Introduction
Christophe Jaffrelot's latest book meticulously explores how Gujarat, under Modi, became a microcosm of the larger ideological and political shifts occurring across India, drawing on theoretical frameworks encompassing nationalism, governance, and identity politics. It primarily focuses on the period when Modi served as the Chief Minister of Gujarat, from 2001 to 2014, leveraging this study to thoroughly consider its significance for understanding his governance style and policies after he became Prime Minister of India in 2014. His controversial tenure in Gujarat is seen as the laboratory for his later, more expansive policies as Prime Minister of India. By dissecting Modi's governance in Gujarat, Jaffrelot provocatively unveils the strategic manoeuvres and ideological tropes that would come to define his approach on the national and international stages. This is not a new idea but is undertaken with immense acumen in this truly authoritative study, which will become the defining work on the connection between Modi's rule of the Gujarat and that of India.
Jaffrelot argues that Modi strategically utilised the Hindutva ideology to consolidate his political base, as seen in his emphasis on promoting Gujarati ‘asmita’ (pride) and his authoritarian tendencies in decision-making. While Modi's economic policies attracted significant investment and boosted industrial growth, they also exacerbated economic disparities and social polarisation. Additionally, Modi's personality cult was carefully constructed and maintained through a sophisticated use of media and public relations, taking precedence over the functionality of democratic checks and balances and the equality constitutionally ensured to religious minorities.
Jaffrelot's analysis, organized into thematic chapters, traverses diverse facets of Gujarat's evolution under Modi, and the definition of Modi's leadership in the Gujarat. Commencing with an examination of its historical and cultural fabric, it proceeds to dissect Modi's political manoeuvres. Subsequent chapters thoroughly probe economic policies, societal shifts, communal tensions, and the media's sway over public perception. This comprehensive approach highlights the intricate interplay between ostensible economic advancement and political authority in Gujarat's ever-evolving political landscape, ultimately questioning the true extent of this development.
Centralisation and Authoritarianism in Modi's Rule
Jaffrelot examines Narendra Modi's ascent to power, emphasising his strategic utilisation of Hindutva ideology to solidify his political base. He describes Modi's governance model, often dubbed the “Gujarat Model,” as a combination of economic liberalisation, infrastructure development, and the aggressive promotion of Gujarati pride. This characterisation underscores the multifaceted nature of Modi's leadership style, adding depth to Jaffrelot's analysis.
In evaluating Modi's governance style, he highlights the centralisation of power and top-down decision-making processes. He argues that Modi's authoritarian tendencies were manifest in his handling of dissent within the Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) and civil society. Furthermore, his scholarship explores the cultivation and maintenance of Modi's personality cult through strategic media and public relations efforts, unveiling on the mechanisms behind his charismatic leadership. Jaffrelot does not hold any punches when critiquing the decline of democratic institutions and practices through Modi's rise to primacy.
Assessing Modi's Economic Agenda in Gujarat
While acknowledging the state's economic growth and infrastructural development, which earned Modi accolades from business leaders and investors, Jaffrelot also raises significant concerns about the model's sustainability and inclusiveness.
He critiques the uneven distribution of economic benefits, noting that few marginalised communities or rural areas reaped the rewards of Gujarat's economic prosperity, and often came out far worse. Beyond economic disparities, Jaffrelot highlights the environmental costs associated with rapid industrialisation under Modi's leadership. Issues such as land acquisition, community displacement, and degradation of natural resources underscore the environmental toll of Gujarat's development trajectory. Whilst Modi's economic policies succeeded in attracting investment, he contends that they prioritised corporate interests over social welfare and environmental sustainability. This focus on economic growth at the expense of social and environmental considerations raises questions about the long-term viability and equity of Gujarat's development model under Modi.
By critically evaluating the economic dimensions of Modi's governance in Gujarat, Jaffrelot offers valuable insights into the complexities and trade-offs inherent in pursuing economic growth and development. His analysis prompts deeper reflection on the need for more inclusive and sustainable approaches to governance and economic policymaking.
Gujarat's Complex Interplay of Identities
One of the most significant contributions of Jaffrelot's book is its in-depth analysis of the communal dynamics in Gujarat during Modi's tenure, particularly focusing on the 2002 Gujarat riots. These riots were not merely a spontaneous outbreak of violence, but rather a culmination of deep-rooted socio-political tensions and the mobilisation of communal sentiments.
