Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:50:44.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Winds from Disks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

J.E. Drew
J.E. Drew*
Affiliation:
Department of Astrophysics, Keble Road, Oxford 0X1 3RH

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The disks referred to in the title of this paper are specifically those present in cataclysmic variables in which the accreting white dwarf has a relatively weak magnetic field (≪ 1 MG). Such systems are classified either as nova-like variables or as dwarf novae, and are of interest here because they are believed to be novae in quiescence (Ritter and Livio discuss this point elsewhere in this volume).

This review aims to do two things: i) to summarise what has been learned about the winds associated with non-magnetic cataclysmic variables both from observation and from numerical modelling, and ii) to outline ideas about the nature of the mass loss mechanism. By contrast with the certainty that nova outflows are the consequence of thermonuclear runaway, it shall be seen that the fundamental cause of mass loss from cataclysmic variables remains obscure. An earlier review of this subject is by Cordova and Howarth (1986). Also of interest are some sections of the monograph on dwarf novae and nova-like variables by LaDous (1989).

Type
2. Models of Observations
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 122: Physics of Classical Novae , 1990 , pp. 228 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1990

References

Cannizzo, J.K., Pudritz, R.E., 1988, Astrophys. J., 327, 840.Google Scholar
Castor, J.I., 1987, in ‘Instabilities in Luminous Early-Type Stars’, eds. Lamers, H.J.G.L.M. and de Loore, C.W.H., Reidel, pp 159–170.Google Scholar
Cordova, F.A., Howarth, I.D., 1986, in ‘Exploring the Universe with the IUE Satellite’, eds. Kondo, Y. et al, Reidel pp 395–426.Google Scholar
Cordova, F.A., Mason, K.O., 1982, Astrophys. J., 260, 716.Google Scholar
Cordova, F.A., Mason, K.O., 1985, Astrophys. J., 290, 671.Google Scholar
Drew, J.E., 1987, Mon. Not. R. ast. Soc, 224, 595.Google Scholar
Drew, J.E., Verbunt, F., 1985, Mon. Not. R. ast. Soc., 213, 191.Google Scholar
Drew, J.E., Verbunt, F., 1988, Mon. Not. R. ast. Soc., 234, 341.Google Scholar
Honneycutt, R.K., Schlegel, E.M., Kaitchuk, R.H., 1986, Astrophys. J., 302, 388.Google Scholar
Kallman, T.R., 1987, in proc. IAU/COSPAR conference, ‘Accretion onto Compact Objects’, held in Sofia, Bulgaria, in press.Google Scholar
Kallman, T.R., Jensen, K.A., 1985, Astrophys. J., 299, 277.Google Scholar
King, A.R., Frank, J., Jameson, R.F., Sherrington, M.R., 1983, Mon. Not. R. ast. Soc., 203, 677.Google Scholar
LaDous, C., 1989, in ‘Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects’, ed. Hack, M., NASA/CNRS Monograph Series on Non-Thermal Phenomena in Stellar Atmospheres.Google Scholar
Mauche, C.W., Raymond, J.C., 1987, Astrophys. J., 323, 690.Google Scholar
Naylor, T., et al., 1988, Mon. Not. R. ast. Soc., 231, 237.Google Scholar
Patterson, J., Raymond, J.C., 1985, Astrophys. J., 292, 505.Google Scholar
Pringle, J.E., Savonije, G.J., 1979, Mon. Not. R. ast. Soc., 210, 197.Google Scholar
Pudritz, R.E., Norman, C.A., 1986, Astrophys. J., 301, 571.Google Scholar
Szkody, P., Mateo, M., 1986, Astrophys. J., 301, 286.Google Scholar
Verbunt, F., et al., 1984, Mon. Not. R. ast. Soc., 210, 197.Google Scholar
Woods, J.A., Drew, J.E., Verbunt, F., 1989, in preparation.Google Scholar