Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:47:40.552Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Unpulsed High-Energy Radiation from the Crab Pulsar and Nebula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

W. M. Cheung
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
K. S. Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Generally, people believe that the unpulsed high-energy gamma rays from the direction of Crab Nebula and pulsar comes from the nebula. But it is entirely possible that the unpulsed high-energy gamma rays from the direction of the Crab Nebula and pulsar are actually emitted from a region extending to a couple of light cylinder radii from the pulsar instead of from the extensive nebula. In this conference paper, we study the possibility that the unpulsed high-energy gamma rays from 100 MeV to 10 GeV are emitted from the extensive nebula. In our model, two pulsed photon beams from two different outer gaps cross each other beyond the light cylinder and result in pair production. Since the pitch angles of these pairs do not correlate with the local magnetic field, and the typical mean free path for pair production is comparable to the local radius of curvature, the subsequent synchrotron radiation and inverse-Compton scattering produce unpulsed X-rays and gamma-rays respectively.

Subject headings: acceleration of particles — gamma rays: theory — ISM: individual (Crab Nebula) — pulsars: individual (Crab) — radiation mechanisms: nonthermal

Type
Poster Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The American Astronomical Society 1994

References

Arons, J., Gallant, Y.A., Hoshino, M., Langdon, B., & Max, C. E. 1991, in IAU Colloq. 128, Magnetospheric Structure and Emission Mechanisms of Radio Pulsars, ed. Gil, J.A., Hankins, T.H., & Rankin, J. M., in pressGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, G.R., & Gould, R.J. 1970, Rev. Mod. Phys., 42, 237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, K.S., Ho, C., & Ruderman, M. 1986a, ApJ, 300, 500(CHR I)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, K.S., Ho, C., & Ruderman, M. 1986b, ApJ, 300, 522(CHR II)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheung, W.M., & Cheng, K.S. 1993, ApJ, 413, 694 (Paper II)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clear, J., et al. 1987, A&A, 174, 85 Google Scholar
Coroniti, F.V. 1990, ApJ, 349, 538 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jager, O.C., & Harding, A.K. 1992, ApJ, 396, 161 Google Scholar
Gould, R.J. 1965, Phys. Rev. Lett., 15, 577 Google Scholar
Grindlay, J.E., & Hoffman, J.A. 1971, Ap. Lett., 8, 209 Google Scholar
Ho, C. 1989, ApJ, 342, 396 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennel, C.F., & Coroniti, F.V. 1984, ApJ, 283, 694 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, F.K. 1982, ApJ, 260, 538 Google Scholar
Kwok, P.W., Cheng, K.S., & Lau, M.M. 1991, ApJ, 379, 653 (Paper I)Google Scholar
Mahoney, W.A., Ling, J.C., & Jacobson, A.S. 1983, ApJ, 278, 784 Google Scholar
Pravdo, S.H., & Serlemitsos, P. 1981, ApJ, 246, 484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieke, G.H., & Weekes, T.C. 1969, ApJ, 15, 577 Google Scholar
Vacanti, G., et al. 1991, ApJ, 377, 467 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walraven, G.D., Hall, R.D., Meegan, C.A., Coleman, P.L., Shelton, D.H., & Haymes, R.C. 1975, ApJ, 202, 502 Google Scholar