Jaffrelot examines the causes and impacts of the 2002 Gujarat riots, contextualising them within the historical backdrop of Hindu–Muslim relations in the state. He delves into the political calculations and factors that exacerbated communal tensions, illuminating the complexities of inter-group dynamics in Gujarat. It then explores the aftermath of the riots, highlighting the challenges faced by victims in seeking justice and accountability. It examines the role of civil society organisations and activists in advocating for the rights of victims and promoting inter-community dialogue. Despite efforts to address the grievances of affected communities, Jaffrelot underscores the disproportionate effects faced by increasingly marginalised Muslim communities in Gujarat.
By providing a nuanced analysis of the 2002 Gujarat riots and their broader implications for Hindu–Muslim relations, the work contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities of communal dynamics in contemporary India. This examination likewise prompts critical reflection on the need for inclusive and equitable approaches to governance and social cohesion in multi-religious societies.
Modi's Narrative Control and Public Perception
The role of media in shaping public perception of Modi and his policies is a central theme in Jaffrelot's book, illuminating the intricate relationship between politics and media in contemporary India. He provides a nuanced analysis of how Modi leveraged both traditional and new media channels to craft his image as a decisive and development-oriented leader.
Through a symbiotic relationship with the media, Modi was able to garner positive coverage that bolstered his political standing, while simultaneously marginalising critical voices and dissenting viewpoints. It exposes the mechanisms through which Modi and his administration manipulated media narratives to project a narrative of progress and prosperity, despite persisting social and economic challenges. Instrumental to this were the ownership structures of media outlets, censorship practises, and the prevalence of biased reporting or propaganda. By contextualising Modi's media strategy within the larger socio-political context, he provides a comprehensive understanding of the dynamics at play. He argues that while Modi's communication strategy was highly effective in projecting a positive image, it also contributed to the distortion of reality and the suppression of dissenting voices.
By critically analysing the role of media in shaping public perception of Modi and his policies, Jaffrelot's work prompts critical reflection on the ethical responsibilities of media in a democratic society and underscores the importance of media literacy in discerning truth from propaganda.
A Tapestry of Comparative Scholarship
While there have been numerous accounts of Modi's tenure in Gujarat, Jaffrelot's book is distinguished by its depth of research and critical analysis. The book offers a multi-dimensional perspective, integrating political, economic, social, and media studies to provide a holistic understanding of the Gujarat experience.
Jaffrelot's work builds on previous scholarship that has explored the rise of Hindutva politics and the economic transformation of Gujarat. For example, Varshney (Reference Varshney2003) provides an in-depth analysis of ethnic conflict and the role of civic engagement in either mitigating or exacerbating communal violence. Varshney's framework for understanding ethnic riots through the lens of local civic networks offers a critical backdrop to Jaffrelot's examination of the 2002 Gujarat riots, highlighting how political calculations and the mobilisation of communal sentiments played a pivotal role in the violence. This comparative insight deepens the reader's understanding of the mechanisms behind communal tensions and the long-term impact on Hindu–Muslim relations in Gujarat.
Additionally, Hansen (Reference Hansen1999) delves into the rise of Hindu nationalism and the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), providing essential context for understanding Modi's strategic use of Hindutva ideology. Hansen's exploration of the ideological roots and political strategies of Hindu nationalism complements Jaffrelot's analysis by situating Modi's governance within a broader historical and ideological framework.
Jaffrelot's analysis is enhanced by incorporating insights from Kohli's (Reference Kohli2004) examination of state-led development models provides a valuable comparative perspective on the economic policies implemented during Modi's tenure. Kohli's work underscores the strengths and limitations of state-directed development, highlighting the importance of political power in driving industrialisation and economic growth, which parallels Jaffrelot's critical evaluation of the “Gujarat Model.”
All in all, by integrating insights from these groundbreakings, this scholarship can be seen as part of a broader scholarly conversation that examines the intersections of politics, development, and social change in contemporary India. These complementary perspectives enrich the understanding of the complexities and implications of Modi's tenure in Gujarat, offering a more holistic view of the state's transformation and its significance for India's future.
Global Ripples: Modi's Gujarat and Its Impact on the World Stage
Gujarat's transformation under Modi's leadership had both nationwide and international ramifications, which both reverberated on the international stage. The economic growth and infrastructural development witnessed in Gujarat attracted attention from global investors and positioned the state as a favourable destination for business. Modi's proactive approach to attracting foreign investment and promoting Gujarat as an investor-friendly hub significantly enhanced India's image in the global economic landscape.
