Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:28:06.423Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Restoration Of Turbulence Degraded Images - A Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2016

P Nisenson  and
R. V. Stachnik
P Nisenson
Affiliation:
Center for Earth and Planetary Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA
R. V. Stachnik
Affiliation:
Center for Earth and Planetary Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The success of speckle interferometry in recovering high resolution information from atmospheric turbulence degraded images has renewed interest in the restoration of images recorded through a turbulent medium. There are a number of different approaches to image restoration which have been proposed. The effectiveness of each of these techniques is strongly dependent on the brightness and the angular extent of the object being observed. This paper will attempt to summarize the areas of application of such techniques, the current state-of-the-art in this field, and the expected performance range of the various techniques.

Type
The Scientific Programme
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 50: High Angular Resolution Stellar Interferometry , January 1979 , pp. 34-1 - 34-14
Copyright
Copyright © 1979

References

1) McGlamery, B. C., J. Opt. Soc. Am., 57, 293–297, 1967.Google Scholar
2) Goldberg, L., Xanthakis, J. N., 496, 1967.Google Scholar
3) Andrews, H. C. and Hunt, B. R., Digital Image Restoration (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall), 1977.Google Scholar
4) Goodman, J. W. and Belsher, J. F., “Fundamental limitations in linear invariant restoration of atmospherically degraded images,” Proceedings of the S.P.I.E., v 7, 1976.Google Scholar
5) Liu, C. Y. C. and Lohmann, A. W., Opt. Comm., 8, 372, 1973.Google Scholar
6) Weigelt, G. P., “Speckle holography measurements of Zeta Caneri and ADS 3358,” preprint.Google Scholar
7) Nisenson, P. and Stachnik, R., J.O.S.A., 68, 169, 1978.Google Scholar
8) Worden, S. P., Lynds, C. R. and Harvey, J. W., J.O.S.A., 66, 1243, 1976.Google Scholar
9) Brown, T. M., J.O.S.A., 68, (July) 1978.Google Scholar
10) Muller, R. A. and Buffington, A., J.O.S.A., 64, 1200–1210, 1974.Google Scholar
11) Gerchberg, R. W. and Saxton, W. O., Optik, 35, 237, 1972 Google Scholar
12) Fienup, J R., Optics Letters, 3, 27, 1978.Google Scholar
13) Knox, K. T. and Thompson, B. J., Astrophys J. (Lett), 193, L45–L48, 1974 Google Scholar
14) Hardy, J. W., Lefebvre, J. E. and Koliopoulos, C. L., J.O.S.A., 67, 360, 1977.Google Scholar
15) Nisenson, P., Ehn, D. C. and Stachnik, R. V., Proc. SPIE, 75, 83, 1976.Google Scholar
16) Stachnik, R. V., Nisenson, P., Ehn, D. C., Hudgin, R. H. and Schirf, V. E., Nature, 266, 149–151, 1977 Google Scholar
17) Roddier, F., Tech. Digest, Am. Astron. Soc. Top Mtg. on Imaging in Astron. (Cambridge, MA), June 1975.Google Scholar