Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T02:42:37.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Revolutionary Nativism – Fascism and Culture in China 1925–1937 By Maggie Clinton. Durham: Duke University Press, 2017. Pp. xi + 268. ISBN 10: 0822363771; ISBN 13: 978-0822363774.

Review products

Revolutionary Nativism – Fascism and Culture in China 1925–1937 By Maggie Clinton. Durham: Duke University Press, 2017. Pp. xi + 268. ISBN 10: 0822363771; ISBN 13: 978-0822363774.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2019

Marc Andre Matten*
Affiliation:
Friedrich-Alexander-University, Erlangen-Nuremberg, Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Marc A. Matten, Imagining a Postnational World – Hegemony and Space in Modern China (Leiden: Brill, 2016); Barend ter Haar, “China's Inner Demons: The Political Impact of the Demonological Paradigm,” in Woei Lien Chong, ed., China's Great Proletarian Revolution: Master Narratives and Post-Mao Counternarratives (Rowman & Littlefield: London, 2002), pp. 27–68.

2 Stein Ugelvik Larsen, ed., Fascism Outside of Europe (New York: Columbia University Press, 2002).

3 See, here, the wonderful overviews on self-assertion discourses in East Asia: Iwo Amelung, Matthias Koch, Joachim Kurtz, Eun-Jeung Lee, and Sven Saaler, eds., Selbstbehauptungsdiskurse in Asien: China – Japan – Korea (München: Iudicium, 2003); also Michael Lackner et al., Zwischen Selbstbestimmung und Selbstbehauptung. Ostasiatische Diskurse des 20. und 21. Jahrhunderts (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2008).

4 On how even the Communist Party could not do without Confucian precepts for educating the masses in the revolutionary era, see He Zhaotian 贺照田, “Ruguo cong Ruxue chuantong he xiandai geming chuantong tongshi kan Lei Feng 如果从儒学传统和现代革命传统同时看雷锋” Kaifang shidai 6 (2017), pp. 118–44.