Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T14:27:49.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring Mass Loss Rates from Galactic Satellites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2016

Kathryn V. Johnston
Affiliation:
Institute for Advanced Study, Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA
Stein Sigurdsson
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 0HA
Lars Hernquist
Affiliation:
Board of Studies in Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Number count profiles of many Galactic and some extra-galactic satellite systems show evidence for associated stars beyond the cut-off in density that is identified as the point of tidal limitation (e.g. Irwin & Hatzidimitriou 1995, Grillmair et al. 1995). These “extra-tidal” stars are assumed to be debris lost from the satellite due to heating or stripping by the Galactic tidal field or (in the case of globular clusters) evaporation of stars over the tidal boundary. In this contribution we present a method for using these features to measure the mass loss rate from the satellite, and test it on the results of numerical simulations of satellite disruption. A more detailed discussion of all aspects of this work can be found in Johnston, Sigurdsson & Hemquist (1998).

In the numerical simulations, the satellite’s evolution along an orbit in a three component rigid model of the Galaxy is followed using a self-consistent field (SCF) code (developed by Hernquist & Ostriker 1992) to calculate the mutual interactions of stars in the satellite. Figure 1 shows the annularly averaged number surface density from one example simulation “observed” from the viewpoint of the center of the Galaxy after several Gigayears. The closed (open) symbols show the profile recovered if only bound (all) stars are considered. Clearly there is a break in the open symbols at the radius rbreak where the analysis becomes dominated by unbound stars.

Type
Extended Abstracts
Copyright
Copyright © Kluwer 1999

References

Grillmair, C.J., Freeman, K.C., Irwin, M. and Quinn, P.J.: 1995, Astron. J. 109, 2553 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernquist, L. & Ostriker, J.P.: 1992, Astrophys.J. 386, 375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, M.J. andHatzidimitriou, D.: 1995, MNRAS 277, 1354 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, K.V., Sigurdsson, S. and Hernquist, L.: 1998, MNRAS, in pressGoogle Scholar