Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T01:42:38.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Adoption of a Terrestrial Reference Frame

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Dennis D. McCarthy*
Affiliation:
U. S. Naval Observatory, Washington, D.C. 20390

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The report of the IAU Working Group on Nutation endorsed by Commissions 4, 8, 19 and 31 at the 1979 General Assembly points out that “… the complete theory of the general nutational motion of the Earth about its center of mass may be described by the sum of two components, astronomical nutation, commonly referred to as nutation, which is nutation with respect to a space-fixed coordinate system, and polar motion, which is nutation with respect to a body-fixed system …”. Unlike the situation for the space-fixed frame, there is not an adequate, formally accepted, body-fixed system for this purpose. The Conventional International Origin (CIO) as it is presently defined is no longer acceptable because of recent improvements in observational techniques. The effective lack of this type of terrestrial reference frame limits the complete description of the general nutational motion of the Earth. In the absence of a terrestrial reference frame suitable for specifying the orientation of the Earth, it is suggested that a body-fixed system could be represented formally in a manner analogous to that used to represent the space-fixed frame. This procedure would be quite similar to methods employed currently by the International Polar Motion Service and the Bureau International de l’Heure, and would allow for the use of observations from new techniques in the definition of a terrestrial reference frame to be used to specify the complete nutational motion of the Earth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Reidel 1981

References

Fedorov, E. P.: 1979, “On the Coordinate Systems Used in the Study of Polar Motion”, in Time and the Earth’s Rotation, McCarthy, D. and Pilkington, J. D. H., eds., D. Reidel Pub. Co., Dordrecht, pp. 89101.Google Scholar
Fricke, W.: 1975, “Definition of the Celestial Reference Coordinate System in Fundamental Catalogs”, in On. Reference Coordinate Systems for Earth Dynamics, Kolaczek, B. and Weiffenbach, G., eds., Warsaw Technical University, Warsaw, pp. 201222.Google Scholar
Grafarend, E. W., Mueller, I. I., Papo, H. G., Richter, B.: 1979Concepts for Reference Frames in Geodesy and Geodynamics: The Refence Directions”, Bull. Geodesique, 53, pp. 195213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAU Commission 4 Report: 1980, Transactions of IAU, 17B, in press.Google Scholar
Kinoshita, H., Nakajima, K., Kubo, Y., Nakagawa, I., Sasao, T., and Yokoyama, K.: 1979, “Note on Nutation in Ephemerides”, Pub. Int. Latitude Obs. Mizusawa, XII, pp. 71108.Google Scholar
Kovalevsky, J.: 1979, “The Reference Systems” in Time and the Earth’s Rotation, McCarthy, D. and Pilkington, J. D. H., eds., D. Reidel Pub. Co., Dordrecht, pp. 151163.Google Scholar
McCarthy, D. D., Klepczynski, W. J., Kaplan, G. H., Josties, F. J., Branham, R. L., Westerhout, G., Johnston, K. J., and Spencer, J. H., “Variation of Earth Orientation Parameters from Changes in the Orientation of the 35-km Baseline of the Green Bank Interferometer”, in BIH Annual Report for 1979.Google Scholar
Woolard, E. W.: 1953, Astron. Papers Prepared for the Use of the American Ephemeris and Nautical Almanac, XV, part 1.Google Scholar