Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T20:09:56.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nature of Atmospheric Turbulence Effects on Imaging and Pseudo-Imaging Systems, and its Quantification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2016

David L.
David L.*
Affiliation:
Fried the Optical Sciences Company, P. O. Box 446, Placentia, CA 92670, USA

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Over the last two decades, an extensive body of knowledge has been developed concerning the effects of atmospheric turbulence on optical propagation. Much of this is directly relevant to astronomical imaging, and with proper interpretation, to the type of pseudo-imagery that is of concern to us at this conference. This paper will provide an overview of this matter, hopefully with sufficient insight developed that the reader will be able to quickly estimate the nature and magnitude of the turbulence effects to be expected in a pseudo-imagery process. The paper starts with a review of turbulence effects on conventional imagery, reviewing the “nondimensional” nature of the turbulence statistics, presenting the local measure of the optical strength of turbulence, , and developing the resolution scale, r0. It presents a statistical view of the nature of the wavefront distortion geometry, indicating the dominance of the random wavefront tilt component. The MTF for conventional imagery and for speckle interferometry (Labeyrie) is presented with comments concerning their relationship. Following that, the foundation of the speckle imagery concept (Knox-Thompson) is presented. Results are then set forth for the allowable spectral bandwidth in speckle techniques, as well as results defining the allowable field-of-view size (isoplanatism) and the allowable exposure time for speckle techniques. Taken all together, these results provide a basis for estimating most of the significant effects of atmospheric turbulence in speckle interferometry and speckle imagery.

Type
The Scientific Programme
Information
International Astronomical Union Colloquium , Volume 50: High Angular Resolution Stellar Interferometry , January 1979 , pp. 4-1 - 4-44
Copyright
Copyright © 1979

References

1. Kolmogorov, A., Compt. Rend. (Doklady) de l'Academiedes sciences de l'U.S.S.R. v, 538 (1941); translated in Turbulence — Classic Papers on Statistical Theory, Friedlander, S. K. and Topper, L., Eds. (Interscience Publishers, Inc., New York, 1961)Google Scholar
2. Tatarski, V. I., Wave Propagation in a Turbulent Medium (McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New York, 1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Pond, S., Smith, S. D., Hamblin, P. F., and Burling, R. W., “Spectrum of Velocity and Temperature Fluctuations in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer Over the Sea”, J. Atmos. Sci 23 , 376 (1966)Google Scholar
4. Ting-i Wang, , Ochs, G. R., and Clifford, S. F., “A Saturation-Resistant Optical Scintillometer to Measure , J. Opt. Soc. Am., 68, 334 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Greenwood, D., private communicationGoogle Scholar
6. Mevers, G. E., Keister, M. P. Jr., and Fried, D. L., Optical Propagation Measurements at Emerson Lake — 1968 , NASA Contractor Report, NASA CR-1733 , Sept 1971 Google Scholar
7. Kurtz, R. L. and Hayes, J. L., Experimental Measurements of Optical Angular Deviation Caused by Atmospheric Turbulence and Refraction , NASA Technical Note, NASA TN D-3439, May 1966 Google Scholar
8. Fried, D. L., “Propagation of a Spherical Wave in a Turbulent Medium”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57 , 175 (1967)Google Scholar
9. Lutomirski, R. F., Huschke, R. E., Meecham, W. C., and Yura, H.T., Degradation of Laser Systems by Atmospheric Turbulence , Rand Co. Rpt. , R-1171-ARPA/RC,June 1976Google Scholar
10. Fried, D. L., “Optical Heterodyne Detection of an Atmospherically Distorted Signal Wave Front”, Proc. IEEE 55 ,57 (1967) — cf also Ref. 15Google Scholar
11. Fried, D. L. and Mevers, G. E., “Evaluation of r0 for Propagation Down Through the Atmosphere”, Appl. Opt. 13 , 2620 (1974) ; 14, 2567 (1975) ; 16 , 549 (1977)Google Scholar
12. Fried, D. L., “Statistics of a Geometric Representation of Wavefront Distortion”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55 , 1427 (1965).Google Scholar
13. Noll, R. J., “Zernike Polynomials and Atmospheric Turbulence”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 66 , 207 (1976).Google Scholar
14. Hufnagel, R. E. and Stanley, N. R., “Modulation Transfer Function Associated with Image Transmission Through Turbulent Media”, J. Opt Soc. Am. 54 , 52 (1964).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Fried, D. L., “Optical Resolution Through a Randomly Inhomogeneous Medium for Very Long and Very Short Exposures”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56 , 1372 (1966).Google Scholar
16. Labeyrie, A., “High-Resolution Techniques in Optical Astronomy”,in Progress in Optics Vol. XIV, Wolf, E. Ed. ,(North Holland Publishing Co. , Amsterdam, 1976).Google Scholar
17. Knox, K.T. and Thompson, B.J., “Recovery of Images from Atmospherically Degraded Short-Exposure Photographs”, Ap.J. 193 , L45 (1974).Google Scholar
18. Korff, D., “Analysis of a Method for Obtaining Near-Diffraction-Limited Information in the Presence of Atmospheric Turbulence”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 63 , 971 (1973).Google Scholar
19. Fried, D.L., “Angle-of-Arrival Isoplanatism”, Part II of Theortical Study of Non-Standard Imaging Concepts , Rome Air Development Center Rpt No. RADC-TR-76-51, March 1976.Google Scholar
20. Fried, D.L., “Isoplanatic Aspects of Predetection Compensation Imagery”,Chap I of Theoretical Study of Non-Standard Imaging Concepts, Rome Air Development Center Rpt. No.RADC-TR-74-185.Google Scholar
21. Greenwood, D. P., “Bandwidth Specification for Adaptive Optics Systems”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 67 , 390 (1977).Google Scholar
22. Gringorten, I. I., Lenhand, R. W. Jr., Salmela, H. A., and Sissinwine, N.,“Winds” Fig. 4 - 23, in Handbook of Geophysics and Space Environments , Valley, S. L., Ed.(McGraw-Hill Book Co. ,Inc. , New York, 1965).Google Scholar