (2012) Modeling of uranium bioleaching by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Annals of Nuclear Energy 43, 1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawlings, DE (2005) The evolution of pTF-FC2 and pTC-F14, two related plasmids of the IncQ-family. Plasmid 53, 137147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rojas-Chapana, JA and Tributsch, H (2001) Biochemistry of sulfur extraction in bio-corrosion of pyrite by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy 59, 291300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronk, M, Shively, JE, Shute, EA and Blake, RC (1991) Amino acid sequence of the blue copper protein rusticyanin from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Biochemistry 30, 94359442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salwan, R and Sharma, V (eds) (2020) Physiological and Biotechnological Aspects of Extremophiles. Singapore: Academic Press, Elsevier, p. 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, MI and Blake, RC (1999) The cell attachment and oxygen consumption of two strains of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Minerals Engineering 12, 671686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleper, C, Pühler, G, Klenk, HP and Zillig, W (1996) Picrophilusoshimae and Picrophilustorridus fam. nov., gen. nov., sp. nov., two species of hyperacidophilic, thermophilic, heterotrophic, aerobic archaea. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology 46, 814816.Google Scholar
Schuler, ML and Tsuchiya, HM (1975) Determination of cell numbers and cell size for Thiobacillus ferrooxidans by the electrical resistance method. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 17, 621624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverman, MP and Lundgren, DG (1959) Studies on the chemoautotrophic iron bacterium Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. I. An improved medium and a harvesting procedure for securing high cell yields. Journal of Bacteriology 77, 642647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soo, KI, Jang, HY and Lee, J-U (2002) Kinetics of Fe2+ oxidation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans using total organic carbon measurement. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 12, 268272.Google Scholar
Su-lin, LL, Pettersson, OV, Rice, T, Hocking, AD and Schnürer, J (2011) The extreme xerophilic mould Xeromyces bisporus – Growth and competition at various water activities. International Journal of Food Microbiology 145, 5763.Google Scholar
Sugio, T, Fujii, M, Takeuchi, F, Negishi, A, Maeda, T and Kamimura, K (2003) Volatilization of mercury by an iron oxidation enzyme system in a highly mercury-resistant Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans Strain MON-1. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 67, 15371544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunny, JS, Natarajan, A, Nisha, K and Saleena, LM (2021) Compost samples from different temperature zones as a model to study co-occurrence of thermophilic and psychrophilic bacterial population: a metagenomics approach. Current Microbiology 78, 19031913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, S and Chen, M (2012) Early stage adsorption behaviour of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans on minerals I: an experimental approach. Hydrometallurgy 119, 8794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, FW, Svedhem, H and Head, JW (2018) Venus: the atmosphere, climate, surface, interior and near-space environment of an earth-like planet. Space Science Reviews 214, 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurston, RS, Mandernack, KW and Shanks, WC (2010) Laboratory chalcopyrite oxidation by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans: oxygen and sulfur isotope fractionation. Chemical Geology 269, 252261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torma, AE (1977) The role of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans in hydrometallurgical processes. In Ghose, TK, Fiechter, A and Blakebrough, N (eds), Advances in Biochemical Engineering, vol. 6. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 137.Google Scholar
Torma, AE, Gabra, GG, Guay, R and Silver, M (1976) Effects of surface active agents on the oxidation of chalcopyrite by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy 1, 301309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, JH and Dugan, PR (1976) Inhibition of growth, iron, and sulfur oxidation in Thiobacillus ferrooxidans by simple organic compounds. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 22, 719730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valdés, J, Pedroso, I, Quatrini, R, Dodson, RJ, Tettelin, H, Blake, R, Eisen, JA and Holmes, DS (2008) Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans metabolism: from genome sequence to industrial applications. BMC Genomics 9, 597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valkova-Valchanova, MB and Chan, SHP (1994) Purification and characterization of two new c-type cytochromes involved in Fe2+ oxidation from Thiobacillus ferrooxidans. FEMS Microbiology Letters 121, 6170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vera, M, Pagliai, F, Guiliani, N and Jerez, CA (2008) The chemolithoautotroph Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans can survive under phosphate-limiting conditions by expressing a C-P lyase operon that allows it to grow on phosphonates. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 74, 18291835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J, Bai, J, Xu, J and Liang, B (2009) Bioleaching of metals from printed wire boards by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and Acidithiobacillus thiooxidans and their mixture. Journal of Hazardous Materials 172, 11001105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Q, Long, H, Wang, H and Lau Vetter, MC (2024) Characterize the growth and metabolism of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans under electroautotrophic and chemoautotrophic conditions. Microorganisms 12, 590590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Way, MJ and Del Genio, AD (2020) Venusian habitable climate scenarios: modeling Venus through time and applications to slowly rotating Venus-like exoplanets. Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets 125, e2019JE006276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, MJ, Del Genio, AD, Kiang, NY, Sohl, LE, Grinspoon, DH, Aleinov, I, Kelley, M and Clune, T (2016) Was Venus the first habitable world of our solar system? Geophysical Research Letters 43, 83768383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, R, Peng, S, Wang, J, Wu, Z, Yan, L, Zhao, W, Liu, Y, Ma, W, Latta, M, Li, H and Chen, P (2019) Bioleaching of realgar nanoparticles using the extremophilic bacterium Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans DLC-5. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 38, 4957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamaguchi, Y, Park, J-H and Inouye, M (2011) Toxin-antitoxin systems in bacteria and archaea. Annual Review of Genetics 45, 6179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamanaka, T (2008) Chemolithoautotrophic Bacteria: Biochemistry and Environmental Biology. Tokyo, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, pp. 157.Google Scholar
Yan, L, Yin, H, Zhang, S, Duan, J, Li, Y, Chen, P and Li, H (2010) Organoarsenic resistance and bioremoval of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Bioresource Technology 101, 65726575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yan, L, Hu, H, Zhang, S, Chen, P, Wang, W and Li, H (2017) Arsenic tolerance and bioleaching from realgar based on response surface methodology by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans isolated from Wudalianchi volcanic lake, northeast China. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 25, 5057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, X, Zhang, X, Fan, Y and Li, H (2008) The leaching of pentlandite by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans with a biological-chemical process. Biochemical Engineering Journal 42, 166171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, T, Xu, Z, Wen, J and Yang, L (2009) Factors influencing bioleaching copper from waste printed circuit boards by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy 97, 2932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Y, Diao, M, Liu, K, Qian, L, Nguyen, AV and Qiu, G (2013) Column bioleaching of low-grade copper ore by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in pure and mixed cultures with a heterotrophic acidophile Acidiphilium sp. Hydrometallurgy 131, 9398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarzábal, A, Brasseur, G and Bonnefoy, V (2002 a) Cytochromes c of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. FEMS Microbiology Letters 209, 189195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yarzábal, A, Brasseur, G, Ratouchniak, J, Lund, K, Lemesle-Meunier, D, DeMoss, JA and Bonnefoy, V (2002 b) The high molecular weight cytochrome c Cyc2 of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is an outer membrane protein. Journal of Bacteriology 184, 13317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yarzábal, A, Duquesne, K and Bonnefoy, V (2003) Rusticyanin gene expression of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 33020 in sulfur- and in ferrous iron media. Hydrometallurgy 71, 107114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, R, Wei, D, Liu, W, Lu, T, Shen, Y and Cui, B (2015) Effect of polyethylene glycol on chalcopyrite bioleaching with Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans The Chinese Journal of Nonferrous Metals, 25, 20152021.Google Scholar
Zhang, R, Wei, D, Shen, Y, Liu, W, Lu, T and Han, C (2016) Catalytic effect of polyethylene glycol on sulfur oxidation in chalcopyrite bioleaching by Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Minerals Engineering 95, 7478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, R, Hedrich, S, Ostertag-Henning, C and Schippers, A (2018 a) Effect of elevated pressure on ferric iron reduction coupled to sulfur oxidation by biomining microorganisms. Hydrometallurgy 178, 215223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, R, Sun, C, Kou, J, Zhao, H, Wei, D and Xing, X (2018 b) Enhancing the leaching of chalcopyrite using Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans under the induction of surfactant triton X-100. Minerals 9, 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S, Yan, L, Xing, W, Chen, P, Zhang, Y and Wang, W (2018 c) Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans and its potential application. Extremophiles 22, 563579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, WJ, Cui, XH, Chen, LH, Yang, J, Li, XG, Zhang, C, Barbe, V, Mangenot, S, Fouteau, S, Guerin, T, Katog, C and Wu, LF (2019 a) Complete genome sequence of Shewanella benthica DB21MT-2, an obligate piezophilic bacterium isolated from the deepest Mariana Trench sediment. Marine Genomics 44, 5256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y, Zhang, S, Zhao, D, Ni, Y, Wang, W and Yan, L (2019 b) Complete genome sequence of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans YNTRS-40, a strain of the ferrous iron- and sulfur-oxidizing acidophile. Microorganisms 8, 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, X and Li, D (2016) Synergy between Rhizobium phaseoli and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans in the bioleaching process of copper. BioMed Research International 1–7, 9384767.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Classification of extremophilic organisms, taking into account their limit values for growth

Figure 1

Table 2. Strains of the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria

Figure 2

Figure 1. Micrograph of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (DSM 583) at 12 000× magnification.

Figure 3

Figure 2. Micrograph of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans (DSM 583) at 8000× magnification.

Figure 4

Table 3. Division of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria into strains via bacterial activity

Figure 5

Table 4. Characteristics of the Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans bacteria and comparative analysis with Venus's lower cloud layer conditions