Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:20:50.221Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quiescent And Flaring Radio Emission From dMe Stars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

D. M. Gibson
D. M. Gibson*
Affiliation:
Dept. of Physics, New Mexico Tech, Socorro, NM USA

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In reviewing radio studies of M-dwarf flare stars one is struck by the curious way in which the field developed. Indeed, that is twenty years old may be the greatest surprise, for if one imagines the largest solar flares occurring at distances comparable to the nearest stars the expected flux densities would be < 10 mJy. Yet, despite the fact that detection thresholds in 1963 were about two orders of magnitude higher than the expected value, Lovell et al. (1963) made extensive observations and reported the. detection of UV Ceti. This remarkable discovery was followed immediately by detections of V371 Ori (Slee et al., 1963) and EV Lac (Lovell et al., 1964). One might have thought that these unexpected discoveries would have spurred significant interest in this new field but they did not.

Type
Session II: Observed Activity in Red-Dwarfs
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 71: Activity in Red-Dwarf Stars , 1983 , pp. 273 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1983

References

REFERENCES

Andrews, A.D. 1969, IBVS No. 325.Google Scholar
Davis, R.J., Lovell, B., Palmer, H.P., and Spencer, R.E. 1978, Nature, 273, 644.Google Scholar
Fisher, P.L. and Gibson, D.M. 1982, in Second Cambridge Workshop on Cool Stars, Stellar Systems, and the Sun (eds. Giampapa, M.S. and Golub, L.), Vol. 2, 109 (SAO:Cambridge).Google Scholar
Gary, D.E., Dulk, G.A., and Linsky, J.L. 1982, submitted to Ap.J.Google Scholar
Gary, D.E. and Linsky, J.L. 1981, Ap. J., 250, 284.Google Scholar
Haisch, B.H., et al. 1981, Ap. J., 245, 1009.Google Scholar
Kahler, S., et al. 1982, Ap. J., 252, 239.Google Scholar
Karpen, J.T. et al. 1977, Ap. J., 216, 479.Google Scholar
Kunkel, W.E. 1969, IBVS No. 325.Google Scholar
Lovell, B. 1969, Nature, 222, 1126.Google Scholar
Lovell, B. 1971, Quart. J.R.A.S., 12, 98.Google Scholar
Lovell, B., Whipple, F.L., and Solomon, L.H. 1963, Nature, 198, 228.Google Scholar
Lovell, B., Whipple, F.L., and Solomon, L.H. 1964, Nature, 202, 377.Google Scholar
Melrose, D.B. and Dulk, G.A. 1982, Ap.J., in press.Google Scholar
Nelson, G.J. Robinson, R.D., Slee, O.B., Fielding, G., Page, A.A., and Walker, W.S.G. 1979, MNRAS, 187, 405.Google Scholar
Slee, O.B., Allen, W.H., Coates, B.W., Page, A.A., and Quinn, P.J. 1982, preprint.Google Scholar
Slee, O.B., Higgins, CS., Roslund, C., and Lynga, G. 1969, Nature, 224, 1087.Google Scholar
Slee, O.B., Solomon, L.H., and Patson, G.E. 1963, Nature, 199, 991.Google Scholar
Slee, O.B., Touky, I.R. Nelson, G.J., and Renie, C.J. 1981, Nature, 292, 220.Google Scholar
Spangler, S.R. and Moffett, T.J. 1976, Ap. J., 203, 497.Google Scholar
Spangler, S.R., Rankin, J.M., and Shawhan, S.D. 1974a, Ap. J. (Lett.), 194, L43.Google Scholar
Spangler, S.R., Shawhan, S.D., and Rankin, J.M. 1974b, Ap. J. (Lett.), 190, L129.Google Scholar
Topka, K. and Marsh, K.A. 1982, Ap. J., 254, 641.Google Scholar