Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:42:11.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Method of Statistical Analysis of Cometary Light-Curves Applied to P/Halley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Serge Thebault
Serge Thebault*
Affiliation:
122 rue de Général-Galliéni, F-92100 Boulogne, France

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Various methods of determining the rotation of P/Halley’s nucleus give 2 periods: 53 hours, and 7.4 days (1). Cometary light-curves are commonly a function of heliocentric magnitude versus the logarithm of heliocentric distance: the result is a set of scattered points. The average light-curve is calculated by the least-squares method. The method proposed here is a reduction of scatter by computation to derive the comet’s specific light variations. The factors causing scatter are: observer experience (physiological and psychological effects), instrumental factors, comet morphology, methods of comparison, and observing conditions. Recently Morris and Edberg (2) have shown that the first three of these were the most important factors. In fact, the prime necessity is to consider visual magnitude estimates as a statistical sample with variability caused by scattering factors. This effect is different for each sample of estimates. Mathematical correction will be applied only after a statistical analysis of the effect of the factors causing error. The method consists of four steps:

  1. 1) Computation of heliocentric magnitude (mH) and study of the number of observations for each observer. Observers with less than 10 are omitted (because the least-squares method is not reliable in such a case).

  2. 2) Correction of instrumental factors and observer effect. Computation by least-squares method is carried out between (mH) versus instrument diameter (D) and exit pupil (P). The diameter and exit-pupil correction is made only if the correlation is significant and not systematic. The correction for observer effect is achieved (for each observer) by least-square computation between mH and logarithm of heliocentric distance. The O–C magnitude is plotted on a graph and a preliminary curve drawn.

  3. 3) Correction of bias: when a magnitude estimate is made on one night, an estimate the next night will tend to be equal because of psychological effects. It is possible to detect this effect by comparing the number of equal and different magnitude estimates (±0.1 mag) made at time-intervals of 24 hours, and over 24 hours. This comparison is made with the χ2 test. If the test is significant the biased estimates are omitted.

  4. 4) Other factors (systematic error, photoelectric sequence of comparison stars) are detected by multi-factorial analysis and deleted.

Type
Part III Observations and Results
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 98: Stargazers: The Contribution of Amateurs to Astronomy , 1988 , pp. 153 - 154
Copyright
Copyright © Springer-Verlag 1988

References

1. Festem, M. et al.: “Periodicities in the light-curve of P/Halley and the rotation of its nucleus”, Astron, and Astrophys., in pressGoogle Scholar
2. Edberg, S.J. et al.: “Observational factors affecting studies of comet P/Halley’s visual light-curve”, Proc. 20th ESLAB Symposion on the Exploration of Halley’s Comet, Heidelberg, 1986 Oct. 27-31Google Scholar