Furthermore, Gujarat's development model under Modi's stewardship served as a blueprint for other Indian states aspiring to replicate its success, quite apart from coordination by central government. Many state governments sought to adopt similar governance strategies, emphasising economic liberalisation, infrastructure development, and business-friendly policies. However, the extent to which these states could replicate Gujarat's model varied depending on their socio-economic contexts.
Internationally, Gujarat's economic achievements under Modi's leadership bolstered India's credibility as an emerging, and potentially leading, economic powerhouse. The state's success stories were showcased to international investors and policymakers as evidence of India's growth potential and investment opportunities. Modi's tenure in Gujarat played a crucial role in shaping perceptions of India's economic trajectory and its attractiveness as a destination for foreign investment, especially given the confidence that Modi would apply similar policies at a national level.
Moreover, Gujarat's model influenced diplomatic engagements and international relations, as Modi leveraged the state's economic success to strengthen India's ties with foreign governments and multinational corporations. His proactive engagement with global leaders and participation in international forums further enhanced India's diplomatic stature and facilitated greater collaboration on trade, investment, and technology transfer.
Overall, Gujarat's transformation under Modi's leadership had far-reaching implications beyond its borders, shaping India's global image and influencing diplomatic engagements. Additionally, the state's development model served as a source of inspiration for other Indian states seeking to replicate its success, highlighting the enduring impact of Modi's governance on India's socio-economic landscape.
Weighing the Evidence: Debating Jaffrelot's Portrayal of Modi's Gujarat
Jaffrelot does not shy away from highlighting the negative aspects of Modi's tenure, which might lead some readers to question the ease with which he overlooks hard economic development. For instance, Dehejia and Subramanya (Reference Dehejia and Subramanya2015) underscore the tangible economic benefits of Modi's governance in Gujarat, it is crucial to address the social and religious stratification observed in the development process. Similarly, Phadnis (Reference Phadnis2009) provides a political biography that emphasises Modi's leadership skills and efficiency in governance. Phadnis argues that Modi's ability to navigate complex political landscapes and brand Gujarat as an investor-friendly state was instrumental in its transformation into an economic powerhouse.
A balanced assessment of Modi's tenure in Gujarat should also consider the long-term impact of his policies on the state's socio-economic landscape. Beyond the immediate achievements highlighted by proponents of the “Gujarat Model,” such as economic growth and infrastructure development, it is crucial to examine the lasting effects on social cohesion, environmental sustainability, and political dynamics. Longitudinal studies and comparative analyses can shed light on whether the purported benefits of Modi's governance model have translated into sustainable development outcomes over time. Furthermore, the implications of Gujarat under Modi extend beyond the state's borders, shaping discussions about governance models, communal dynamics, and democratic institutions in India. Jaffrelot's works goes a long way towards responding to these demands, considering the wider context of India's society and politics, opening the door to consider India's development from multiple perspectives. It prompts a deeper reflection on the trade-offs involved in pursuing rapid economic growth and development, highlighting the need for inclusive and sustainable policies that prioritise the well-being of all citizens. By engaging with diverse perspectives and examining the broader implications, readers can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the complexities surrounding Modi's leadership in Gujarat and its significance for contemporary Indian politics. Ultimately, Jaffrelot brings a wealth of expertise to his analysis, given his unparallelled esteem in the study of Modi and India's development.
Conclusion
Gujarat Under Modi stands as a seminal work, offering invaluable insights into the intricate tapestry of political, economic, and social transformations that unfolded in Gujarat under the leadership of Narendra Modi. Jaffrelot's methodical research and astute analysis render this book an indispensable resource for scholars, policymakers, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of contemporary Indian politics. This work transcends academic enquiry, serving as a guiding beacon for comprehending India's evolving political landscape.
The lessons from Gujarat's experience under Modi's rule continue to inform discussions on governance, communal relations, and democratic principles. Engaging with Gujarat Under Modi, readers are encouraged to critically evaluate differing perspectives and participate in constructive dialogue. By acknowledging the diversity of interpretations surrounding Modi's tenure in Gujarat, we can foster a more nuanced understanding of India's political landscape and contribute to informed decision making. Ultimately, the enduring significance of Gujarat Under Modi lies in its capacity to deepen our understanding of the laboratory that is today's India. As we navigate the complexities of Indian politics and governance, Jaffrelot's work serves as a guiding light, illuminating the path forward with insights derived from rigorous scholarship and critical analysis.
