Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-495rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T02:56:36.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The White Dwarf Mass and Orbital Period Distribution in Zero-Age Cataclysmic Binaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

M. Politano
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
R. F. Webbink
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A zero-age cataclysmic binary (ZACB) we define as a binary system at the onset of interaction as a cataclysmic variable. We present here the results of calculations of the distributions of white dwarf masses and of orbital periods in ZACBs, due to binaries present in a stellar population which has undergone continuous, constant star formation for 1010 years.

Distributions of ZACBs were calculated for binaries formed t years ago, for log t = 7.4 (the youngest age at which viable ZACBs can form) to log t = 10.0 (the assumed age of the Galactic disk), in intervals of log t = 0.1. These distributions were then integrated over time to obtain the ZACB distribution for a constant rate of star formation. To compute the individual distributions for a given t, we require the density of systems forming (number of pre-cataclysmics forming per unit volume of orbital parameter space), n£(t), and the rates at which the radii of the secondary and of its Roche lobe are changing in time, s (t) and L, s (t), respectively. In calculating nf(t), we assume that the distribution of the orbital parameters in primordial (ZAMS) binaries may be written as the product of the distribution of masses of ZAMS stars (Miller and Scalo 1979), the distribution of mass ratios in ZAMS binaries (cf. Popova, et al., 1982), and the distribution of orbital periods in ZAMS binaries (Abt 1983). In transforming the the orbital parameters from progenitor (ZAMS) to offspring (ZACB) binaries, we assume that all of the orbital energy deposited into the envelope during the common envelope phase leading to ZACB formation goes into unbinding that envelope. R.L, s (t) is determined from orbital angular momentum loss rates due to gravitational radiation (Landau and Lifshitz 1951) and magnetic braking (γ = 2 in Rappaport, Verbunt, and Joss 1983). We turn off magnetic braking if the secondary is completely convective.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1989

References

Abt, H. 1983, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 21, 343.Google Scholar
Landau, L., and Lifshitz, E. 1951, The Classical Theory of Fields, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Miller, G.E., and Scalo, J.M. 1979, Astrophys. J. Suppl., 41, 513.Google Scholar
Popova, E.I., Tutukov, A.V., and Yungelson, L.R. 1982, Astrophys. Space Sci., 88, 55.Google Scholar
Rappaport, S., Verbunt, F., and Joss, P.C. 1983, Astrophys. J., 275, 713 Google Scholar
Ritter, H., and Burkert, A. 1986, Astron. Astrophys., 158, 161.Google Scholar
Webbink, R.F. 1979, in IAU Colloq. No. 53, White Dwarfs and Variable Degenerate Stars, Van Horn, H.M. and Weidemann, V. (eds.), Univ. of Rochester Press, p. 426.Google Scholar