Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:24:32.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiation Hydrodynamics: Conference Themes and Unsolved Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

J. Michael Shull
J. Michael Shull*
Affiliation:
Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics, University of Colorado and National Bureau of Standards, Boulder, Colorado 80309 (, USA)

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper will be a short review of the topics covered at this conference on “Radiation Hydrodynamics in Stars and Compact Objects.” Rather than attempt to cover all the talks and posters, I will describe what I saw as the main themes and then summarize selected topics that provided unsolved questions. Finally, I will try to decide whether we strayed too far from the original purpose of the meeting. Or, put as a question: Does Radiation Hydrodynamics play a major role in solving a wide range of astrophysical problems?

As described in Mihalas’ introductory talk, radiation can affect an astrophysical plasma, flow, or object in several fashions. First, it can influence the kinematics through ionization, dissociation, and other gas-phase processes that depend on chemistry, ionization state, or excitation. But second, it can influence the dynamics of the flow, through deposition of momentum. Examples of the latter are shock waves, accretion disks, novae, supernovae, and hot-star winds. One can, therefore, divide the topics at this meeting into “active” and “passive” classes of radiation hydrodynamic problems (Table 1). The term “active” implies dynamic pressure from the radiation, whereas the term “passive” allows the radiation to affect the state of the gas, particularly its spectral emissivity, without affecting its motion appreciably.

Type
9. Summary
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 89: Radiation Hydrodynamics in Stars and Compacts Objects , 1986 , pp. 440 - 450
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1986

References

1. Lepp, S., McCray, R., Shull, J.M., Woods, D.T., and Kallman, T. 1985, Ap. J., 288, 58.Google Scholar
2. Krolik, J.H., McKee, C.F., and Tarter, C.B. 1981, Ap. J., 249, 422.Google Scholar
3. Field, G.B., Goldsmith, D.W., and Habing, H.J. 1969, Ap. J. (Letters), 155, L49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Shull, J.M., and Woods, D.T. 1985, Ap. J., 288, 50.Google Scholar
5. McCray, R. 1979, in Active Galactic Nuclei, eds. Hazard., C.R. and Mitton, S. (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), p. 227.Google Scholar
6. Papaloizou, J., Faulkner, J., and Lin, D.N.C. 1983, M.N.R.A.S., 205, 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Meyer, F., and Meyer-Hofmeister, E. 1981, Astr. Ap., 104, L10.Google Scholar
8. Begelman, M.C., McKee, C. F., and Shields, G.A. 1983, Ap. J., 271, 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Begelman, M. C., and McKee, C.F. 1983, Ap. J., 271, 89.Google Scholar
10. Elmegreen, B.G., and Lada, C.J. 1977, Ap. J., 214, 725.Google Scholar
11. Palla, F., Salpeter, E.E., and Stahler, S.W. 1983, Ap. J., 271, 632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Lepp, S., and Shull, J.M. 1984, Ap. J., 280, 465.Google Scholar
13. Lucy, L.B., and White, R.L. 1980, Ap. J., 241, 300.Google Scholar
14. Owocki, S.P., and Rybicki, G.B. 1984, Ap. J., 284, 337.Google Scholar
15. Castor, J.I., Abbott, D. C., and Klein, R.I. 1975, Ap. J., 195, 157.Google Scholar
16. Axelrod, T. 1981, Ph.D. Thesis, University of California.Google Scholar
17. Ebisuzaki, T., Hanawa, T., and Sugimoto, D. 1984, Publ. Astr. Soc. Japan, 36, 551.Google Scholar
18. Shull, J.M. 1983, Ap. J., 264, 446.Google Scholar
19. Mathews, W.E. 1983, Ap. J., 272, 390.Google Scholar
20. Voit, G.M., and Shull, J.M. 1985, Ap. J., in press.Google Scholar