Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T22:13:48.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photoelectric Polarimetry of the Tail of Comet Ikey-Seki (1965 VIII)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2018

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

With few exceptions, measurements of cometary brightness and polarization have been restricted to regions in or near the coma and therefore to a relatively small range of phase angles. Photoelectric techniques are required for detailed wavelength coverage, whereas large-field photographic techniques are better suited for mapping the large regions of sky spanned by a comet tail. Observations with a small field of view provide high spatial resolution but generally restrict multicolor measurements of brightness and polarization to a small region of the comet. Observations with a large field of view (diameter larger than 1 or 2 deg) provide adequate color and spatial coverage but can result in the loss of detail. A compromise is afforded by Fabry photometry, using a modest telescope of small aperture and relatively large field of view.

Type
Part I
Copyright
Copyright © NASA 1976

References

Bemporad, A. 1907, Versuch einer neuen empirischen Formel zur Darstellung der Anderung der Intensität der Sonnenstrahlung mit der Zenitdistanz, Meteorol. Zeits., 24, 306313.Google Scholar
Blacker, H. V. and Gadsden, M. 1967, The calibration of airglow photometers, ESSA Technical Memorandum, IERTM-ITSA 85, AugustGoogle Scholar
Clarke, D. 1971, Polarization measurements of the head of CometGoogle Scholar
Bennett, (1969i), Astron. and Astrophys., 14, 9094.Google Scholar
Clarke, D. 1974, Nomenclature of polarized light: linear polarization, Applied Optics, 13, 35 Google Scholar
Cunningham, L. E. 1965, IAU Circ., No. 1933.Google Scholar
Dave, J. V. 1968, Subroutines for computing the parameters of the electromagnetic radiation scattered by a sphere, Rep. No. 320-3237, IBM Scientific Center, Palo Alto, Calif. Google Scholar
Donn, B., Powell, R. S., and Remy-Battiau, L. 1967, Interpretation of the continuous spectra of comets, Nature, 213, 379.Google Scholar
Fabry, C. 1910, The intrinsic brightness of the starlit sky, Astrophys. J., 31, 394403.Google Scholar
Fabry, C. 1943, Une methode de photométrie photographique applicable aux objets ayant un diamètre apparent sensible, Ann. d'Astrophys, 6, 6576.Google Scholar
Gadsden, M. 1967* private communication.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. M. 1970, Models of the zodiacal light, in Space Research X, (Amsterdam: North Holland Publ. Co.), 225232.Google Scholar
Harvit, M. and Vanýsek, V. 1971, Alignment of dust particles in comet tails, Bull. Astr. Inst. Czech., 22, 1821.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. S. 1954, The solar constant, J. Meteorol., 11, 431439.Google Scholar
Matyagin, V. S., Sabitov, Sh. N., and Kharitonov, A. V. 1968, Polarimetry of the tail of Comet Ikeya-Seki, Soviet Astron.-AJ, 11, 863867.Google Scholar
Roach, F. E. and Pettit, H. B. 1951, On the diurnal variation of [OI] 5577 in the nightglow, J. Geophys. Res., 56, 325353.Google Scholar
Roemer, E. 1966, private communication.Google Scholar
Schoenberg, E. 1929, Theoretische Photometrie, in Handbuch der Astrophysik, II/1, 1280 Google Scholar
Sekanina, Z. 1975, private communication.Google Scholar
St.Amand, P. 1955, Instrumentation for nightglow research, Ann. de Geophys., 11, 435449 Google Scholar
Swings, P. 1963, Scattering by cometary particles, in ICES, Electromagnetic Scattering, (Kerker, M., ed.), 159169, (New York: Macmillan Co.).Google Scholar
Vanýsek, V. 1970, The behaviour of the polarization of polydisperse interplanetary cloud, Publ. Astr. Inst. Charles University, Prague, No. 58, 310.Google Scholar
Weinberg, J. L. 1964a, The zodiacal light at 53OOA, Ann. d'Astrophys., 27, 718738.Google Scholar
Weinberg, J. L. 1964b, On the use of a pile-of-plates polarizer - the transmitted component, Applied Optics, 3, 1057106l.Google Scholar