Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:42:19.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Non-steady Global Magnetic Fields in Kinematic Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

J.H.G.M. van Geffen
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht Astronomical Institute, P.O. Box 80000, 3508 TA Utrecht
P. Hoyng
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht
C. Zwaan
Affiliation:
Astronomical Institute, P.O. Box 80000, 3508 TA Utrecht

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The dynamo equation for the mean field ⟨B⟩ contains a random forcing term of unknown magnitude, which is therefore always omitted. The influence of this term is potentially large. To evaluate its effect, we employ ensemble averaging. If an ensemble average is used, there is no random forcing term in the dynamo equation. The effect of fluctuations is that the ensemble members get out of phase, so that ⟨B⟩→0. The damping time of ⟨B⟩ can be found by requiring that the mean energy ⟨BB⟩ remains finite. The eigenvalues к of the dynamo equation then all have negative real parts.Imк determines the period, and −Reк/Imк the relative period stability of the dynamo. We have developed a code to solve the equation for ⟨BB⟩ in a spherical shell (the convection zone), assuming axisymmetry. We report our first results, which do not yet include differential rotation. Using spherically symmetric boundary conditions, we reproduce the well known α2-dynamo, whose behaviour is known analytically. For instance, for an α2-dynamo located in a shell with inner boundary at R/2, we find that ⟨BB⟩ remains finite for R2γ/β=1.48, where β represents turbulent diffusion and γ turbulent vorticity. Taking α = ¼(βγ)½ — a factor of four below maximum helicity — implies that we have a dynamo number CαRα/β = 0.30. Using this value we find a damping time of 6 × 10−2R2/β for ⟨B⟩, which is a measure for the coherence time of B in a single ensemble member. This result implies that the large-scale field of this particular α2-dynamo reorganizes its structure completely on a time scale of only about one year (for solar values of R and β), and it shows the enormous influence of random forcing in general.

Type
Part II Current stellar dynamo theory
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1991

References

Hoyng, P.: 1987, Astron. Astrophys. 171, 357 Google Scholar
Knobloch, E.: 1978, Astron. J. 220, 330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, F., Rädler, K.-H.: 1980, Mean Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory, Pergamon Press, London Google Scholar
Moffatt, H.K.: 1978, Magnetic Field Generation in Electrically Conducting Fluids, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
Van Geffen, J.H.G.M., Hoyng, P.: 1990, Geophys. Astrophys. Fluid Dynam. 53, 109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar