Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T13:42:45.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Understanding low and high velocity dispersion compact groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

G. A. Mamon*
Affiliation:
IAP, F-75014 Paris, FRANCE

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A galaxy system must have a minimum velocity dispersion for its mass to be greater than the sum of the masses of its galaxies. Nearly half of the nearby Hickson compact groups (HCGs) have too low a velocity dispersion in comparison with the rotational velocities of their spiral galaxies and internal velocity dispersions of their early types.

A detailed study of the low velocity dispersion group, HCG 16 – the only known group of late-type galaxies with diffuse intergalactic X-ray emitting hot gas – reveals that half of the diffuse X rays are associated with foreground/background sources and the remaining gas is clumpy and mostly associated with the bright galaxies of the group. The large-scale environment of the group suggests that HCG 16 lies where a cosmological filament falls perpendicularly onto a large-scale sheet.

The observed frequency of compact groups is lower than predicted from the extended Press-Schechter formalism, which also predicts that most 1013 M objects in the Universe must be fairly old and hence have already coalesced into single objects, reminiscent of elliptical galaxies over-luminous in X-rays that are now being discovered.

Thus, the low survival time of dense groups against the merging instability is no longer a worry for compact groups, as they form in large enough numbers. I show why other arguments against the reality of HCGs no longer hold, partly because of the biases of Hickson’s sample.

Type
Part 2. Properties of Small Groups
Copyright
Copyright © Astronomical Society of the Pacific 2000

References

Athanassoula, E., Makino, J., Bosma, A., 1997, MNRAS 286, 825 Google Scholar
Bode, P.W., Cohn, H.N., Lugger, P.M., 1993, ApJ 416, 17 Google Scholar
de Carvalho, R.R., Ribeiro, A.L.B., Zepf, S.E., 1994, ApJS 93, 47 Google Scholar
Dos Santos, S., Mamon, G.A., 1999, A&A in press, astro-ph/9811271Google Scholar
Governato, F., Bhatia, R., Chincarini, G., 1991, ApJ 371, L15 Google Scholar
Governato, F., Tozzi, P., Cavaliere, A., 1996, ApJ 458, 18 Google Scholar
Hernquist, L., Katz, N., Weinberg, D.H., 1995, ApJ 442, 57 (HKW)Google Scholar
Hickson, P., 1982, ApJ 255, 382 Google Scholar
Kitayama, T., Suto, Y., 1996, MNRAS 280, 638 Google Scholar
Lacey, C., Cole, S., 1993, MNRAS 262, 627 Google Scholar
Mamon, G.A., 1986, ApJ 307, 426 Google Scholar
Mamon, G.A., 1987, ApJ 321, 622 Google Scholar
Mamon, G.A., 1992, in 2nd DAEC mtg., Distribution of Matter in the Universe, Mamon, G.A., Gerbal, D., Paris: Obs. de Paris, p. 51, ftp: //ftp. iap. fr/pub/from_users/gam/PAPERS/daec92-cg.dvi.Z Google Scholar
Mamon, G.A., 1999, to be submitted to A&AGoogle Scholar
Mulchaey, J.S., Zabludoff, A.I., 1999, ApJ 514, 133 Google Scholar
Navarro, J.F., Frenk, C.S., White, S.D.M., 1995, MNRAS 275, 720 Google Scholar
Ponman, T.J., Bourner, P.D.J., Ebeling, H., Böhringer, H., 1996, MNRAS 283, 690 (PBEB)Google Scholar
Postman, M., Geller, M.J., 1984, ApJ 281, 95 Google Scholar
Prandoni, I., Iovino, A., MacGillivray, H.T., 1994, AJ 107, 1235 Google Scholar
Press, W.H., Schechter, P., 1974, ApJ 187, 425 Google Scholar
Ribeiro, A.L.B., de Carvalho, R.R., Coziol, R., Capelato, H.V., Zepf, S.E., 1996, ApJ 463, L5 Google Scholar
Saracco, P., Ciliegi, P., 1995, A&A 301, 348 Google Scholar
Vikhlinin, A., McNamara, B.R., Hornstrup, A., Quintana, H., Forman, W., Jones, C., Way, M., 1999, ApJ 520, L1 Google Scholar
Walke, D.G., Mamon, G.A., 1989, A&A 225, 291 Google Scholar
Weinberger, R., Temporin, S., Kerber, F., 1999, ApJ in press, astro-ph/9907304Google Scholar
Zabludoff, A.I., Mulchaey, J.S., 1998, ApJ 496, 39 Google Scholar