Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:39:36.517Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspectives on Asia: is China kitsch?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2020

Alberto Castelli Open the ORCID record for Alberto Castelli [Opens in a new window]
Alberto Castelli*
Affiliation:
Hainan University, Haikou, 570288, China
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Due to the introduction of the market economy, in the past four decades China has switched from being a “planned country” – planned economy, planned art – into a domestic version of cultural pluralism. Consumerism has refilled the vacuum left by the retreat of Maoist ideology. However, the overwhelming success of mass culture is sided by the progressive marginalization of the intellectuals or elite, featuring a culture that is kitsch in its ideological twist. In China, present-day cultural constructions provide a forum of debate for the identity of the whole nation, no more traditional, and not yet modern. In other words, consumerism and commercialism, triggered by products of market economy, have generated a cultural consumption of redundant bad taste. Kitsch indeed.1

Keywords

Avant-gardekitschMaoismpostmodernismsimulacra
Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Asian Studies , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , January 2021 , pp. 87 - 102
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Since banks and means of production, meaning land and industry, belong to the state, one objection that I often receive on the topic is that China is not a market economy. I will not address, in this paper, the discussion on the market economy in China for it is too far from my line of research, which is essentially sociological. In addition, on the matter, it has been written for nearly 40 years. “Socialism with Chinese characteristic” remains an ambiguous expression representing the Chinese model, which is loyalty to the one-Party rule and market-oriented economy. It is a fact that today foreign trade contributes contribute to roughly 70% of China's GDP, while the total asset of the five state-owned banks accounts for some-more than 30 percent of all banking financial institutions. To some extent, the very same Deng Xiaoping gave the best answer on the subject during his quasi-imperial tour in Southern China (1992): “Planning and market forces are not the essential difference between socialism and capitalism. A planned economy is not the definition of socialism, because there is planning under capitalism; the market economy happens under socialism, too. Planning and market forces are both ways of controlling economic activity.” Market economy is perhaps an improper definition, and yet since 2001 China is a member of the WTO. We should accept the fact that China is in a primary stage of socialism and capitalism as well; due to the relatively low level of material wealth and the high number of the rural population, “Socialism with Chinese characteristics” is a fitting narrative to describe the ideological liaison between socialism and capitalism.

References

Bernard, Chan (2005). New Architecture in China. London: Merrell Publishers Limited.Google Scholar
Botz-Bornstein, T. (2012). “Hyperreal Monuments of the Mind: Traditional Chinese Architecture and Disneyland.” Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review 23:2, pp. 7–17. Retrieved July 2, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41758892.Google Scholar
de Alexis, Tocqueville (1961). Democracy in America. Translated by Reeve, Henry. New York: Schocken Books. Original work published in 1835.Google Scholar
Dwight, Macdonald (2011). Masscult and Midcult Essays Against the American Grain. New York: New York Review Books. Original work published in 1962.Google Scholar
Fan, K. (2009). “Culture for Sale: Western Classical Architecture in China's Recent Building Boom.” Journal of Architectural Education (1984–), 63:1, pp. 64–74. Retrieved July 2, 2020, from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40481003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fredric, Jameson (1991). Postmodernism, or, The Logic of Late Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Geremie, Barmé R. (1999). In The Red. On Contemporary Chinese Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gillo, Dorfles ed. (1970). Kitsch. An Anthology of Bad Taste. London: Studio Vista.Google Scholar
Guanhong, Chen 陈冠宏 (2002). “Oulufeng’ jianzhu weishemo zai zhongguo fanlan?” 欧陆风” 建筑为什么在中国泛滥? (“Why is “European continental style” architecture widespread in China?”). Huazhong Architecture 2, pp. 22–23.Google Scholar
Guidieri, R. and Pellizzi, F. (1981). “Editorial,” Anthropology and Aesthetics 1, p. 4.Google Scholar
Hal, Foster (1996). The Return of the Real: The Avant-Garde at the End of the Century. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Henri, Lefebvre (1991). The Production of Space. Translated by Nicholson-Smith, Donald. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Irving, Howe (1970). The Decline of the New. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Jean, Baudrillard (1994). The Illusion of the End. Translated by Turner, Chris. New York: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Leys, S. (2008). “The Chinese Attitude Towards the Past.” China Heritage Quarterly 14. Available online at: http://www.chinaheritagequarterly.org/articles.php?searchterm=014_chineseAttitude.inc&issue=014.Google Scholar
Liu, Kang (2004). Globalization and Cultural Trends in China. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Giesz (1960). Phanomenologie des Kitsches. Rothe: Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Matei, Călinescu (1977). Faces of Modernity. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Max, Horkheimer (2002). Critical Theory. Selected Essays. Translated by O'Connell, Matthew J. and Others. New York: Continuum Publishing Corporation. Original work published in 1972.Google Scholar
Mian, Mian 棉棉 (2003). 糖 Táng [Candy]. Translated by Lingenfelter, Andrea. Boston: Black Bay Books. Original work published in 2001.Google Scholar
Ming, Xia 夏明 (1999). “Guanyu Oulu fengge’ de sikao” 关于欧陆风格” 的思考 (“Thoughts on “European continental style”). The Architectural Journal 11, pp. 44–45.Google Scholar
Peter, Burger (1984). The Theory of the Avant-Garde. Translated by Shaw, Michael. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Bernstein P. (1977). Up the Mountains and Down the Villages: The Transfer of Youth from Urban to Rural China. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Campanella J. (2008). The Concrete Dragon: China's Urban Revolution and What It Means for the World. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
Thorstein, Veblen (2007). Theory of the Leisure Class. New York: Oxford University Press. Original work published in 1899.Google Scholar
Umberto, Eco (1964). Apocalittici e Integrati. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Umberto, Eco (1986). Travels in Hyperreality. Translated by Weaver, William. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
Umberto, Eco (1989). The Open Work. Translated by Cancogni, Anna. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Umberto, Eco (2007). On Ugliness. Translated by McEwen, Alastair. London: Harvill Secker.Google Scholar
Weicheng, Zhang 张为城 (2000). “Houzhiminzhuyi qingshi xia de houxiandaizhuyi – ping shanghai jianzhu de ‘oulu fengqing’ feng” 后殖民主义情势下的后现代主义 – 评上海建筑的“欧陆风清” 风 (“Postmodernism in the context of post-colonialism – a criticism of the “European continental flavor” in the architecture in Shanghai”). Time+Architecture 1, pp. 23–26.Google Scholar
Xiaoming, Wang 王晓明 ed. (1996). 人文精神寻 Renwen jingshen xinsi lu [Thoughts on the ‘Humanistic Spirit’]. Shanghai: Wenhui chubanshe, pp. 1–17.Google Scholar
Xiaoping, Lin (2010). Children of Marx and Coca-Cola. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Yiwu, Zhang and Berry, Michael (1997). “Postmodernism and Chinese Novels of the Nineties.” Boundary 2, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 247–259. JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/303715. Accessed 11 Sept. 2020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Wei Hui 周卫慧 (2001). 上海宝贝Shànghǎi Bǎobèi [Shanghai Baby]. Translated by Humes, Bruce. New York: Washington Square Press. Original work published in 1999.Google Scholar
Zhou, Wei Hui 周卫慧 (2005). 我的禅 Wǒ de Chán [Marrying Buddha]. Translated by Heinrich, Larissa. London: Robinson. Original work published in 2004.Google Scholar
Zuoya, Cao 曹左雅 (2003). Literary Works about the Rusticated Youth. Oxford: Lexington Books.Google Scholar