Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:01:19.787Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Communication with aliens, as an opening of the horizon of a scientific Humanity. A philosopher's reflections

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2013

J.-L. Petit*
Affiliation:
Faculté de Philosophie, Université de Strasbourg, 7, rue de l'Université, 67000 Strasbourg, France Laboratoire de Physiologie de la Perception et de l'Action, Collège de France, 11, Place Marcelin Berthelot, 75005 Paris, France e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In this article, we reflect on the motives underlying the search for extraterrestrial intelligent life (SETI) with a view to show that far from turning away from humanity it is profoundly rooted in human aspirations. We suggest that those motives derive their driving force from the fact that they combine two powerful aspirations of humanity. On the one hand, there is the transcendental motive that drives history of science, the human enterprise that claims to escape any communitarian closure of horizon and brings our humanity to transcend itself toward the other, which was formerly referred to under the title Universal Reason. On the other hand, there is the anthropological motive by virtue of which the human being tends to project on the other and even in inanimate nature a double of himself. The mixture of both motives is deemed responsible for a remarkable bias in the current understanding of the SETI programme. Despite the fact that such a programme might well be aimed at any biological formation which could be arbitrarily different from all known forms, it is focused instead on a very special kind of being: beings that possess both the natural property of the type of mentality we identify with: intelligence, and the ideal one of being possible co-subjects for a Science of Nature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailly, F. & Longo, G. (2006). Mathématiques et sciences de la nature. La singularité physique du vivant. Hermann, Paris.Google Scholar
Berthoz, A. & Petit, J.-L. (2008). The Physiology and Phenomenology of Action. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharjee, Y. & Shostak, S. (2012). SETI and the search for extraterrestrial life. Science Live 3 May 2012.Google Scholar
Blair, R.J.R., Morris, J.S., Frith, C.D., Perrett, D.I. & Dolan, R.J. (1999). Dissociable neural responses to facial expressions of sadness and anger. Brain 122, 883893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowler, B.P., Liu, M.C., Dupuy, T.J. & Cushing, M.C. (2010). Near-infrared spectroscopy of the extrasolar plant HR 8799 b. Astrophys. J. 723, 850868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M.-C., Mazziotta, J.C. & Lenzi, G.L. (2003). Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100/9, 54975502.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes's Error. Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. A. Grosset/Putnam Books, New York.Google Scholar
de Gelder, B., Snyder, J., Greve, D., Gerard, G. & Hadjikhani, N. (2004). Fear fostersflight: a mechanism for fear contagion when perceiving emotion expressed by a whole body. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101/47, 1670116706.Google Scholar
Farber, M. (1940). Philosophical Essays in Memory of E. Husserl. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Fogassi, L., Frerrari, P.F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F. & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Parietal Lobe: from action organization to Intention understanding. Science 308, 662667.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J.J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Grossman, E., Donnelly, M., Price, R., Pickens, D., Morgan, V., Neighbor, G. & Blake, R. (2000). Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 12/5, 711720.Google Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41, 301307.Google Scholar
Heider, F. & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. Am. J. Psychol. 57, 243259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlass. Dritter Teil: 1929–1935, Hrsg. I. Kern, Marinus Nijhoff, Den Haag.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. (1976). Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die transzendantale Phänomenologie. Eine Einleitung in die phänomenologische Philosophie, Hrsg. Biemel, W., Martinus Nijhoff, Den Haag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, E. (2008). Die Lebenswelt. Auslegungen der vorgegebenen Welt und ihrer Konstitution. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1916–1937), Hrsg. Sowa, R., Springer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept. Psychophys. 14(2), 201211.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1994). La Nature. Notes. Cours du Collège de France. Seuil, Paris.Google Scholar
Michotte, A. (1963). The Perception of Causality. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Perret, D.I., Rolls, E.T. & Caan, W. (1982). Visual neurons responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 47, 329342.Google Scholar
Petitot, J. (2011). Cognitive Morphodynamics. Dynamical Morphological Models of Constituency in Perception and Syntax. Peter Lang, Bern.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Rev. Neurosci. 6, 576582.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. (1999). Resonance behaviors and mirror neurons. Arch. Ital. Biol. 137, 85100.Google ScholarPubMed
Rose, C. & Wright, G. (2004). Inscribed matter as an energy-efficient means of communication with an extraterrestrial civilization. Nature 431, 4749.Google Scholar
Swain, M.R., Vasisht, G. & Tinetti, G. (2008). The presence of methane in the atmosphere of an extrasolar planet. Nature 452, 329331.Google Scholar
Swain, M.R., Tinetti, G., Vasisht, G., Deroo, P., Griffith, C., Bouwman, J., Pin Chen, Yung Y., Burrows, A., Brown, L.R., Matthews, J., Roe, J.F., Kuschnig, R. & Angerhausen, D. (2009). Water, Methane, and Carbon Dioxide present in the dayside spectrum of the exoplanet HD 209458b. Astrophys. J. 704, 16161621.Google Scholar