Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-30T03:36:30.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiative Corrections to Intensities of Dielectronic Satellite Lines Emitted from Helium- and Lithium-Like Argon*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

V.L. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Plasma Physics Division, Plasma Radiation Branch, Washington, D. C. 20375
J.E. Rogerson
Affiliation:
Naval Research Laboratory, Plasma Physics Division, Plasma Radiation Branch, Washington, D. C. 20375

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The process of dielectronic recombination has been the subject of intense theoretical activity mainly because of the pioneering work by Burgess (1964), who demonstrated that this process can be the dominant recombination mechanism for multiply-charged atomic ions in low-density high-temperature astrophysical and laboratory plasmas. Recent attempts to measure dielectronic recombination cross sections and rate coefficients have renewed interest in the development of a rigorous quantum-mechanical theory of the resonant electron-ion recombination process. A precise theory is clearly required for the interpretation of the dielectronic satellite lines, which have been found to be of great value in the spectroscopic determination of temperatures, densities, and departures from ionization equilibrium.

Type
Session 4. Theoretical Spectroscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Naval Research Laboratory 1984. Publication courtesy of the Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC.

Footnotes

*

Work Supported by the Office of Naval Research

References

1. Armstrong, L. Jr., Theodosiou, C.E., and Wall, M.J. 1978, Phys. Rev. A 18, 2538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Burgess, A. 1964, Astrophys. J. 139, 776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Cowan, R.D. 1967, Phys. Rev. 163, 54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Davies, P.C.W., and Seaton, M.J. 1969, J. Phys. B 2, 757.Google Scholar
5. Haan, S.L., and Cooper, J. 1983, Phys. Rev. A 28, 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Shore, B.W. 1967, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar