Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:35:52.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Rotation of the Sun* (Review Paper)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

R. H. Dicke*
Affiliation:
Palmer Physical Laboratory, Princeton University, Princeton, N.J., U.S.A.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The author’s 1964 article in Nature on the sun’s rotation is rediscussed in the light of new data. This article suggested that the sun might be oblate because of a gravitational quadrupole moment induced by a core rotating with a period < 2 days. Angular momentum lost from the core by molecular diffusion was assumed to be transferred to the solar wind which kept the sun’s surface rotating slowly. The estimated solar wind torque was found to be in good agreement with the torque calculated from a solution of the diffusion equation.

Type
Part IV / The Rotation of the Sun
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1970

Footnotes

*

This research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation and the Office of Naval Research of the U.S. Navy.

References

Alfonso-Faus, A.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 5576.Google Scholar
Allen, C. W.: 1963, Astrophysical Quantities, Athlone Press, London.Google Scholar
Babcock, H. W.: 1961, Astrophys J. 133, 572.Google Scholar
Baker, N. and Kippenhahn, R.: 1959, Z. Astrophys. 48, 140.Google Scholar
Bergmann, P.: 1948, Ann. Math. 49, 255.Google Scholar
Brans, C. and Dicke, R. H.: 1961, Phys. Rev. 124, 925.Google Scholar
Chazy, J.: 1928, La théorie de la relativité et de la mécanique céleste, Gauthier-Villars, Paris.Google Scholar
Cocke, W. J.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 150, 1041.Google Scholar
Coleman, P. J. Jr.: 1966, J. Geophys. Res. 71, 5509.Google Scholar
Colgate, S. A.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 153, L81.Google Scholar
Danziger, I. J.: 1969, Astrophys. Letters 3, 115.Google Scholar
Deutsch, A. J.: 1967, Science 156, 236.Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H.: 1962, Phys. Rev. 125, 2163.Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H.: 1964, Nature 202, 432.Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H.: 1966, Stellar Evolution (ed. by Stein, R. F. and Cameron, A. G. W.), Plenum Press., New York, p. 319.Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 149, L121.Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H.: 1969a, Astrophys. J. 159, 1.Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H.: 1969b, Astrophys. J. 159, 25.Google Scholar
Dicke, R. H. and Goldenberg, H. M.: 1967, Phys. Rev. Letters, 18, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, R. H. and Peebles, P. J. E.: 1965, Space Sci. Rev. 4, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, W. A., Caughlan, G. R., and Zimmerman, B. A.: 1967, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 5, 525.Google Scholar
Fricke, K.: 1968, Z. Astrophys. 68, 317.Google Scholar
Gilvarry, J. J. and Sturrock, P. A.: 1967, Nature 216, 1283.Google Scholar
Goldreich, P. and Schubert, G.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 150, 571.Google Scholar
Goldreich, P. and Schubert, G.: 1968, Astrophys. J. 154, 1005.Google Scholar
Herbig, G. H.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 141, 588.Google Scholar
Howard, L. N., Moore, D. W., and Spiegel, E. A.: 1967, Nature 214, 1297.Google Scholar
Jordan, P.: 1948, Astron. Nach. 276, 1955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, P.: 1959, Schwerkraft und Weltall, Vieweg, Braunschweig, Germany.Google Scholar
Kippenhahn, R.: 1963, Astrophys. J. 137, 664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, R.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 150, 551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraft, R.: 1968, ‘Stellar Rotation’ in Stellar Astronomy, Vol. 2 (ed. by Chiu, H. Y., Warasila, R. and Remo, J.), Gordon and Breach, New York.Google Scholar
Leighton, R. B.: 1969, Astrophys. J. 156, 1.Google Scholar
McDonald, B. E. and Dicke, R. H.: 1967, Science 158, 1562.Google Scholar
Mestel, L.: 1966, Z. Astrophys. 63, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mestel, L.: 1968, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 140, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modiesette, J. L.: 1967, J. Geophys. Res. 72, 1521.Google Scholar
Neugebauer, M. and Snyder, C. W.: 1966, J. Geophys. Res 71, 4469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newcomb, S.: 1897, Suppl. Am. Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac.Google Scholar
O’Connell, R. F.: 1968, Astrophys. J. (Letters) 152, L11.Google Scholar
Plaskett, H. H.: 1965, The Observatory 85, 178.Google Scholar
Preston, G. W.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 150, 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roxburgh, I. W.: 1964, Icarus 3, 92.Google Scholar
Schatzman, E.: 1962, Ann. Astrophys. 25, 18.Google Scholar
Schmal, G. and Schrôter, E. H.: 1965, Z. Astrophys. 62, 143.Google Scholar
Sears, R. L. and Weymann, R.: 1965, Astrophys. J. 142, 174.Google Scholar
Shapiro, I. I.: 1965, Icarus 4, 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, L.: 1962, Physics of Fully Ionized Gas (2nd ed.), Interscience, New York, p. 146.Google Scholar
Sturrock, P. A. and Gilvarry, J. J.: 1967, Nature 216, 1280.Google Scholar
Thirry, Y. R.: 1948, Comptes-Rendus 226, 216.Google Scholar
Thomas, L. H.: 1930, Quart. J. Math. 1, 239.Google Scholar
Von Zeipel, H.: 1924, Monthly Notices Roy. Astron. Soc. 84, 665.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, G. and Conti, P. S.: 1969, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 7, 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasiutynski, J.: 1946, Astrophys. Norv. 4.Google Scholar
Weber, E. J. and Davis, L. Jr.: 1967, Astrophys. J. 148, 217.Google Scholar
Weymann, R.: 1957, Astrophys. J. 126, 208.Google Scholar