Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T02:41:14.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relevancy of Magnetically Confined Plasmas - Tokamak and Mirror - for Atomic Spectroscopy And Astrophysical Plasma Diagnostics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

M. Finkenthal
M. Finkenthal*
Affiliation:
‘Racah’ Institute of Physics, The Hebrew University Jerusalem, Israel

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This talk presented the magnetic confinement experiments from a different angle, i.e. as laboratory sources which allow the study of various problems in such fields as atomic physics and astrophysics.

Tokamak and magnetic mirror plasmas have properties which make them particularly suitable for basic atomic physics experiments; they are stable over long intervals of time and have wide ranges of electrom densities and temperatures. Also, models on which electron density and temperature diagnostics are based in astrophysical research can be checked since these quantities are accurately measured by independent non-spectroscopic methods.

Type
Session 2. Low Density Laboratory Plasmas
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 86: Eighth International Colloquium on Ultraviolet and X-ray Spectroscopy of Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas , 1984 , pp. 37 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Naval Research Laboratory 1984. Publication courtesy of the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC.

References

Dufton, P.L., Hibbert, A., Kingston, A.E., Doschek, G.A. 1984, Astrophys. J. 274, 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eubank, H. et al., 1979, Phys. Rev. Lett., 43, 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkenthal, M., Bell, R.E., Moos, H.W. and TFR Group, 1982a, Phys. Lett. 88 A, 165 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkenthal, M. Hinnov, E., Cohen, S., Suckewer, S. 1982b, Phys. Lett. 91 A, 284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkenthal, M., Stratton, B.C. Moos, H.W., Hodge, W.L., Mandelbaum, P., Klapisch, M., and Cohen, S. 1984a, to be published.Google Scholar
Finkenthal, M., Stratton, B.C., Moos, H.W. and Bar-Shalom, A., Klapisch, M., 1984b to be published.Google Scholar
Furth, H., 1981, ‘The Tokamak’, Fusion, Vol. I, ed. Teller, E., Academic press.Google Scholar
Hodge, W.L., Stratton, B.C., and Moos, H.W., 1984, Rev. Sci, instr., 55, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marmar, E., Cecchi, J., and Cohen, S., 1975, Rev. Sci. Instr., 46, 1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolas, K.R. Bartoc, J.D.F., Brueckner, G.E., and Van Hoosier, M.E., 1979, Astrophys. J., 235, 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwob, J.L., Finkenthal, M., Suckewer, S., 1983, Proc. 7th International Conf. V.U.V. Radiation Phys., Jerusalem, Vol. 1, 54.Google Scholar
Schwob, J.L. Wouters, A.W., Suckewer, S. and Finkenthal, M., 1984 to be published.Google Scholar
Simonen, T.C., et al., 1983, Phys. Rev. Lett., 50 1668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton, B.C., Hodge, W.L. Moos, H.W., and Schwob, J.L. Suckewer, S. Finkenthal, M. Cohen, S., 1983, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 73 877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton, B.C. Moos, H.W., and Finkenthal, M., 1984a Astrophys. J. Lett., 279, L31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stratton, B.C., Moos, H.W., Feldman, U. Seely, J.F., Suckewer, S., Finkenthal, M. 1984b, to be published.Google Scholar