Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T21:25:34.872Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Status and Needs of Astrometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2016

James A. Hughes
James A. Hughes*
Affiliation:
U.S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C. 20390

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A review will be presented of the status of the fundamental reference system. Mention will be made of the problems limiting the accuracy of transit circles and photographic astrometry and attempts at possible improvments in the near future. The progress in the preparation of the FK5 will be briefly mentioned, as will be the various methods used to approximate an inertial reference frame. Needs for higher accuracy in Astronomy fall in the area of better modeling of the Earth's motion (rotation, nutation, precession, the ecliptic, etc.) as well as a parallax and proper motion determination for galactic structure studies, stellar dynamics and stellar evolution. It will be assumed that interferometric binary star studies will be discussed elsewhere.

Type
The Scientific Programme
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 50: High Angular Resolution Stellar Interferometry , January 1979 , pp. 19-1 - 19-9
Copyright
Copyright © 1979

References

(1) Clemence, G.M., Proceedings of the Meeting on Problems of Astrometry and Celestial Mechanics, La Plata, 1961.Google Scholar
(2) Branham, R., private communication, 1978.Google Scholar
(3) Fricke, W. and Kopff, A., “Fourth Fundamental Catalog (FK4),” Veroff. Ast. Rechen-Institut, 1963.Google Scholar
(4) Lederle, T., Wiss. Z. Tech. Univ. Dresden, 25, 948, 1976.Google Scholar
(5) Høg, E., “New Problems in Astrometry” (I.A.U. Symposium No.61), Gliese, W., Murray, C.A., Tucker, R.H., eds., Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, p.243, 1974.Google Scholar
(6) D., Currie, University of Maryland Techn. Rep. 77-076, 1977.Google Scholar
(7) Hughes, J.A., “New Problems in Astrometry” (I.A.U. Symposium No.61), Gliese, W., Murray, C.A., Tucker, R.H., eds., Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, p.237, 1974.Google Scholar
(8) Hughes, J.A., “Refractional Influences in Astrometry and Geodesy“ (I.A.U. Symposium No.89), in press.Google Scholar
(9) Harrington, R., private communication, 1978.Google Scholar
(10) Fricke, W., “New Problems in Astrometry” (I.A.U. Symposium No.61), Gliese, W., Murray, C.A., Tucker, R.H., eds., Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, p.l, 1974.Google Scholar
(11) Lieske, J.H., Lederle, T., Fricke, W. and Morando, B., Astron. Astrophys., 58, 1, 1977.Google Scholar